skanwmatos
New Member
So you believe salvation is by good works and if you don't do good works and overcome the world you will be lost?Originally posted by Askjo:
The KJV said the morning star on Rev.2:28 is Jesus Christ, not satan!
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So you believe salvation is by good works and if you don't do good works and overcome the world you will be lost?Originally posted by Askjo:
The KJV said the morning star on Rev.2:28 is Jesus Christ, not satan!
Actually, not. The Greek "Ihsou" (Jesus) and the Hebrew "Yehshua" (Joshua) are the same word meaning "Jehovah Saves."Originally posted by tinytim:
Well the KJV blew it in Acts 7:45, and Heb 4:8, when it calls Joshua, "Jesus".
You will have to blame God for that one. He inspired a neuter pronoun.It (KJV) also slanders the Holy Spirit by taking away his personality by calling Him an it.
Actually such capitalization is a relatively recent addition to English grammar.Also the KJV refuses to acknowledge that God is the one that completes the work *He* began in Philipians 1:6. Who ie the "he" in that verse. Every good Christian knows that you must capitalize any pronoun referring to God!!
Why give the KJVOs more ammunition for claiming the rest of us are stupid by posting such stupid and easily refuted nonsense?This example was a problem in a Sunday school class a few years ago. If God is meant, then why did the translators not capitalize "he"?
Simple, they were only human, and they blew it!!!!
Originally posted by michelle:
Nothing like diffusing the issue yet again. If Lucifer really was referring to the planet Venus, then that would be most appropriate rendering in the modern versions, if this is what they have a problem with, in this word choice of Lucifer. Why did the KJV translators not render this Venus? You all know why.
Now, let me get this straight, johnv, with all due respects, you are saying what, that the Bible was referring to the planet venus falling from heaven ? that there was no being that actually falled from heaven, whatever word was used to describe or identify that being ? Isaiah was talking about the planet venus and not a being named Lucifer whom Jesus Himself said He saw fall from heaven and whom He called Satan ?
The reason term "Lucifer" was used in the KJV is because, since the 4th century Latin, it was a name for Venus, especially as the morning star, derived from a term meaning "bright light," or the verbal form "to shine brightly." The same word is used in other places in the Latin Vulgate to translate Hebrew terms that mean "bright," especially associated with the sky. (Job 11:17 and 2 Peter 1:19).
I already told you why! In 1611 the planet Venus was called Lucifer! And that is exactly how they rendered it! Today, another name for Venus is Morning Star, and that is exactly how the NIV rendered it! How many more times do you have to be told before it sinks in?Originally posted by michelle:
If Lucifer really was referring to the planet Venus, then that would be most appropriate rendering in the modern versions, if this is what they have a problem with, in this word choice of Lucifer. Why did the KJV translators not render this Venus? You all know why.
No, the passage is speaking of the king of Babylon! Read the context! It may have a secondary reference to Satan (I believe it does, anyway) but the primary reference is to the king of Babylon just like the chapter says!However, this passage is speaking specifically about Satan who fell from heaven.
The morning star is Venus.This can cause nothing but confusion to the believer who has NEVER READ the KJV of the Bible, as to who this morning star is.
morning star n. A planet, especially Venus, visible in the east just before or at sunrise.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Wrong again! The morning star is the planet Venus! Lucifer and Venus are the same thing!
There are many out there who are claiming the morning star is Lucifer, making Lucifer Jesus Christ (to which many people, such as Madame Blavatsky referred to as Christ - her christ who is Satan, or Lucifer), to whom he IS NOT.
No, the passage is speaking of the king of Babylon and using the brightness of Venus (Lucifer) as an illustration.God is not the author of confusion, and the KJV translators properly translated this word, to Lucifer, which means light bearer and morning star. The Hebrew word means bright one. Whether this is referring to the planet venus or not, that is not the intended meaning of this passage. This is speaking of the son of the morning, to the bright one who fell from heaven, speaking of Satan's fall from heaven.
So, are you saying that God, and the KJV, is wrong in verse 4 when it identifies the person being addressed "That thou shalt take up this proverb against the king of Babylon?" Do you really believe God is an idiot and can't tell the difference between the king of Babylon and Satan? Do you really think the KJV translators were so stupid they couldn't tell the difference between the king of Babylon and Satan?There are dual meanings to this passage that have been shown regarding this, but the main point is speaking of Lucifer who is Satan, and many generations of believers knew this to be the truth, and this is how it has been understood.
The word of God is not blasphemy! And the word of God says it is addressing "the king of Babylon." Why do you call God a liar?You are trying to concoct some new understanding of this passage in order to justify, and excuse a clear, direct and quite obvious BLASPHEMY against our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
Where is yours? How dare you call God a liar and an idiot! How dare you call the word of God blasphemy!WHERE IS YOUR FEAR OF THE LORD?
Which is one time more than it is found in the Hebrew original language manuscripts.The word "Lucifer" is found one time in the King James Bible.
There is an old saying regarding the bible. "A text out of context is a pretext." Verse 4 of that same chapter makes it very clear the person being referred to is the king of Babylon. He was great, then he fell. He was strong, now he is weak. He was a conqueror, now he is conquered. He was mighty, now he is cut down, just as he cut down the nations he first weakened through military conquest.Originally posted by pinoybaptist:
Okay, now, let's paraphrase Isaiah 14:12, and use Venus. Was the Holy Spirit then saying :
"How you have fallen from heaven, o venus, son of the morning star. how cut down to the ground you are, you who have weakened the nations."
Forgive me if I sound a little confused here, but, what is the spiritual value of us knowing about the fall of a planet ?
We praise the One who is Light! The One whose Light Shines Brighter than all the stars of heaven. The bible says Jesus is the Light.And johnv said that that hebrew word used was actually a praise word that means hallelujah. who was praising whom ?
You have confused two different words. What you have done is known as the root fallacy. Because the root word "heyel" meaning "shinning" is also the root word for "hallelujah" does not mean that everything that is shiny is Jehovah God.Was it supposed to be read or translated "how thou art fallen from heaven, give praise to the almighty one ?"
Actually you didn't follow his reasoning and arguments. You ran off into left field and tried to make him seem to be saying something he never said nor intended.I'm just following your reasoning and arguments here, johnv, no disrespect intended.
SourceThe King James Version is based on the Vulgate, the Latin translation of Jerome. Jerome translated the Hebrew word helel (bright or brilliant one) as Lucifer, which was a reasonable Latin equivalent. Yet it is Lucifer, the Shining One or Daystar that came to be understood by Christendom as the name for Satan, the Devil, and the evil Lord of the Dark. Christendom made the interpretation based on assumption that Isaiah 14:12 is connected to Luke 10:18 when Jesus said, I beheld Satan fall from heaven like lightening. This led to the erroneous conclusion that Lucifer is another name for Satan.
http://www.christiananswers.net/dictionary/lucifer.htmlMeaning: brilliant star, day star, shining one / Hebrew: heylel
This name appears only once in the Bible (Isa. 14:12). It was a title given to a king of Babylon to express his perceived glory. The KJV and NKJV translate the Hebrew word as "Lucifer," the NIV uses "morning star," and the NRSV uses Day Star."
Commentator Dr. Henry M. Morris states: "Although the prophecy [in Isaiah 14] is directed toward the earthly king of Babylon (Isaiah 14:4), here it goes far beyond him (he could never fall from heaven) to the wicked spirit possessing his body and inspiring his actions. Just as Satan possessed and used the serpent's body in Eden, so he does here with Babylon's king..."
Thus, the names "Lucifer" or "Day Star" have also long been applied to the fallen angel, Satan, the Devil.