Uh, No thanks, I'll have to stick with the Bible on this one.For answers to all this, read Bridges' The Pursuit of Holiness.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Uh, No thanks, I'll have to stick with the Bible on this one.For answers to all this, read Bridges' The Pursuit of Holiness.
Uh, No thanks, I'll have to stick with the Bible on this one. </font>[/QUOTE]Where do you think the book's support comes from? Aren't you always ready to quote other authors, such as Gill? What's the matter - only read books that support your view? Don't take the "only the Bible standpoint" when your other points deny it.Originally posted by QuickeningSpirit:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> For answers to all this, read Bridges' The Pursuit of Holiness.
Uh, No thanks, I'll have to stick with the Bible on this one. </font>[/QUOTE]Where do you think the book's support comes from? Aren't you always ready to quote other authors, such as Gill? What's the matter - only read books that support your view? Don't take the "only the Bible standpoint" when your other points deny it. </font>[/QUOTE]Gill isn't right on everything,, but I don't need your suggested reading because I already know it is extra-biblical.Originally posted by ScottEmerson:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by QuickeningSpirit:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> For answers to all this, read Bridges' The Pursuit of Holiness.
Haha. That's really funny. That's a great way to remain stagnant in your understanding of the Scriptures and remain in the dark, but whatever works for you.Originally posted by QuickeningSpirit:
Gill isn't right on everything,, but I don't need your suggested reading because I already know it is extra-biblical.
JWs are steadfast and sure on many things, but that doesn't make them right, now, does it?I am already stedfast and sure of the doctrines of repentence and holy living.
I think you need to read a book because you're contradicting yourself in two consecutive passages. So, are we forgiven of all sins or are we not forgiven of all sins?...I referred to the Judgement Seat of Christ to prove the point of sin must be continued to be confessed, that which is not already forgiven because it is active in the life of the believer...I do understand completely that we are forgiven of all sin.
The NT clearly shows that preaching should be done for the church, so your point is moot and, well, silly.Does this mean by yours and DD's reasoning, that the "my people" in II Chronicles and Isaiah 58 can only be Israel, but yet we find Isaiah told to "cry aloud", indicating preaching, that Christians don't need preaching anymore after salvation?
So when God talks about destroying His people and banishing them from His sight, does that mean He will kick Christians out of His family as well?Well? Don't we as Christians still need preaching to show us our transgression?
I have to conclude when the Lord says my people, being I have been adopted into His family, I am one of "His people". And yes, we need the devil preached out of us!
Your quote: "And yes, we need the devil preached out of us" speaks for itself. With what I've seen of your theology, I wasn't surprised to hear that you thought that the devil could endwell a person.Originally posted by QuickeningSpirit:
Scott Emerson, the notorious doctor of SPIN!
SPIN-it, Baby!
You're right, the devil can't indwell a Christian, but you've proven he can get others to use his technique: SPIN-it, Doc!
Amazing how we little dwarfs of spirituality can understand these things, but you doctors still need a library of commentaries.![]()
So how does that relate to your "all our sins are forgiven"/"not all our sins are forgiven" contradiction? Which one is it?Originally posted by QuickeningSpirit:
[QB] You made it a "blatant contradiction" by your failure to realize the "devil" was in us from our birth. Everytime we go back to our old nature, which is not eradicated, as evidenced in your replies, yes, the "devil" does need to be preached out of us.
*ad hominem snipped*
So how does that relate to your "all our sins are forgiven"/"not all our sins are forgiven" contradiction? Which one is it? </font>[/QUOTE]O.K., since you just can't seem to come to terms on this one, let me ask you this question and see if it helps you:Originally posted by ScottEmerson:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by QuickeningSpirit:
[QB] You made it a "blatant contradiction" by your failure to realize the "devil" was in us from our birth. Everytime we go back to our old nature, which is not eradicated, as evidenced in your replies, yes, the "devil" does need to be preached out of us.
What!? I didn't know catholics could post in this part of the board.Originally posted by Daniel David:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Walls:
After that are current sins are not forgiven until confessed.
I wish you could examine your statement and see, Scott, the reason people don't love is because of pride, hateful pride, a lack of understanding and eaten up with the lack of true compassion.Originally posted by QuickeningSpirit:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Personally, and from talking to unbelievers, pride isn't killing outreach nearly as bad as the lack of loving others.
You are, indeed, forgiven. Paul talks about this all through Romans. It is not a license to sin, of course, but we are forgiven past, present, and future.Originally posted by QuickeningSpirit:
O.K., since you just can't seem to come to terms on this one, let me ask you this question and see if it helps you:
When you sin in your present state, saved I presume, are you just automatically forgiven and able to continue in that sin? Wouldn't this scenario leave Jesus in an open shame, with His Body still hanging on the Cross?
What does that have to do with forgiveness. If a person who received AIDS through a homosexual encounter gets saved, odds are that he will not be immediately cured of AIDS. However his sins are completely forgiven. Forgiveness is for the spirit, not the body.I believe your problem is that you can't differentiate between the flesh and the spirit. The flesh is corrupt, you sow to the flesh/sin, you reap corruption. Now wouldn't this corruption be the judgement of God against that sin? Yes.
So are you saying that if a person confesses all of his sins and then dies immediately that he will not have any wood, hay, or stubble. I think you need to read I Corinthians 3 again. Forgiveness is NOT an issue when it comes to what we will receive. It is based upon our works, but there is absolutely no indication that what we have is predicated on the amount of or sins we confessed.If you sow to the spirit, what do you reap? Life everlasting. Sowing to the spirit is never sin, it is what produces gold, silver, and precious stone, the stuff crowns are adorned with. Can't say that about wood,hay, and stubble, it won't stand the test of fire.
The attitude to sin as much as I want to is sin - Paul talks about that. However, the statement is, at its core, true. Any sin that a Christian commits is covered by the cross of calvary and is forgiven.Let me ask you to examine this statement:"I can sin all I want to and it's covered by the Blood of Jesus Christ." (specifically profaning the Lord's Name). Is this type of attitude not sin? Will it be dealt with as sin at the Judgement Seat of Christ?
Then show your Scriptures that say that I can commit a sin after salvation and that sin will not be forgiven.I'm afraid our sin isn't forgiven syncho-sematic, or automatically. I'm sorry if my statements earlier seemed contradictory, but you haven't deduced them in the context I posted them, thereby attempting to create a contradiction.
You are contradicting yourself again. We are either forgiven for all sin or we are not forgiven of all sin. You fail to understand that forgiveness of sin does not equal sinlessness. Forgiveness covers the spiritual consequence of that sin - being separated from God. That forgiveness will never be rescinded, according to the Word.In the sense of eternity, we are sinless, forgiven for all sin, but in our present state we are not sinless, needing continual repentence. The best way to put it in "layman terms" is that we are only 2/3 saved, the other third being the flesh, which will never be saved.
The judgement seat of Christ is not about forgiveness. We will be judged based upon our works, but confessing sins will not change what we have done. There is not a single verse related to the judgement seat of Christ that in any way says that it is our unconfessed sin that will be judged, nor that our unconfessed sin will turn into wood, hay, or stubble, which confessed sin will not. I Corinthians 3 and II COrinthians 5 are very specific concerning this. I think this is another extra-Biblical belief system you have.Why suffer judgement at the JS of Christ? especially since we can get that "washed" from our being before then?
Of course righteousness comes ONLY from Christ. But, the original question was about My people and what would and could happen if My people would repent.Originally posted by Daniel David:
HCL, where does righteousness come from? If Christ is the answer, then individuals must be righteous. Besides, nation doesn't mean political entity, but the correct interpretation is out of place in this thread.
And the point is that under our new covenant, "My people" ALREADY have their sins "forgiven."Originally posted by Headcoveredlady:
Of course righteousness comes ONLY from Christ. But, the original question was about My people and what would and could happen if My people would repent.
It is obvious that most Christians in America are not living Holy righteous lives. So, of course that nation is not going to be blessed.
150 years ago, slavery was acceptable. That's no more immoral than what is happening now. Society has ALWAYS been immoral.Why has America deteriorated morally? Do you really believe that America has always been this grossly immoral as it is today in 2004?
In today's world, "my people" have already repented - that's how they are God's people.So, the question remains, "Who are my people?" And what would happen if "My people" repented?
Yes, but His people have changed. The requirements to be the chosen changed drastically when Jesus Christ died on the cross.My answer would be that we would have much needed revival. If "My people" would repent.
Yes, this is very applicable. You can rant all day and night that this was only for Israel, but that is not true. God is the same today and yesterday.
And the point is that under our new covenant, "My people" ALREADY have their sins "forgiven."Originally posted by ScottEmerson:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Headcoveredlady:
Of course righteousness comes ONLY from Christ. But, the original question was about My people and what would and could happen if My people would repent.
It is obvious that most Christians in America are not living Holy righteous lives. So, of course that nation is not going to be blessed.
150 years ago, slavery was acceptable. That's no more immoral than what is happening now. Society has ALWAYS been immoral.Why has America deteriorated morally? Do you really believe that America has always been this grossly immoral as it is today in 2004?
In today's world, "my people" have already repented - that's how they are God's people.So, the question remains, "Who are my people?" And what would happen if "My people" repented?
Yes, but His people have changed. The requirements to be the chosen changed drastically when Jesus Christ died on the cross. </font>[/QUOTE]So according to you since those who are born again have repented once that is all that is neccesary? It is ok if one continues to sin; say a gossip or someone who is covetous? It is ok to continue as long as they were once born again they can continue in this sin? Is that what you and your partner are implying?My answer would be that we would have much needed revival. If "My people" would repent.
Yes, this is very applicable. You can rant all day and night that this was only for Israel, but that is not true. God is the same today and yesterday.
I'm saying that those who are born again have been forgiven all that is necessary.Originally posted by Headcoveredlady:
So according to you since those who are born again have repented once that is all that is neccesary?
Is it okay? Not at all. Sin is still sin. But forgiveness is eternal.It is ok if one continues to sin; say a gossip or someone who is covetous?
Is it okay? Not at all. Sin is still sin. But forgiveness is eternal.It is ok to continue as long as they were once born again they can continue in this sin?
Sin is wrong. Forgiveness is eternal. Can you find Biblical support that says that forgiveness somehow doesn't apply to the sins we commit in the future after our salvific experience?Is that what you and your partner are implying?
I could almost see those shaking that "fist" in the face of God. Demanding forgiveness, looking a gift horse in the mouth. The one who receives is not to look into the mouth of the horse and see he is unhealthy and deny the gift, but after receiving that gift, he would be abusive to not do anything about the "disease" likely to be found. The result being certain pain and discomfort ending in death, even causing others to contract the same disease.I would encourage you to continue studying the doctrine of forgiveness. It is a dangerous and unbiblical notion to somehow think that we can do things that fall outside of the realm of forgiveness as CHristians. Once we're forgiven, we're FORGIVEN! It is because of this forgiveness that we strive to live lives worthy of the calling of Christ.