More J6 need to know info

[canadyjd]

I'm not asking you to defend Trump. I hope Trump doesn't need defended as the charges against him are trumped up political charges.

I am trying to weigh your discernment and critical thinking.

You seem to think that a President can think about information and declassify it. I'm asking how exactly that works.

What is the declassification category? How are the classification notifications changed?

You seem to be arguing something you believe to be childish, trying your best to follow a master group. It just doesn't make sense.

And no...I'm having a fantastic day. Had lunch with my son and took the dog for a long walk.

Again, your “spin” about what I “seem” to believe is pure misinformation.

I have only stated DT’s legal argument that as POTUS, he doesn’t have to follow the rules concerning classified docs like everyone else. I haven’t stated I agree or disagree, only his position.

I also pointed out that your repeating dem talking points that to even suggest DT didn’t have to follow those rules is “disinformation” is, in fact and practice, the very thing you have accused the “sheeple” on the right of doing.

Your story above was interesting and glad you got to spend time with your son.

I am, however, becoming very bored with this dance and I’m going to leave it to you.

Thanks for the conversation

peace to you

 

[JonC]

Again, your “spin” about what I “seem” to believe is pure misinformation.

I have only stated DT’s legal argument that as POTUS, he doesn’t have to follow the rules concerning classified docs like everyone else. I haven’t stated I agree or disagree, only his position.

I also pointed out that your repeating dem talking points that to even suggest DT didn’t have to follow those rules is “disinformation” is, in fact and practice, the very thing you have accused the “sheeple” on the right of doing.

Your story above was interesting and glad you got to spend time with your son.

I am, however, becoming very bored with this dance and I’m going to leave it to you.

Thanks for the conversation

peace to you

No spin at all. I stated how it seems to me.

A man beats police officers, vandalized the Capitol, posts he will kill people on Jan 20, and you seem to think he should not be in jail.

A President, you seem to believe, has the power to declassify information by thinking about it. You can't exactly say how that information is then categorized or how agencies know it has been declassified.

Your defence of Trump is mostly based on cases where justice was not done (link Clinton, who should be in prison).

You seem to be one of those "sheeple" I was speaking of. But I'm just saying how it appears based on your posts.

I never said that Trump should be charged. He shouldn't. The Dem talking points is that he should. I believe the opposite.

 

[MrW]

Here's a cool story.

I interviewed a guy for a clearance (a TS5). He said that he currently had to leave the room when a manual was discussed because it was Too Secret information.

The funny thing was he wrote that manual, the project just didn't need a clearance at the time.

Funny. He wasn’t allowed to hear about the book he wrote.

 

[JonC]

Funny. He wasn’t allowed to hear about the book he wrote.

Yep. The way he explained it, most of the time it isn't the information but how the information can apply. Another told me it was how pieces could be put together. That's why it isn't a good idea to have one organization declassify something another classified.

It was an interesting job (did it for 3 years). But I didn't like working from home.

 

[JonC]

Oh....thread closed due to length.

Please feel free to start another on this topic (or one of these topics).