I find no evidence of Calvin making such a claim.
As to Gill, he did make the claim in his comment on Jude 9.
Spurgeon? Some issues he seemed to be straddling the fence. This was one of them. In one sermon he implies that they are the same, in another, not.
Edwards, I haven't researched yet.
But these men were commentators. They are not inspired authority. The fact that Hebrews 1 shows us that none of the angels have the position that Jesus has, and that all angels will worship Him, reveals that He cannot be Michael.
The term "archangel" simply means "chief angel." Michael was chief angel, but an angel nonetheless. And the Bible states that all the angels will worship Christ. Michael will be one of those angels worshiping Christ.
Spurgeon's comments directly from his sermons.............
“By faith we rise into the conquering place this day. In the heavenlies we triumph, as also in every place. We rejoice in our Lord Jesus Christ, the Michael of the angels, the Redeemer of men. For by Him we see Satan cast out and all the powers of evil hurled from their places of power and eminence.”
From “Our Lord’s Transcendent Greatness” (Dec. 2, 1866):
You remember how our Lord, who is the true Michael, the only great Archangel, said at the beginning of the preaching of the Gospel, “I beheld Satan as lightning falling from Heaven.”
From “The Angelic Life” (Nov. 22, 1868):
“We read that Michael and his angels fought against the dragon and his angels, and the dragon was cast down. The fight is going on every day. Michael is the Lord Jesus, the only Archangel.”