I have not put words in your mouth. To claim that the Holy Spirit inspires error is the logical conclusion of your argument if you insist the translations are scripture and the word of God.
You have tried to put words in my mouth or claim that I made claims that I did not make. I nowhere claimed that the Holy Spirit inspires error. You again improperly put words in my mouth that I did not say, and those words are not actually the logical conclusion of my sound, scripturally-based points. Your understanding is wrong.
I agree with the truth that the pre-1611 English Bibles are the word of God translated into English in the same sense (univocally) as the 1611 KJV is the word of God translated into English and in the same sense (univocally) as the NKJV is the word of God translated into English. Post-NT Bible translations are not made by the process of direct inspiration of God.
Writing for all the translators in the 1611 preface The Translators to the Reader, Miles Smith noted: “If anything be halting, or superfluous, or no so agreeable to the original, the same may be corrected, and the truth set in place.” Miles Smith observed: “No cause therefore why the word translated should be denied to be the word, or forbidden to be current, notwithstanding that some imperfections and blemishes may be noted in the setting forth of it. For whatever was perfect under the sun, where apostles or apostolike men, that is, men indured with an extraordinary measure of God’s Spirit, and privileged with the privilege of infallibility, had not their hand? The Romanists therefore in refusing to hear, and daring to burn the word translated, did no less then despite the Spirit of grace, from whom originally it proceeded, and whose sense and meaning, as well as man’s weakness would enable, it did express.”
The guiding of the Holy Spirit does not make believers perfect and infallible so that they are unable to make mistakes or errors in their interpreting, understanding, and translating of the original-language Scriptures.
Do you think that you are an infallible pope who makes no mistakes in his understanding and interpreting of Scripture?