Agreed...but interestingly enough it’s almost here in the guise of states rights. Over 25 years ago, the socialist state of New Jersey tried to take my Cerebral palsy sister away from us and make her a ward of the state...under NJ state law they thought they could do it, however not under Pennsylvania law ( some other states also )....we would have just moved. In our country, we have freedom to run if necessary....apparently not in the UK.Hadn’t considered this scenario, but seems totally plausable considering his replies!!!
This would be a terrible cloud hanging overhead. But this is exactly what WE would have under a progressive utopian dream.
shouldnt that have been the decision of the parents, not the courts?It was nothing to do with the Government: the courts adjudicated a dispute between the parents, the hospital and the representatives of Alfie as to what was in Alfie's best interests. Theresa May and her Government had no say in it whatsoever, being subject to the Courts the same as everyone else. The reason the Courts decided that it wasn't in Alfie's best interests to transfer him to Italy was that (a) all that the Italian hospital was offering was not a cure but palliative care coupled with artificially keeping him alive (equivalent to performing CPR endlessly on someone who's flatlined) and (b) because even moving someone being ventilated from one part of a hospital to another would have inflicted unnecessary pain and probably have hastened the end, let alone moving him from one country to another!