That applies to a lot these days.
This, IMHO, is the "UNDERSTATEMENT" of the week!!!
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That applies to a lot these days.
MRoss has been permanently banned - thus will not be able to answer your question
To have a negligent homicide, your negligent action has to cause the homicide. If M.E. says asphyxiation is NOT cause of death and overdose is most probable cause of death, what is the negligent action that caused death by overdose? I was never trained how to treat an O.D. I bet they were not either. Many people holler, scream, act a fool, and holler about not being able to breathe after a fight. I believe I would have just left him in car and drove off to either jail or E.R. They were at least trying to some degree to accommodate his problem.There is still an issue of not providing medical aid. When someone is restrained the restrainer takes responsibility for that person. A fair argument would be that the officers did not render aid or provide Mr. Floyd with the care he needed (as you note, he was screaming that he could not breathe before he was pulled out of the vehicle). That would mean that a murder charge is probably overreaching. But a negligent homicide may be more accurate.
When I worked as a psych tech we had overzealous techs who became abusive. The issue is (or so it was back then) that when we restrained someone (usually they were high on something, we were in DC) we took responsibility for them. Even if they died of drugs it was on us if we denied them treatment that could have prevented their deaths.To have a negligent homicide, your negligent action has to cause the homicide. If M.E. says asphyxiation is NOT cause of death and overdose is most probable cause of death, what is the negligent action that caused death by overdose? I was never trained how to treat an O.D. I bet they were not either. Many people holler, scream, act a fool, and holler about not being able to breathe after a fight. I believe I would have just left him in car and drove off to either jail or E.R. They were at least trying to some degree to accommodate his problem.
When I worked as a psych tech we had overzealous techs who became abusive. The issue is (or so it was back then) that when we restrained someone (usually they were high on something, we were in DC) we took responsibility for them. Even if they died of drugs it was on us if we denied them treatment that could have prevented their deaths.
I grant times could have changed (this was the mid 90's). But we had to be very careful, follow procedures, and be able to defend our actions as we could kill someone by their own stupidity.
That was inside an institution. More control. More knowledge of patient.When I worked as a psych tech we had overzealous techs who became abusive. The issue is (or so it was back then) that when we restrained someone (usually they were high on something, we were in DC) we took responsibility for them. Even if they died of drugs it was on us if we denied them treatment that could have prevented their deaths.
I grant times could have changed (this was the mid 90's). But we had to be very careful, follow procedures, and be able to defend our actions as we could kill someone by their own stupidity.
But was it criminal? No. He was using a restraint technique in which he was trained. If done properly, it does not harm.There us no justification to lean on a guys neck with your knee while he is handcuffed and four other cops walking around. That is a misuse of use of force.
That was half a block down Georgia Avenue. We knew nothing of the patient (this would be prior to admission).That was inside an institution. More control. More knowledge of patient.
If we hog tied, we were liable. Hand cuffing was just considered routine and SOP. I will bet his dept SOP mandates cuffing behind back. Despite bad optics, the knee over the neck was doing no harm.
I am not following what yall were doing.That was half a block down Georgia Avenue. We knew nothing of the patient (this would be prior to admission).
I was in better shape back then.
The cops would get some guy, put him in an ambulance. I worked on a psych ward. We'd get a call the ambulance was coming to the ER with a combative high dude. We'd go to the ER, but sometimes the guys would not make it in the ER doors and we would have to run after him and restrain him.I am not following what yall were doing.
There is no legal or logical reason for LEO to use a restraint technique on a handcuffed suspect that is unconscious, unresponsive, and without a detectable pulse. That is what they did for 2:45 sec.But was it criminal? No. He was using a restraint technique in which he was trained. If done properly, it does not harm.....
They did more than that. They stayed on top of Mr. Floyd for 2:45 sec knowing he was unconscious, unresponsive, and had no detectable pulse.They called EMS and waited for EMS to arrive. That is their legal burden.
He was only unconscious for a short time.There is no legal or logical reason for LEO to use a restraint technique on a handcuffed suspect that is unconscious, unresponsive, and without a detectable pulse. That is what they did for 2:45 sec.
I suspect their training included some kind of warning that if the suspect is unconscious, unresponsive and has no detectable pulse.... get off of him immediately.
peace to you
You keep changing your mind.They did more than that. They stayed on top of Mr. Floyd for 2:45 sec knowing he was unconscious, unresponsive, and had no detectable pulse.
MURDER
peace to you
I haven’t changed my mind. I accurately stated what the ME report stated and pointed out it was not definitive.You keep changing your mind.
Cause of death is drug overdose.
Cause of death, not asphyxiation.
How exactly is that murder?
What medical evidence do you have that he was only unconscious for a short time? What does a “short time” mean?He was only unconscious for a short time.
Dont you think "definitive" is necessary to establish guilt BEYOND a reasonable doubt?I haven’t changed my mind. I accurately stated what the ME report stated and pointed out it was not definitive.
I agreed with you the ME report would be a problem for the prosecution.
I stated it was likely a plea deal would be worked out for a lesser charge.
But I haven’t changed my mind. The 2:45 on the neck after Mr. Floyd was unconscious, unresponsive, and without a detectable pulse makes it murder, imo
peace to you