Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
A man-made doctrine of faith/worship is any doctrine or point that's not derived from Scripture. And that includes those made by mens' twisting of Scripture to try to make it fit their invention. As "In The Light" posted in the now-closed thread, this includes almost every "ism" in faith/worship.
Personally, I don't believe ANY such doctrine, and won't hesitate to call it false and rag on it.
I believe we have a D-U-T-Y to combat false doctrines of faith/worship whenever/wherever we find them. Problems arise when two people disagree on what's false & what's true. That's why I allow SCRIPTURE, believed as literally as possible, decide for me.
Hello Archangel,If it is "you" "allowing" scripture [to] do anything, it is you who are minting the doctrines, not scripture.
The Archangel
It's not that simple.
If it is "you" "allowing" scripture [to] do anything, it is you who are minting the doctrines, not scripture.
The Archangel
Where is your Biblical reference for opposing all things ending in -ism?
Most false doctrines are found in scripture, poor interpretation of scripture.Well, actually, it IS. If a doctrine isn't found in Scripture, it's not true, simple as that!
The problem with rejecting "isms" is the risk of painting oneself into a corner. About ism: "used as a productive suffix in the formation of nouns denoting action or practice, state or condition, principles, doctrines, a usage or characteristic, devotion or adherence, etc." [Dictionary.com]. So, if someone says they do not believe in isms, they are forced to back peddle when faced with...Trinitarianism or Baptism.
I'm sure if someone wants to, he/she can make the name of a true doctrine end in "ism"
Where is your Biblical reference for opposing all things ending in -ism?
Isn't "Baptist" similar tho "Calvinist"? = if "ism" was grammatically correct in all usage, we could apply it to the word Baptist as well.Spot on RobyCop!
Baptism and the Trinity are not "isms"!
And words like prism, etc. controvert these posts' faulty argumentation: that you've "painted yourself into a corner" by "opposing all things ending in -ism"
Most false doctrines are found in scripture, poor interpretation of scripture.
Isn't "Baptist" similar tho "Calvinist"?
Just sayin, your "ism" rap doesn't hold water.We all know who Calvin is, but who is Bapt? Never heard of him.
I'm the complete opposite doctrinally from where I began with Christ. "I was a teenage Arminian Dispensationalist". Think "I was a teenage Werewolf", the 50's horror flick but worse. And then add Pentecostalism to this.
Today after 40+ years of study I'm the complete opposite. But I still have the same presence of Christ in my heart. Instead of Dispensationalism, I'm Amillennial. Instead of Arminian, I'm Calvinistic holding to the first three of the five points. Instead of Pentecostal I'm a cessationist.
I came to the place where I needed to prove what I'd been taught was either true or false. And this is how it all turned out.
I used to believe as you do until I studied the bible for myself and proved myself wrong.The extreme views of either of them are wrong, but arminianism isn't entirely false. We have free will to come to Jesus or not.
As for dispensationalism - there are three dispensations - that of the Old Testament/Covenant, which was given only to Israel, while God counted believing Him, as Noah & Abraham did, for righteousness, especially among gentiles - the dispensation of the New Testament/Covenant, which we are now under, and that of the world to come where God will be physically and visibly present among us.
Most branches of pentecostalism are eaten up with man-made doctrines & are cultic, but there are some true Christians among them. (Note that most of the quack mega-teleministers are pentecostal!) so you did well to get away from them. Unfortunately you hopped from the frying pan into the fire with your "amillenial" stuff, which is actually preterism with a different name.
Much of calvinism is false, so watch yer step if you "tiptoe thru the TULIP".
The millenium is very plainly mentioned in Scripture as a "thousand years". It means EXACTLY THAT. To be "amillenial" is to deny Scripture.
Rev. 20:2And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years, 3And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.5And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.6Blessed and holy is the one who has a part in the first resurrection; over these the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with Him for a thousand years.7And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,
These Scriptures are very plain, and mean exactly what they say. The millenium is REAL, and will occur, as Scripture cannot be broken. And no one can make anything else outta those verses except what they plainly say!
The millenium is very plainly mentioned in Scripture as a "thousand years". It means EXACTLY THAT. To be "amillenial" is to deny Scripture.
These Scriptures are very plain, and mean exactly what they say. The millenium is REAL, and will occur, as Scripture cannot be broken. And no one can make anything else outta those verses except what they plainly say!
The gap before the 70th week is stupid.Maybe not stupid, but no evidence for it either.
The gap before the 70th week is stupid.