The section of the OP which precedes this section I am in large part in agreement with, with the exception of see a "negative" in regards to the transition from death to life, for example, as I see it as a matter of a positive (positively removes us from a state of having no life).
E. Without regeneration man living prior to the cross universally would be:
1. Without the LIFE,
This is true. And this was the case.
We know this because the means, the Provision, for Eternal Life...is Christ. There is a set point in time when the True Bread came from Heaven. The "bread" which is contrasted with manna is, Christ states...
...His flesh. "His flesh" is the offering up of Himself, of, His death upon the Cross in the stead of the sinner.
John 5:39-40
King James Version (KJV)
39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.
40 And ye will not come to me, that ye might have life.
Remember the Lawyer who asked, "What shall I do to have eternal life?" Remember Christ's response?
Luke 10:25-28
King James Version (KJV)
25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?
26 He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?
27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.
28 And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.
A few things to consider:
1. The Lawyer mistakenly thinks eternal life is a result of keeping the Law;
2. Christ confirms that if a man kept the law He would inherit eternal life (the problem being no-one could, save Christ only);
3. Christ does not imply this is possible for the man;
4. Christ does not negate or nullify that He is the Provision for eternal life.
It is true that if a man could keep the Law he could be declared righteous, and when he dies, he could push through the Angels, stroll up to the throne, and say, "Move over, there's two of us now."
But that was never a possibility, and what this would do is make eternal life a payment of debt, rather than the Gift of God.
Galatians 3:21-22
King James Version (KJV)
21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
We are just not going to impose the realization of God's promises prior to Christ, nor prior to Pentecost.
Christ does confirm this Lawyer could obtain eternal life if he kept the Law, but, like Paul, He many times affirms that no man could do this. That is why the New Covenant was promised. This Lawyer was one who searched the Scriptures, and thought that eternal life was in them, rather than in Him that had given them.
So I agree with this...
E. Without regeneration man living prior to the cross universally would be:
1. Without the LIFE,
They were without the Life Christ came to obtain and bestow.
Prior to the Cross and Pentecost...they were under Law. This did not mean they were competely devoid of relationship with God, for God has interacted with man since the Fall, His Spirit coming upon men for the purpose of empowering them to ministry towards fallen man. Did they listen?
John 5:45-47
King James Version (KJV)
45 Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust.
46 For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me; for he wrote of me.
47 But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?
They searched the Scriptures, and trusted in...Christ? Is that what the Lord states here?
Perhaps we might think, "Well, He's just speaking about those who didn't have faith."
Romans 3:1-2; 9-10
King James Version (KJV)
1 What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision?
2 Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.
9 What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin;
10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
There is no room for "There is none righteous (except for those who had faith)...no not one."
It is clear, it has been proved that despite having the Word of God, it still remained...Jew and Gentile alike are all under sin. He validates this Bible Basic with Scripture...there is none righteous, no...
...not one.
Righteous from a temporal perspective, yes, but not righteous according to the Eternal Standard, which requires the imputation of Christ's Righteousness, namely that which is through His flesh, His offering up opf Himself.
Continued...