• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Must we be "Baptist"?

MartyF

Well-Known Member
Yes, I must insist that believer’s baptism > infant baptism.

And that baptism is not required for salvation.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
We are Baptist because that's who were are!... I'm a particular type of Baptist... I am an Old Line Sovereign Grace Primitive Baptist... How can someone who embraces the Total Depravity of Calvinist Baptist which is an essential doctrine, compromise this doctrine with Baptist who are free-willers?... Can you mix the Sovereign Grace of God and the works of man?... Brethren its NEVER going to happen?

That is why there are so many isims, schisms, splits and divisions... And NEVER the twain shall meet... I have been watching for almost twenty years on here this interaction between them and I know whereof I speak... Hobie should check his Baptist history and then maybe he would understand why there are so many, and why they cannot worship together... You will NEVER see Primitive which I am, Calvinist which some other are and Free-will Baptist holding hands around the camp fire singing Kumbaya... Brother Glen:)
You are no idealist my brother. But is that how Christ wants it to be?
 

rlvaughn

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The question is: Which is more important the doctrine or the Baptist name?
If a majority of Baptist congregations were to compromise on an essential doctrine would you be willing to abandon the Baptist name to preserve the doctrines that we currently prize so highly?
Since we were given a repository of faith & practice, but not given a specific name, the doctrine must be more important than the name.

I like the name, which, though it covers a wide spread practically, generally stands for those who believe the basics (or fundamentals) of Bible doctrine (such as virgin birth, inspired Bible, salvation by grace) and also covers Baptist distinctives such as believers' immersion, congregational government, priesthood of believers, etc. I don't think we have to abandon the name to preserve the doctrines, but if the name became closely associated with some kind of heresy, I would be willing to give it up.

In my own personal experience, though, the churches I have seen remove the name usually have been those more liberal and progressive. Maybe they will eventually give up the name and leave it for the rest of us. :)
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Since we were given a repository of faith & practice, but not given a specific name, the doctrine must be more important than the name.

I like the name, which, though it covers a wide spread practically, generally stands for those who believe the basics (or fundamentals) of Bible doctrine (such as virgin birth, inspired Bible, salvation by grace) and also covers Baptist distinctives such as believers' immersion, congregational government, priesthood of believers, etc. I don't think we have to abandon the name to preserve the doctrines, but if the name became closely associated with some kind of heresy, I would be willing to give it up.

In my own personal experience, though, the churches I have seen remove the name usually have been those more liberal and progressive. Maybe they will eventually give up the name and leave it for the rest of us. :)
reminds me of while back in AOG church, when elder friend of the local IFB church liked to brag that they followed the way of John the Baptist being a Baptist, then my friend would remind him that "John baptized in water, while we follow the one who baptized in the Holy Ghost!"
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
This is just something I was pondering and wanted to see others opinions.
The people known as Baptists have only existed a few hundred years. However those holding to the the doctrines Baptists teach have existed since the days of the apostles. Where are they now? Most are footnotes in history as they compromised in one area or overly focused on another and thus lost the true faith once delivered to the saints. A remnant moved on and are know known as Baptists.
The question is: Which is more important the doctrine or the Baptist name?
If a majority of Baptist congregations were to compromise on an essential doctrine would you be willing to abandon the Baptist name to preserve the doctrines that we currently prize so highly?
There is actually a trend within Baptist churches to remove "baptist" from the name of the church, in an effort to avoid the baggage that term has acquired.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
There is actually a trend within Baptist churches to remove "baptist" from the name of the church, in an effort to avoid the baggage that term has acquired.
think that it really happens in an area that has been heavy RCC, as my church several members and some of the pastors ex RCC, so chose not to have Baptist labels that title is seen as being 'evil" among many Catholics for daring to convert them!
 

tyndale1946

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
think that it really happens in an area that has been heavy RCC, as my church several members and some of the pastors ex RCC, so chose not to have Baptist labels that title is seen as being 'evil" among many Catholics for daring to convert them!

Well I'm proud to wear the label of an Old Line Sovereign Grace Primitive BAPTIST... You try to take the name BAPTIST off of our church, who btw the way was the forerunner of Jesus, John The Baptist and baptized him by immersion and that's where we got our name... You may incite a rebellion... Its true I'm a Christian first and that being said I'm a Primitive Baptist one!... Brother Glen:)

I forgot we believe in believers baptism ONLY, we don't baptize babies!
 
Last edited:

rlvaughn

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
When I was a young man, it was fairly common to hear "Baptist" touted as a/the scriptural name for the church (at least I heard it in this area). I think much of that was a push back against the Church of Christ, who were always saying that they had the scriptural name.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
'They might have split-up, might have capsized, or even dove deep and took on water!"
I like Gordon Lightfoot. My wife hates him.

It's fun to pull up to a red light with my windows down and turn up the radio to "The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald" (although "Pencil Thin Mustache" works better) and watch my wife hide.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I like Gordon Lightfoot. My wife hates him.

It's fun to pull up to a red light with my windows down and turn up the radio to "The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald" (although "Pencil Thin Mustache" works better) and watch my wife hide.
She must really like then"sun down, you better take care if I find you creeping down my back stairs"
 

Washad

Member
Rlvaughn#25
Thank you. Yes I agree that it is usually the more liberal churches who drop the baptist title, usually after dropping some biblical doctrine in an attempt to "draw in" more people.
Van#28
Yes, baggage is usually the reason given. I would like to know what that baggage is though. Of course that would vary from church to church. It would be something I would want to know before I joined that local body.
Rlvaughn#33
I have sometimes wondered how many of the teachings I heard growing up were reactionary to certain events/movements in their history. Some seem obvious but that just leads starts one to thinking...
 

AustinC

Well-Known Member
Every Christian is a Baptist since all Christian sects follow Jesus command to make disciples and baptize. The difference is at what time do we baptize someone.
 
Top