• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

NHS: Starving Alfie to death was just 'redirecting care'

Status
Not open for further replies.

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Hadn’t considered this scenario, but seems totally plausable considering his replies!!!
This would be a terrible cloud hanging overhead. But this is exactly what WE would have under a progressive utopian dream.:(
Agreed...but interestingly enough it’s almost here in the guise of states rights. Over 25 years ago, the socialist state of New Jersey tried to take my Cerebral palsy sister away from us and make her a ward of the state...under NJ state law they thought they could do it, however not under Pennsylvania law ( some other states also )....we would have just moved. In our country, we have freedom to run if necessary....apparently not in the UK.
It was nothing to do with the Government: the courts adjudicated a dispute between the parents, the hospital and the representatives of Alfie as to what was in Alfie's best interests. Theresa May and her Government had no say in it whatsoever, being subject to the Courts the same as everyone else. The reason the Courts decided that it wasn't in Alfie's best interests to transfer him to Italy was that (a) all that the Italian hospital was offering was not a cure but palliative care coupled with artificially keeping him alive (equivalent to performing CPR endlessly on someone who's flatlined) and (b) because even moving someone being ventilated from one part of a hospital to another would have inflicted unnecessary pain and probably have hastened the end, let alone moving him from one country to another!
shouldnt that have been the decision of the parents, not the courts?
 

David Kent

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Thanks for admitting that the courts make the determinations in these cases.

Th doctors decide on the best treatment for the patient . In this case the parents objected. The medical staff then applied to the court. The court had to decide. Withdrawing life support is not killing the child.
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
Th doctors decide on the best treatment for the patient . In this case the parents objected. The medical staff then applied to the court. The court had to decide. Withdrawing life support is not killing the child.
In America they could go to another doctor. No court would prevent it.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So you think threatening to kill doctors and nurses is Ok? Or forcing staff and patients (other children, remember) to run the gauntlet of a baying mob, telling said patients that the doctors are going to kill them, is Ok? You don't have a problem with that?

Dr Ravi Jayaram
I’d have a problem with his practicing medicine in the United States
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
So if you have no medical training you should have no say in your child’s treatment ? Can’t get another opinion/ seek other treatment. Not unless you have (I’m sure state-sponsored) medical training.

Wow.
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So if you have no medical training you should have no say in your child’s treatment ? Can’t get another opinion/ seek other treatment. Not unless you have (I’m sure state-sponsored) medical training.

Wow.
Of course they had a say: they were a party to the court case for goodness sake! Haven't you read the judgements?
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Medically qualified, that’s a laugh. This kid was given a death sentence, so why not give the parents say where and when Allie died.
They did: they had several days in court. The condition gave him the death sentence not the doctors.

My sister is a consultant paediatrician and, frankly, I find people making political capital out of this tragic case by trading her profession to be disgusting.
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
And now he’s claiming the parents “did” have say in the treatment which is absolute hogwash. The parents were prevented from even taking him home.
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Remember, he said, even with the parents being trained, that “perhaps” the parents can decide treatment.
I didn't say "have no say", I said it shouldn't be their sole decision.

If the parents were the medical experts you imply then surely they could have treated Alfie themselves rather than take him to a hospital
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
They did: they had several days in court. The condition gave him the death sentence not the doctors.

My sister is a consultant paediatrician and, frankly, I find people making political capital out of this tragic case by trading her profession to be disgusting.
Gee that’s too bad.

Some of us see this garbage coming here. Nothing wrong with discussing it and warning each other.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Of course they do. It is a matter of fact; there is nothing to 'admit' as if it were some kind of 'guilty secret'

That's right. That's what I said earlier in the thread. Once you check into the NHS, you are treated like government property. You cannot even leave and you are threatened with arrest and felony conviction if you do. The British doctors and judges have decided that they are the supreme medical authorities in the world--which contradicts the Cuban authorities, who say the same thing about the Cuban medical system, deemed the finest in the world by Michael Moore.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
They did: they had several days in court. The condition gave him the death sentence not the doctors.

My sister is a consultant paediatrician and, frankly, I find people making political capital out of this tragic case by trading her profession to be disgusting.
So what are you saying, that the parents were held incompetent in making life and death decisions for their own child?
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Th doctors decide on the best treatment for the patient . In this case the parents objected. The medical staff then applied to the court. The court had to decide. Withdrawing life support is not killing the child.

Do you even read what you are posting? That is just about what Americans have been saying about your socialized medicine for years.
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
And now he’s claiming the parents “did” have say in the treatment which is absolute hogwash. The parents were prevented from even taking him home.
So, what, are you saying they DIDN'T have a say in the proceedings. Weird how they're a party to the court action
..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top