Normalized Heterosexual Fornication and Lust on TV

[Inspector Javert]

The ones who want us to accept the heterosexual fonication and lust don't have to take legal action because we've already rolled over and assimilated it into our lives.

Attempts at legal action have been taken years ago.......and they have lost because of deranged perverts on the U.S. Supreme Court.
"I know pornography when I see it." <----remember that one?

......while ignoring all of the heterosexual fornication and lust that is accepted by us everyday is downright,wickedly sinful.

Who is "us"? I know few if any Christians who do, it isn't ignored. You are fighting against phantasms which are rare indeed.

because they think the behavior is okay.

They do not. You are inventing a pandemic which does not exist so that you might offer the cure.

MANY Godly Christians are bothered by, and separate themselves from, and seek to combat ungodliness in film, t.v. etc....MANY of them.

The old church turned the world upside down.

The Old Church was also refusing to allow actors in their assemblies too.

What is the church today doing?

Permitting actors in their assemblies.

rather than convince them you're right about an issue.

Are you trying to convince us you are "right" about an issue?
Looks to me like you are.

 

[Zaac]

I do not want you banned. Even after the Romney threads, and this latest one on Paul Washing Machine, your posts have a ring to truth to them.

That wasn't directed towards you SN. :flower:You and I have had our differences in the past, but we've left it in the past. But there's a certain individual on the west coast who wants me banned because he takes himself a tad bit too seriously. But no love lost for him. Anger has a way of making folks lose sight of some things.:1_grouphug:

 

[Zaac]

Attempts at legal action have been taken years ago.......and they have lost because of deranged perverts on the U.S. Supreme Court.
"I know pornography when I see it." <----remember that one?

The question was about taking legal action to make it acceptable not to keep it out.

Who is "us"? I know few if any Christians who do, it isn't ignored. You are fighting against phantasms which are rare indeed.

Us is you , me and every other Christian who has assimilated the barrage of normalized heterosexual fornication and lust into our lives. The only way you haven't is for there to be no tv, magazines, newspapers, internet, movies or any media outlets in your life. And as you are posting on the internet, that's obviously not the case.

They do not. You are inventing a pandemic which does not exist so that you might offer the cure.

They do too. It's just on ignore because they've got pet sins to fry.

MANY Godly Christians are bothered by, and separate themselves from, and seek to combat ungodliness in film, t.v. etc....MANY of them.

And many more incorporate it into their lives. It's extremely naive of folks in the church to think that the morality of society is deteriorating because of folks outside the church. It's deteriorating because the salt and light is wallowing in the filth with those outside the church.

The Old Church was also refusing to allow actors in their assemblies too.

Permitting actors in their assemblies.

Are you trying to convince us you are "right" about an issue?

You're talking about an issue. I'm talking about preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ in love and recognizng for the sake of the souls of many that alienating people is NOT the way to point them to Christ. Treating this sin as the worst when we've already done with heterosexual fornication and lust what they are now trying to do with homosexual sin is hypocritical and wars against leading folks to Christ.

The gay agenda is the same as the heterosexual fornication and lust agenda: To make it mainstream and incorporated into our daily lives as though it were as common as breathing.

That's what we've already done with heterosexual fornication and lust.

 

[Zaac]

maybe, but not so much in one particular area/issue!

So says Mr. extraBiblical.

 

[Yeshua1]

So says Mr. extraBiblical.

Does jesus, after saving us, demand us to become confirmed into his image, so would he condone one of his still wilfully engaging on Homosexual activites, with no intention to even try to stop that act?

And if you call me extra biblically, would that make you Mr Unbiblical then?

 

[Rippon]

you do not have the moral authority to pass standards on anyone.

In one (11/15/2013) of your "Apology to the Baptist Board" threads you said you would no longer use that sickening phrase. You have relapsed once again.

 

[percho]

Lust of the eyes is not a new phenomenon. Adam and Eve contracted a fatal case of lust when they disobeyed God. All of their progeny has it--along with lust of flesh and pride of life. Lust is a major factor of the totality of our depravity. Being born again increases the spiritual warfare. We realize how sinful we really are. But we have The Advocate, Jesus Christ, The Righteous.

Cyberspace skin shows are a modern example of the immorality which has been working in this country since at least WWII, maybe roaring twenties. War has a way of increasing fornication and adultery. There are many more opportunities for sinning. I recall seeing movies like: "Splendor in the Grass" when I was a young teenager. Hugh Hefner got started about this time too. Pornography is not a new issue--it goes to around the time of the ancient Greeks, perhaps further back in time.

The problem with the moral code, or the lack thereof, lies in the fact that sin is allowable if one is over 21. Also, we have redefined what sin might be: abortion is not murder, but freedom of choice; homosexuality is not abomination, but alternate lifestyle.

We are living on the edges of Sodom and Gomorrah. "Remember Lot's wife."

Even so, come, Lord Jesus.

Bro. James

Would it be fair to say that not only must the man be born again but that there must also be a change of the whole of creation, that is>

For the earnest expectation of the creation eagerly waits for the revealing of the sons of God. For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it in hope; because the creation itself also will be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. Romans 8:19-21 NKJV