Yep.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Moore's accusers are lying!
- Thread starter AwesomeMachine
- Start date
- Status
Wow. Just wow.
But the issue is this: What is considered "immodest" is really the society in which we live. At one time seeing a woman's ankles was immodest but that is no longer the case in all but the most strict of societies. Even a very chaste elderly woman would feel comfortable showing her ankles.
So yes, we consider some things "immodest" but do you think doctors don't become inured to immodesty? They've seen it all and know what might be under that 2" of fabric and it doesn't do much for most of them. Why is that? Because they've seen it before and it just isn't a big deal. Not that we are looking to flaunt everything - and I personally think MANY of these women need a mirror in their home because they just do.not.look.good in some of these outfits. I don't know what their mamas taught them but honey, find something that actually fits you. You do NOT look attractive.
But yes, I believe that it is easy to just not be pulled towards something you see all the time.
Somebody should invent a mirror that, when you stand in front of it, instead of a frontal view, you see yourself from behind. A lot of women would burn their skin tight stretch pants!
Don't feel lonely. As a contract employee I was "propositioned" by a woman manager of a manufacturing company for which I was hired on as a software engineer.
I refused and was let go because of "budgetary reasons". I was not alone and she was not the only female manager guilty of these sins.
HankD
Somebody should invent a mirror that, when you stand in front of it, instead of a frontal view, you see yourself from behind. A lot of women would burn their skin tight stretch pants!
People Of Walmart - Funny Pictures of People Shopping at Walmart
Wear shorts that show bottom of butt cheeks, tube top that shows breasts perfectly, bras that show nipples, lose virginity in high school; you tell me what they are.
AwesomeMachine
Member
In response to the woman who got hit on in her barn clothes, either you were really, really hot, the men weren't too fussy, or your embellishing the truth, which, again, gives women a bad name. But to a woman the end always justifies the means. Women have to expect if they're not wearing a wedding band, don't have children with them, are wearing flashy jewelry, cosmetics, bare legs and arms, low neckline, and hair dangling like a maiden's, men will approach them and some will grab them.
If a woman receives tactile attention, it's best to take it as a compliment, because it means the guy thinks she is attractive. Some men are boors. People just have to live with it. It's impolite, but not illegal; as if someone asked for the time and there other person said, "Buy a watch, you loser!"
But harassment is determined by whether or not the woman finds the harasser attractive. It must get the guy what he wants most of the time, or he wouldn't do it. You don't keep fishing where you don't catch fish! Harassment is the same way. What ever happened to common sense?
Also, heels thrust the woman's body into a courtship posture, with breasts heaved and buttocks tipped. If a woman is going to wear shoes that do that, what does she expect? SHEESH!
But if a woman doesn't want boorish attention, there are ways to accomplish that. I was very attractive as a youth. I dated hundreds of girls. I was a body builder/fitness freak, partier, socialite. I was once accused of rape after I dumped a girl, because she was angry that I broke up with her. I didn't get into any trouble over it, but it happens a lot. I just told the cops that me and the girl kept dating for two weeks after the supposed rape. But still, women back then were nothing compared to what they are today!
My son is very attractive. He was living platonicly with a female roommate in college. He is a Baptist. One day he came home and his roommate was naked in the living room making out with another girl. They asked him to join in, and he told her to keep her private activities in her own bedroom, not the living room. These are girls in their late teens/early twenties!
And, women have been dressing extremely immodestly only for the last 50 years or so. That's nothing compared to the time mankind has existed. Men are genetically hard-wired to mate the female. They respond to the woman's body. The more skin they see, the more they respond. God made it that way. If a woman looks like trash, she'll be treated like trash.
On the other hand, no one is genetically hardwired to steal. Therefore, the analogy of blaming the woman to blaming the person who make items attractive to thieves is not valid. Not only that, but the flaw in such a comparison should be intuitively obvious to even the most casual observer! Therefore, it's intentionally contrived for no constructive purpose!
But you say, in cultures where women go topless, men aren't aroused by it. But the men do get turned on by topless white women visiting the same location! So, men don't get excited over having their babies nursed on dark breasts, but they do get excited about a white woman nursing their offspring.
I think that's because white women are the daughters of God. Everywhere on earth white females are the preferred mating stock. In Japan, which is about as far away as you can get, white women can make a million dollars a year as escorts. Japanese escort girls make only about 60,000.00/year.
So, it's really the white women who need to be modest in dress and bodily demeanor to avoid unwanted attention. But there's some really hot Arab chicks! I wouldn't mate with them, because I won't mate with any woman who hasn't been baptized. Now, if a guy hires a secretary because he's attracted to her physically, but she refuses to date him, he should be allowed to fire her, and hire another girl who will. But the guy should not be permitted to use threats to entice the girl to date him.
If it wasn't assumed that all young women fornicate, the only male attention they would receive would be aimed at the objective of marriage. If a guy knew a girl would never have intimate contact until marriage, he wouldn't approach her except with the intention of possible marriage. That is a noble intention, and any man who has that intention will treat a woman well.
Women suffer harassment because it is assumed they are willing to fornicate. If any girl is harassed, even the slightest bit, all she has to do is say, "I'm a Christian. I would never allow myself privacy with a man I'm not related to, much less any form of intimate contact!" Once one guy hears that, every other guy will find out, and the girl won't be harassed. But women love the attention!
We live in a world where women are just staying in the workforce throughout their season of fertility. Ideally, women should be married at about age 16 years, before they've had a chance to be defleured, so each guy can call his wife his own. The whole concept of a honeymoon was devised so that the wife could get plenty of rest and nutritious food to help her conceive.
If women are married and pregnant by age 17, and continue to get pregnant on a regular basis throughout their season fertility, they'll be happy. Because Paul says, "The woman is perfected by housework and childrearing." By the time the woman is done raising her children and ready to enter the workforce, she won't attract unwanted attention.
Idle hands are the devil's tools, and an idle womb is the devil's playground. If a woman uses birth control, she's allowing her body to be used as a sterile flesh to sate the man's primal urge. Then, men who want a woman like that are going to hit on her! If a woman is fertile, only men who want commitment and children will hit on her.
That solves the whole problem.
If a woman receives tactile attention, it's best to take it as a compliment, because it means the guy thinks she is attractive. Some men are boors. People just have to live with it. It's impolite, but not illegal; as if someone asked for the time and there other person said, "Buy a watch, you loser!"
But harassment is determined by whether or not the woman finds the harasser attractive. It must get the guy what he wants most of the time, or he wouldn't do it. You don't keep fishing where you don't catch fish! Harassment is the same way. What ever happened to common sense?
Also, heels thrust the woman's body into a courtship posture, with breasts heaved and buttocks tipped. If a woman is going to wear shoes that do that, what does she expect? SHEESH!
But if a woman doesn't want boorish attention, there are ways to accomplish that. I was very attractive as a youth. I dated hundreds of girls. I was a body builder/fitness freak, partier, socialite. I was once accused of rape after I dumped a girl, because she was angry that I broke up with her. I didn't get into any trouble over it, but it happens a lot. I just told the cops that me and the girl kept dating for two weeks after the supposed rape. But still, women back then were nothing compared to what they are today!
My son is very attractive. He was living platonicly with a female roommate in college. He is a Baptist. One day he came home and his roommate was naked in the living room making out with another girl. They asked him to join in, and he told her to keep her private activities in her own bedroom, not the living room. These are girls in their late teens/early twenties!
And, women have been dressing extremely immodestly only for the last 50 years or so. That's nothing compared to the time mankind has existed. Men are genetically hard-wired to mate the female. They respond to the woman's body. The more skin they see, the more they respond. God made it that way. If a woman looks like trash, she'll be treated like trash.
On the other hand, no one is genetically hardwired to steal. Therefore, the analogy of blaming the woman to blaming the person who make items attractive to thieves is not valid. Not only that, but the flaw in such a comparison should be intuitively obvious to even the most casual observer! Therefore, it's intentionally contrived for no constructive purpose!
But you say, in cultures where women go topless, men aren't aroused by it. But the men do get turned on by topless white women visiting the same location! So, men don't get excited over having their babies nursed on dark breasts, but they do get excited about a white woman nursing their offspring.
I think that's because white women are the daughters of God. Everywhere on earth white females are the preferred mating stock. In Japan, which is about as far away as you can get, white women can make a million dollars a year as escorts. Japanese escort girls make only about 60,000.00/year.
So, it's really the white women who need to be modest in dress and bodily demeanor to avoid unwanted attention. But there's some really hot Arab chicks! I wouldn't mate with them, because I won't mate with any woman who hasn't been baptized. Now, if a guy hires a secretary because he's attracted to her physically, but she refuses to date him, he should be allowed to fire her, and hire another girl who will. But the guy should not be permitted to use threats to entice the girl to date him.
If it wasn't assumed that all young women fornicate, the only male attention they would receive would be aimed at the objective of marriage. If a guy knew a girl would never have intimate contact until marriage, he wouldn't approach her except with the intention of possible marriage. That is a noble intention, and any man who has that intention will treat a woman well.
Women suffer harassment because it is assumed they are willing to fornicate. If any girl is harassed, even the slightest bit, all she has to do is say, "I'm a Christian. I would never allow myself privacy with a man I'm not related to, much less any form of intimate contact!" Once one guy hears that, every other guy will find out, and the girl won't be harassed. But women love the attention!
We live in a world where women are just staying in the workforce throughout their season of fertility. Ideally, women should be married at about age 16 years, before they've had a chance to be defleured, so each guy can call his wife his own. The whole concept of a honeymoon was devised so that the wife could get plenty of rest and nutritious food to help her conceive.
If women are married and pregnant by age 17, and continue to get pregnant on a regular basis throughout their season fertility, they'll be happy. Because Paul says, "The woman is perfected by housework and childrearing." By the time the woman is done raising her children and ready to enter the workforce, she won't attract unwanted attention.
Idle hands are the devil's tools, and an idle womb is the devil's playground. If a woman uses birth control, she's allowing her body to be used as a sterile flesh to sate the man's primal urge. Then, men who want a woman like that are going to hit on her! If a woman is fertile, only men who want commitment and children will hit on her.
That solves the whole problem.
Women?
Whores.
Words mean things. Deliberate slander is sinful.
AwesomeMachine
Member
As a father, picture how you would want your daughter to dress, to get the kind of male attention you want her to get, so she is treated how you want her to be treated, and so other males have the same thoughts regarding her that you have. And, yes, there can be an entire nation of women who dress like prostitutes! The entire purpose of immodest dress is to entice men; because it stirs the man's passion! Otherwise, modest dress is much more practical and easy to live with.
Why aren't doctors turned on by naked bodies? It's not because they've seen everything already. It's because they have a clinical view of their patients. And young, attractive, single women don't see doctors much, because they're healthy, because they're young. And if they're sick, they're hardly attractive for mating activity! But every so often a doctor gets into trouble for dating a patient.
What about legitimate instances of harassment? If a guy doesn't know how to behave, someone must teach him. So, if a woman is offended, it's best to say, "That is very offensive to me! Do not do that again!" If the guy does it again, she should report it right away. Otherwise, if she reports it years later, everyone will assume she wanted it, and that she feels guilty about it after the fact.
Most people are pretty smart about this kind of thing. If a guy drops his pants in the elevator and asks for intimate contact, it should be reported to someone. But if a guy just uses offensive language, it's better to just correct him. If the guy exposes himself, it's illegal.
If a man grabs a woman in a sensitive area, and she doesn't like it, she should push his hand away, and tell him it's wrong to do that. That it's a violation of her person. I've never been sexually harassed, but I'd probably take it as a compliment. Finally, there is no sexual innuendo behind awesomemachine.
I made the nick when I used to chat in computer-support rooms. It actually referred at the time to my computer. Now, let's just face facts. If a woman doesn't want male advances, there are effective ways to prevent that. But women love the attention, and the power their bodies have over males. They relish it!
However, if a guy is casting director, and he's trading roles for favors, making it clear what is expected from the girl if she wants to be a star, most girls are happy to use their bodies to get ahead. It's only ugly women who blame males for doing that. It's morally wrong, because it involves fornication, and it destroys the soul, but it's not illegal to give or refuse a role depending on whether the girl would do a favor.
Why aren't doctors turned on by naked bodies? It's not because they've seen everything already. It's because they have a clinical view of their patients. And young, attractive, single women don't see doctors much, because they're healthy, because they're young. And if they're sick, they're hardly attractive for mating activity! But every so often a doctor gets into trouble for dating a patient.
What about legitimate instances of harassment? If a guy doesn't know how to behave, someone must teach him. So, if a woman is offended, it's best to say, "That is very offensive to me! Do not do that again!" If the guy does it again, she should report it right away. Otherwise, if she reports it years later, everyone will assume she wanted it, and that she feels guilty about it after the fact.
Most people are pretty smart about this kind of thing. If a guy drops his pants in the elevator and asks for intimate contact, it should be reported to someone. But if a guy just uses offensive language, it's better to just correct him. If the guy exposes himself, it's illegal.
If a man grabs a woman in a sensitive area, and she doesn't like it, she should push his hand away, and tell him it's wrong to do that. That it's a violation of her person. I've never been sexually harassed, but I'd probably take it as a compliment. Finally, there is no sexual innuendo behind awesomemachine.
I made the nick when I used to chat in computer-support rooms. It actually referred at the time to my computer. Now, let's just face facts. If a woman doesn't want male advances, there are effective ways to prevent that. But women love the attention, and the power their bodies have over males. They relish it!
However, if a guy is casting director, and he's trading roles for favors, making it clear what is expected from the girl if she wants to be a star, most girls are happy to use their bodies to get ahead. It's only ugly women who blame males for doing that. It's morally wrong, because it involves fornication, and it destroys the soul, but it's not illegal to give or refuse a role depending on whether the girl would do a favor.
Dressing like a prostitute is sinful.
I Tim 2:9
I grew up at a time when maxis were briefly popular. A teenage boy will have no problem being attracted to a woman in a burlap sack or a burka.
God forbid they have bare arms. And no woman should expect to be "grabbed."
This is just disgusting. No woman has to "live with it."
Embellish much?
Words fail me.
What rubbish. Yes, humans are hard-wired to steal — if they think they can get by with it.
You are a very twisted person. Not only are you mysagenist, you are a pitiful racist.
This is a lie, flat out. Men like novelty, true enough. Which explains why so many slave owners in the United States raped their slaves.
You must be a troll. No self-respecting Christian could possible write those loathsome words.
Again, you must be a troll. Men must follow their primal urges. Boys will be boys, after all, and they are not accountable in any way. You make me sick.
Proverbs 7:10 Behold, there a woman met him with the attire of a prostitute, and with crafty intent.
Sure you would. Because you're a guy and you just can't help yourself. Guys aren't supposed to have self-control. That's just for the skirts.
I think I may throw up now.
I was going to respond to AwesomeMachine but figured he was trolling and it was almost midnight last night when I read his post.
It's incredible there are men that think the way he does. I shudder to think of him expressing his views on sexual harassment and then segueing into his personal testimony.
Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.
It's incredible there are men that think the way he does. I shudder to think of him expressing his views on sexual harassment and then segueing into his personal testimony.
Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.
AwesomeMachine
Member
Scripture doesn't mention not to put a q-tip deep in your ear either. But that doesn't make it right.
- Status