Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You are no idealist my brother. But is that how Christ wants it to be?We are Baptist because that's who were are!... I'm a particular type of Baptist... I am an Old Line Sovereign Grace Primitive Baptist... How can someone who embraces the Total Depravity of Calvinist Baptist which is an essential doctrine, compromise this doctrine with Baptist who are free-willers?... Can you mix the Sovereign Grace of God and the works of man?... Brethren its NEVER going to happen?
That is why there are so many isims, schisms, splits and divisions... And NEVER the twain shall meet... I have been watching for almost twenty years on here this interaction between them and I know whereof I speak... Hobie should check his Baptist history and then maybe he would understand why there are so many, and why they cannot worship together... You will NEVER see Primitive which I am, Calvinist which some other are and Free-will Baptist holding hands around the camp fire singing Kumbaya... Brother Glen![]()
That’s a start... perhaps all that is importantThis is true we don't agree on much of anything except that Jesus saves.
MB
Well, John baptized where there was much water.Under Great Lakes.... boy when you immerse - you really immerse!
Since we were given a repository of faith & practice, but not given a specific name, the doctrine must be more important than the name.The question is: Which is more important the doctrine or the Baptist name?
If a majority of Baptist congregations were to compromise on an essential doctrine would you be willing to abandon the Baptist name to preserve the doctrines that we currently prize so highly?
never do that in lake Superior, as its 34 degrees year round!Under Great Lakes.... boy when you immerse - you really immerse!
reminds me of while back in AOG church, when elder friend of the local IFB church liked to brag that they followed the way of John the Baptist being a Baptist, then my friend would remind him that "John baptized in water, while we follow the one who baptized in the Holy Ghost!"Since we were given a repository of faith & practice, but not given a specific name, the doctrine must be more important than the name.
I like the name, which, though it covers a wide spread practically, generally stands for those who believe the basics (or fundamentals) of Bible doctrine (such as virgin birth, inspired Bible, salvation by grace) and also covers Baptist distinctives such as believers' immersion, congregational government, priesthood of believers, etc. I don't think we have to abandon the name to preserve the doctrines, but if the name became closely associated with some kind of heresy, I would be willing to give it up.
In my own personal experience, though, the churches I have seen remove the name usually have been those more liberal and progressive. Maybe they will eventually give up the name and leave it for the rest of us.![]()
There is actually a trend within Baptist churches to remove "baptist" from the name of the church, in an effort to avoid the baggage that term has acquired.This is just something I was pondering and wanted to see others opinions.
The people known as Baptists have only existed a few hundred years. However those holding to the the doctrines Baptists teach have existed since the days of the apostles. Where are they now? Most are footnotes in history as they compromised in one area or overly focused on another and thus lost the true faith once delivered to the saints. A remnant moved on and are know known as Baptists.
The question is: Which is more important the doctrine or the Baptist name?
If a majority of Baptist congregations were to compromise on an essential doctrine would you be willing to abandon the Baptist name to preserve the doctrines that we currently prize so highly?
think that it really happens in an area that has been heavy RCC, as my church several members and some of the pastors ex RCC, so chose not to have Baptist labels that title is seen as being 'evil" among many Catholics for daring to convert them!There is actually a trend within Baptist churches to remove "baptist" from the name of the church, in an effort to avoid the baggage that term has acquired.
think that it really happens in an area that has been heavy RCC, as my church several members and some of the pastors ex RCC, so chose not to have Baptist labels that title is seen as being 'evil" among many Catholics for daring to convert them!
The concern is not the immerse part. It's getten 'em back un-immersed that makes a good baptist.Well, John baptized where there was much water.![]()
never do that in lake Superior, as its 34 degrees year round!
"Superior, they said, never gives up her dead."The concern is not the immerse part. It's getten 'em back un-immersed that makes a good baptist.
When the gales of November come early."Superior, they said, never gives up her dead."
'They might have split-up, might have capsized, or even dove deep and took on water!"When the gales of November come early.
I like Gordon Lightfoot. My wife hates him.'They might have split-up, might have capsized, or even dove deep and took on water!"
She must really like then"sun down, you better take care if I find you creeping down my back stairs"I like Gordon Lightfoot. My wife hates him.
It's fun to pull up to a red light with my windows down and turn up the radio to "The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald" (although "Pencil Thin Mustache" works better) and watch my wife hide.
Every Christian is a Baptist since all Christian sects follow Jesus command to make disciples and baptize. The difference is at what time do we baptize someone.