• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Normalized Heterosexual Fornication, Lust, etc.

Bro. James

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
We seem bogged in the semantics of religious jargon. We need to reconsider the doctrine of depravity.

Mankind is depraved, by nature. He is not born sinning but with the nature to sin, which he does with much gusto in most regions. Sin is pleasurable--for a season. But the wages of sin is death, physical and spiritual. The gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ. This is very uncomplicated, straight forward, a little child can understand. Theologians have great difficulty. See John 3:5 and context.

The natural man does not go away at salvation, in fact it creates a warfare with the regenerated spirit. The mind is also unregenerated, creating more warfare. The process of sanctification takes a life time. Sometime we stumble. The spirit is willing but the flesh weak.

We have a tendancy to water down what sin might be. It is not what is wrong with something but rather what is right with it?

"Whatsoever is not of faith is sin" takes care of most every eventuality.

Even so, come Lord Jesus.

Bro. James
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
This is WHY......

You're TOTALLY missing the point which is to stop complaining about all the homosexual sin while indulging in the normalized heterosexual sin as though it's just a fact of life. We do it REGULARLY when we watch and listen to what the world watches and listens to.



The displays are what they are and are simply a factor of Christians not taking action when sin rears its ugly head. I'm talking about us indulging in the normalized sin as though it's not sin. We write it off as "not that much cussing", or "they didn't take God's name in vain too many times" or "it's just tv and if you're gonna watch anything, you got to put up with the gratuitous heterosexual fornication/lust scene".



I didn't say avoid it. I'm saying don't take active part with it.



And that's fine. It's just awfully difficult for folks to care about that sentiment though if you're in some rated R or PG-13 movie with them that has shown acrnal affection between folks. Or if you watch the stuff in the privacy of your own home, why hypocritically pretend to be against it when out in public which is OFTEN the case.




Same gender marriage isn't gonna put anymore morally disgusting stuff in your path than was already there. Gay people have not been waiting on a SCOTUS ruling to start their public displays.

They fit right in with the overwhelming majority of decadent, immoral heterosexuals who are doing any and everything in public.

I never like responding to Zaac...he has his mind made up [a hidden agenda], and waits to pounce on those who fall into his trap(s)!

And one more thing as to your comment: "Same gender marriage isn't gonna put anymore morally disgusting stuff in your path than was already there." If you think what we are observing now is bad, now that gays have won this battle, in California, we will overt displays of affection like never before. When a portion of society feel they are shunned or looked down upon, they tend to cover up or avoid open displays of their particular sin. Now that they are more accepted than before, those who kept their sin under cover will, in fact, begin to test the waters of social acceptance and freely display their sin.

Example: If America legalized prostitution, we would see it for sale in window-fronts like in some Europen and Asain societies. Right now, prostitution is not legal, and it is covert in its public displays for fear of breaking laws, and public shame [which I admit is not what it once was].

Overt displays of same-sex affection will be rampant. It isn't right now, but when I worked for the state of CAlifornia and had to take several trips to San Francisco several times a year, I was sickened with the outright display of same-sex affection taking place everywhere I went in the city [restaurants, gyms, sidewalks, stores]. You and I both know that homosexuality is not shunned, socially, in Frisco, and I firmly believe, now that this round of same-sex marriage has gone to the LGBT movement, we will see more couples overtly and openly testing the waters by displaying affection througout the state.

Today, our television coverages are full of coverage on gays being married all over the state. This is BIG news, and I guess according to what you said at the top of this OP, I should turn off the television in order avoid this form of sin.

ZAAC, do me a favor and Christ-like courtesy, by not taking my argument apart, sentence-by-sentence....as I do not really agree with your reasoning [and I say that out of love]? I believe you have one view, and I have another, and never the twain shall meet! You have made your views clear, and I believe I have too! So save some cyber space by just accepting the fact that your views and mine are on opposite sides of the aisle; like the family to the groom versus the family to the bride. Or, fans of one football team sitting in the east bleachers while the visiting team sits in the west-side bleachers. In other words, the divide between how you view same-gender sin and how I view it are too far apart to ever strike an agreement!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I never like responding to Zaac...he has his mind made up [a hidden agenda], and waits to pounce on those who fall into his trap(s)!

And one more thing as to your comment: "Same gender marriage isn't gonna put anymore morally disgusting stuff in your path than was already there." If you think what we are observing now is bad, now that gays have won this battle, in California, we will overt displays of affection like never before. When a portion of society feel they are shunned or looked down upon, they tend to cover up or avoid open displays of their particular sin. Now that they are more accepted than before, those who kept their sin under cover will, in fact, begin to test the waters of social acceptance and freely display their sin.

Example: If America legalized prostitution, we would see it for sale in window-fronts like in some Europen and Asain societies. Right now, prostitution is not legal, and it is covert in its public displays for fear of breaking laws, and public shame [which I admit is not what it once was].

Overt displays of same-sex affection will be rampant. It isn't right now, but when I worked for the state of CAlifornia and had to take several trips to San Francisco several times a year, I was sickened with the outright display of same-sex affection taking place everywhere I went in the city [restaurants, gyms, sidewalks, stores]. You and I both know that homosexuality is not shunned, socially, in Frisco, and I firmly believe, now that this round of same-sex marriage has gone to the LGBT movement, we will see more couples overtly and openly testing the waters by displaying affection througout the state.

Today, our television coverages are full of coverage on gays being married all over the state. This is BIG news, and I guess according to what you said at the top of this OP, I should turn off the television in order avoid this form of sin.

ZAAC, do me a favor and Christ-like courtesy, by not taking my argument apart, sentence-by-sentence....as I do not really agree with your reasoning [and I say that out of love]? I believe you have one view, and I have another, and never the twain shall meet! You have made your views clear, and I believe I have too! So save some cyber space by just accepting the fact that your views and mine are on opposite sides of the aisle; like the family to the groom versus the family to the bride. Or, fans of one football team sitting in the east bleachers while the visiting team sits in the west-side bleachers. In other words, the divide between how you view same-gender sin and how I view it are too far apart to ever strike an agreement!

same sex marriage an Abomination, as God already has defined to him what is real marriage, and THAt is not it!
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
I never like responding to Zaac...he has his mind made up [a hidden agenda], and waits to pounce on those who fall into his trap(s)!

If you say so.

And one more thing as to your comment: "Same gender marriage isn't gonna put anymore morally disgusting stuff in your path than was already there." If you think what we are observing now is bad, now that gays have won this battle, in California, we will overt displays of affection like never before. When a portion of society feel they are shunned or looked down upon, they tend to cover up or avoid open displays of their particular sin. Now that they are more accepted than before, those who kept their sin under cover will, in fact, begin to test the waters of social acceptance and freely display their sin.

I've been all over the world and all over the United States. trust me when i tell you that gays were not waiting for a SCOTUS decision to go out of control with public displays of affection. My gosh. they teach kids aabout homosexuality in school now right along with handing out condoms.

Example: If America legalized prostitution, we would see it for sale in window-fronts like in some Europen and Asain societies. Right now, prostitution is not legal, and it is covert in its public displays for fear of breaking laws, and public shame [which I admit is not what it once was].

What city are you in? I can go to any major city in the US right now and after a couple of minutes take you to locations where prostitution is right out in the open.

Overt displays of same-sex affection will be rampant.

It's been rampant right along with overt displays of heterosexual affection. When is the last time you went to NYC?San Francisco? Atlanta? Miami?DC?Boston? Chicago? Portland? LA? Amsterdam? Paris? London?

It's been rampant.


It isn't right now, but when I worked for the state of CAlifornia and had to take several trips to San Francisco several times a year, I was sickened with the outright display of same-sex affection taking place everywhere I went in the city [restaurants, gyms, sidewalks, stores]. You and I both know that homosexuality is not shunned, socially, in Frisco, and I firmly believe, now that this round of same-sex marriage has gone to the LGBT movement, we will see more couples overtly and openly testing the waters by displaying affection througout the state.

rd, it's like that in just about every major city in the US. My gosh. The Kraft salad dressing man is talking about getting "Zesty" while a fire burns off his shirt and they are releaasing a print ad with the guy naked and barely covered.

The AXE commercials are all ridiculous.
The Victoria Secret commercials are soft porn.


Neither heterosexuals nor homosexuals have a problem with their displays.

Today, our television coverages are full of coverage on gays being married all over the state. This is BIG news, and I guess according to what you said at the top of this OP, I should turn off the television in order avoid this form of sin.

Kim Kardashian and Kanye West spotlighted their fornication that produced a child all over the news too.

Turn it off. Don't watch it.

ZAAC, do me a favor and Christ-like courtesy, by not taking my argument apart, sentence-by-sentence....as I do not really agree with your reasoning [and I say that out of love]? I believe you have one view, and I have another, and never the twain shall meet! You have made your views clear, and I believe I have too! So save some cyber space by just accepting the fact that your views and mine are on opposite sides of the aisle; like the family to the groom versus the family to the bride. Or, fans of one football team sitting in the east bleachers while the visiting team sits in the west-side bleachers. In other words, the divide between how you view same-gender sin and how I view it are too far apart to ever strike an agreement!

Do me the favor and stop replying and I won't have to take apart what your argument says sentence by sentence.:laugh::1_grouphug:

As it stands, I'm STILL under the impression that you think I'm saying something that I am not. But oh well.
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
For Zaac!

Zaac said, "As it stands, I'm STILL under the impression that you think I'm saying something that I am not. But oh well."

So why don't you tell me what you are saying to the church, regarding same-sex marriage, and, in the eyes of the church - per the Biblical World View of the Scriptures - how, we as believers are to react to those who are infringing on the holy and sacred act of marriage?

I view your views as sympathetic to same-sexers; and that you believe the church needs to cut them spiritual slack!

So, right here and now, tell all of us on this board just what you agenda is when it comes to the homosexuality, same-sex marriage, practicing homosexuals in church positions such as pastors, deacons, and Sunday School teachers?

Why, when believers voice their dissatisfaction and proclaim their opposition to anything the LGBT movement is proposing, you jump in and make issues out of heterosexual fornication, etc.

Are you a gay sympathizer? That is my question to you, as it seems like it, in you round-house approach to the topic, where you never actually say anything about anything, other than try to pass the "guilt-trip" back to those who I think you see as "homophobic?"

So, instead of you asking the question(s), in order to take our responses apart, sentence-by-sentence; spen the time [as much as needed] to explain EXACTLY where you heart is when it comes to this topic.

Then I will not be inclined to write you anylonger, because I will finally see beyond what I see as a hidden agenda.

Thanks Zaac. I don't mean to come across hardcore towards you. But you stated it was I, who didn't really understand what you were saying. :thumbs:

So, go at it.....leave no stone unturned! Let the board know what your mission in life is regarding homosexuals and the Word of God, and you apparent ongoing and running disagreement with members on the board who oppose same-sex marriage and practicing - unrepentant/unremorseful - gays from serving active roles in our church. The place that is supposed to be holy and sanctified!!!
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Zaac said, "As it stands, I'm STILL under the impression that you think I'm saying something that I am not. But oh well."

So why don't you tell me what you are saying to the church, regarding same-sex marriage, and, in the eyes of the church - per the Biblical World View of the Scriptures - how, we as believers are to react to those who are infringing on the holy and sacred act of marriage?

I would pray that you respond the same way that you do when heterosexuals shack up.

I view your views as sympathetic to same-sexers; and that you believe the church needs to cut them spiritual slack!

Yep you're confused about my position. My point is that the Church needs to be the Church and stop mouthing off about homosexual everything while almost ignoring the equivalent from heterosexuals.

If the church stood up for what it is supposed to and treated your sons and daughters in their heterosexual sin [that you know of and have not started church discipline for!!!] the same way that the Church does homosexuals, some of you would get your feelings hurt.

So, right here and now, tell all of us on this board just what you agenda is when it comes to the homosexuality, same-sex marriage, practicing homosexuals in church positions such as pastors, deacons, and Sunday School teachers?

Stop being silly. I'm a preacher of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. You tell me what your position is when it comes to heterosexuality, heterosexuals shacking up, practicing heterosexual fornicators in the church PERIOD.

I pray that your response is Biblical and if it is, copy and paste it and you've got my position on all things homosexual.

I'm by far one of the most conservative folks on this board when it comes to God's word.:thumbsup:

Why, when believers voice their dissatisfaction and proclaim their opposition to anything the LGBT movement is proposing, you jump in and make issues out of heterosexual fornication, etc.

Do it consistently for the behavior out of heterosexuals and you won't hear my dissatisfaction. There are far more heterosexuals dishonoring marriage than there will ever be homosexuals who dishonor it.

Are you a gay sympathizer? That is my question to you, as it seems like it, in you round-house approach to the topic, where you never actually say anything about anything, other than try to pass the "guilt-trip" back to those who I think you see as "homophobic?"

You're hilarious. Are you a heterosexual sympathizer?

So, instead of you asking the question(s), in order to take our responses apart, sentence-by-sentence; spen the time [as much as needed] to explain EXACTLY where you heart is when it comes to this topic.

If you want to frame the conversation, start your own thread. I started this one to say what I intended to say. If you don't like it, politely leave and start your own.:wavey:

Then I will not be inclined to write you anylonger, because I will finally see beyond what I see as a hidden agenda.

Then I suppose you and many others have a hidden agenda to ignore the normalized heterosexual fornication and lust.

Thanks Zaac. I don't mean to come across hardcore towards you. But you stated it was I, who didn't really understand what you were saying. :thumbs:

And you don't. That's obvious. My stance on homosexuality is probably much more conservative than yours. I just don't run around acting like the morality of the world is gonna disappear just because homosexuals got a favorable decision from the SCOTUS. Especially when we don't make the same fuss about heterosexuals shacking up or fornicating.

Your church probably ain't much different from mine in that parents have kids who are heterosexually fornicating again and again and they know it. The same parents let them watch rated R movies, etc, etc. just as many in the church accept a certain level of heterosexual fornication and lust in their lives for the sake of entertainment.

So be consistent in the complaining or just shut up about it. It's difficult enough to present the Gospel to people as it is. The Church doesn't need the added burden of having to overcome the hypocrisy that so many already equate with everyone in the Church.

So, go at it.....leave no stone unturned! Let the board know what your mission in life is regarding homosexuals and the Word of God, and you apparent ongoing and running disagreement with members on the board who oppose same-sex marriage and practicing - unrepentant/unremorseful - gays from serving active roles in our church. The place that is supposed to be holy and sanctified!!!

Like I said. You're OBVIOUSLY confused about my position. But it was OBVIOUS that you were confused.:laugh:
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Welll Said.....

I would pray that you respond the same way that you do when heterosexuals shack up.

Within a New York minute...I would be all over that person like ants on a pile of pure cane sugar!

Yep you're confused about my position. My point is that the Church needs to be the Church and stop mouthing off about homosexual everything while almost ignoring the equivalent from heterosexuals.

Well....the problem is - in case you haven't noticed, brother - there is no SCOTUS decision about the rights of fornicating heterosexuals to be married and enjoy the same rights as same-sex couples.

The "rage" and current "fad" have nothing to do with heterosexual sin - which I know I am Scripturally and spiritually opposed to - but rather, homosexuals having the right to take upon themselves the "HOLY and SACRED" institution of marriage.

In my book, that is reason enough f all the "mouthing off" by those on this board. And when major denominations [Evangelical Lutherans, United Church of Christ, Presbyterian, and for a complete list of churches around the world, including some Baptist?] support the LGBT movement with conducting marriages, ordaining ministers of same-sex persuasion...there is just cause to focus our attention on the "Sin of the Day!"

For article on churches see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blessing_of_same-sex_unions_in_Christian_churches

That doesn't mean the church, and this means me, personally, have lost focus on other forms of heterosexual sins, God forbid. It just means, that when the north walls of your fortress are being attacked, you direct your forces and weapons to that weakest point during the attack to shore it up and support the efforts to quash the attack.

I can't speak for anyone else on this board, but no other forms of sin have become "lessened" in my battle to thwart the same-sex marriage goals.


If the church stood up for what it is supposed to and treated your sons and daughters in their heterosexual sin [that you know of and have not started church discipline for!!!] the same way that the Church does homosexuals, some of you would get your feelings hurt.

Again, I can't speak for others on this board, but I can't believe the pastors I know - on the board - would in any way treat those heterosexuals that fornicate and commit adultery differently or with LESS attention or focus.

Sin is and always will be SIN - hetrosexual or homosexual - and it will be addressed, and those who commit it will be handled.

Nevertheless, let me point out one difference between the two types of fornicators - heterosexual and homosexual - one is a natural form of sin (and it is still an SIN), while the latter is an unnatural act as well as an SIN, and it needs to be treated as such. Not natural and in line with what God intended when He created man and woman! Does that make it one less than the other? No it doesn't, but same-sex marriage is all the "rage" right now, and it is drawing the attention.


Stop being silly. I'm a preacher of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. You tell me what your position is when it comes to heterosexuality, heterosexuals shacking up, practicing heterosexual fornicators in the church PERIOD.

I do believe the above commentary on your commentary supports my response to your inquiry?

I pray that your response is Biblical and if it is, copy and paste it and you've got my position on all things homosexual.

Well, it is as Biblical as yours, and it seems to be more focused, balanced and intune with present day problems then your intense desire to redirect the argument!

I'm by far one of the most conservative folks on this board when it comes to God's word.

So you say? I would tend to believe you, if you weren't so intent on bemoaning the words of those who are righteously concerned with the latest attack on Christian morals and values: Same-sex marriage.

Not withstanding unlike you, I am willing to believe you mean well, by trying to get the rest of us to focus our action on all forms of sexual sin, both heterosexual and homosexual. Still, I find it rather curious that every time the subject of opposition to same-sex marriage is brought up; you jump on the dais and start thumping your chest and sticking your finger in our eyes, and accusing us - who are concerned over this LGBT attack on marriage - as forgetting heterosexual sins.

This is just not true, and I hope you will finally see this fact from my response in this recent commentary/response to my earlier response to you. At least, I hope so? If you can't see what I'm eluding to, Zaac, I am afraid that it is really you, not me, who is CONFUSED!


Do it consistently for the behavior out of heterosexuals and you won't hear my dissatisfaction. There are far more heterosexuals dishonoring marriage than there will ever be homosexuals who dishonor it.

As far as I have observed, I see no reason for your intense dissatisfaction. It is not like those on this board have turned a deaf ear, or spiritually ignored the sins of heterosexuals. I will say this for the last time: It is my belief that it is you who have missed the point..... Heterosexual sins are not being made legal by states and SCOTUS. It is same-sex sin, thus a reasonable, rathional person would clearly understand the urgency behind the church and its attempt to quash such moves.

I have not read anywhere, in any OP's, a pastor or layerson placing less importance on the other sins of man. Once again, it is you who continues to voice dissatisfaction - which is your God given right - which causes me to be complexed....but, after talking with you in these past few threads, I think I see where you are coming from, and that should make you feel validated when it comes to my dissatisfaction with your contuned dissatisfaction!

I pray we've both reached a form or facsimile of détente???


You're hilarious. Are you a heterosexual sympathizer?

I was being sarcastic....sorry. I am not good at comedy, which is why I became a standup pastor and not a standup comedian. :smilewinkgrin:

If you want to frame the conversation, start your own thread. I started this one to say what I intended to say. If you don't like it, politely leave and start your own.

Thank you for the offer to not respond to your OP's. I try to bitre my tongue with some of your over-the-top, sanctimonious OP's and comments. But, as Shammah son of Agee the Hararite (see 2 Samuel 8:11-17) demonstrated when he slayed hundreds of Philistines trying to plunder his field of lentils - for the umpteenth time - "Enough is enough!" I had to finnaly have my say, and I hope we have come to some form of understanding. :wavey:

Then I suppose you and many others have a hidden agenda to ignore the normalized heterosexual fornication and lust.

Now that, is nonsensical, silly, sublime, foolishness, reprehensible to even suggest, and just plain absurd!

And you don't. That's obvious. My stance on homosexuality is probably much more conservative than yours.

Your stance is covered with fluff and derogative accusatives against the rest of us, leaving me to question any form oc conservativeness! Sorry, but I tell it like it is!

I just don't run around acting like the morality of the world is gonna disappear just because homosexuals got a favorable decision from the SCOTUS. Especially when we don't make the same fuss about heterosexuals shacking up or fornicating.

Your church probably ain't much different from mine in that parents have kids who are heterosexually fornicating again and again and they know it. The same parents let them watch rated R movies, etc, etc. just as many in the church accept a certain level of heterosexual fornication and lust in their lives for the sake of entertainment.

So be consistent in the complaining or just shut up about it. It's difficult enough to present the Gospel to people as it is. The Church doesn't need the added burden of having to overcome the hypocrisy that so many already equate with everyone in the Church.

More fluff and unadvised accusations. I do not believe any pastor on the board is looking beyond any sin; we are just focused on the "Flavor of the Day" which happens to be same-sex marriage, and unnatural act; an unholy union; and a sacrilege against the Biblical World View of Holy Matirmony!

Like I said. You're OBVIOUSLY confused about my position. But it was OBVIOUS that you were confused.:laugh:

:wavey: I may have been confused....but thanks to the Lord; I am no longer confused, lost or headed in the wrong direction in my spiritual walk. I appreciate your attempts to unconfuse me as to your somewhat confusing arguments born of dissatisfaction and judgement against those of us, whom you are confused with because you seem to believe that we do not place heterosexual sins on the same plain as homosexual sins!

I did try to say what I said in Agape love. If you are offended, or if I stepped on your toe, a little tooooooo hard, please accept my heart-felt apology! I know we are both fighting the same war and the same enemy - the father of lies!

We may both be looking at this war from different parallels, but, when all is said and done, we roll up our sleeves and pitch in to defeat sin at its root cause [the flesh]. Shalom!
 

Oldtimer

New Member
Righteousdude2, well said, my Brother.

I can't speak for anyone on this board, other than myself. Your response does represent the view that I didn't have the words to frame with regards to this issue.

Zacc, right or wrong on my part, your position came across as someone stirring a pot of muddy water. Stirring up the sediment in order to cloud the issue of even more mud shoveled into the pot. A pot that we must swim in until our Saviour calls us home. Giving "official approval" to what God calls un-natural and an abomination is like a mountain of mud landsliding into our pot. Especially as a layman, I may not be able to clean up the dirty water in our pot, but I sure can try to pile up sandbags to hold some of that additional mud at bay.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Righteousdude2, well said, my Brother.

I can't speak for anyone on this board, other than myself. Your response does represent the view that I didn't have the words to frame with regards to this issue.

Zacc, right or wrong on my part, your position came across as someone stirring a pot of muddy water. Stirring up the sediment in order to cloud the issue of even more mud shoveled into the pot. A pot that we must swim in until our Saviour calls us home. Giving "official approval" to what God calls un-natural and an abomination is like a mountain of mud landsliding into our pot. Especially as a layman, I may not be able to clean up the dirty water in our pot, but I sure can try to pile up sandbags to hold some of that additional mud at bay.

Oldtimer, I bore of righteous dude and his sanctimonious sanctimony. All I have said is the church needs to act like the church and stop acting okay with all the normalized heterosexual fornicative and lustful activity that surrounds us as though it doesn't matter.

When is the last time you've heard a church talking about putting kids out who are engaged in heterosexual sex?

When's the last time you've heard the church say they didn't want openly heterosexual, filled with lust for littlr girls little boys in the Scouts?

There's a double standard because "homosexuality" is the church's pet "sin".

And like I've said before, all the world has to do is look at what the same folks who go off about everything homosexual are watching and listening to and allowing their kids to do the same in terms of heterosexual fornication and lust and it's obvious what I'm talking about.

So you say? I would tend to believe you, if you weren't so intent on bemoaning the words of those who are righteously concerned with the latest attack on Christian morals and values: Same-sex marriage.

Not withstanding unlike you, I am willing to believe you mean well, by trying to get the rest of us to focus our action on all forms of sexual sin, both heterosexual and homosexual. Still, I find it rather curious that every time the subject of opposition to same-sex marriage is brought up; you jump on the dais and start thumping your chest and sticking your finger in our eyes, and accusing us - who are concerned over this LGBT attack on marriage - as forgetting heterosexual sins.

This is just not true, and I hope you will finally see this fact from my response in this recent commentary/response to my earlier response to you. At least, I hope so? If you can't see what I'm eluding to, Zaac, I am afraid that it is really you, not me, who is CONFUSED!

I'm confused as to why he's now respoonding to himself. But oh well.
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Again, Another attempt to confuse the issues!

You said > "When is the last time you've heard a church talking about putting kids out who are engaged in heterosexual sex?"

I don't know about other pastors, [and I wish one or two would jump in here and say what I'm going to say] but, as a youth pastor and senior pastor, I have asked teens, young adults and even couples living in and practicing fornication or adultery, to let me pray for them after counseling.

~ And, here's something you didn't expect ~​

If those persons or that person did not repent, quit the sinful activity, and get back on the Narrow Path, they were REMOVED from the church, just like the Bible says to do in 2 Cor. 6:17 (NLT), "When is the last time you've heard a church talking about putting kids out who are engaged in heterosexual sex?"

Jehovah also reminds those who continue to practice an ungodly lifestyle (Is. 59:1-2) to, "Listen! The Lord’s arm is not too weak to save you, nor is his ear too deaf to hear you call.
It’s your sins that have cut you off from God. Because of your sins, he has turned away and will not listen anymore."

I think there are plenty of Scriptures that back up the shepherds decision to remove sinners from the flock, when those who conitune to sin, ignore attempts to be reach for the Kingdom!

Like I said, I don't know about others, nor do I speak for other pastors, but, as the leader, it is my number one priority to separate the chafe from the wheat in order to protect the flock.

So, to answer your question, or more like refute your point, I don't care if the person is a heterosexual or homosexual sinner, if they fail to respond to the truth of His Word, they will have to move on.

I believe Jesus showed us the right way to handle those who rebel and refuse to welcome the teaching of His truth, that, "If any household or town refuses to welcome you or listen to your message, shake its dust from your feet as you leave. I tell you the truth, the wicked cities of Sodom and Gomorrah will be better off than such a town on the judgment day." Matthew 10:14-15 (NLT)

Harsh method(s), but it is according to Scripture. I would not only do this....I have done it. There is nothing worse than an over-sexed, out-of-control teen [male or female], preying on the flock of teens in the youth group. That cancer must be cut off at the roots, after all attempts to refocus them fails; and there are times our best attempts will in fact, FAIL!

You said >"There's a double standard because "homosexuality" is the church's pet "sin."

I do not believe that. And like Oltimer said - you are stirring the mud of the pot, and I do not know why? Let's just say that your words become more curious with each attempt to counter me....

ONE last time: SIN is SIN! No church is taking aim at one over another. If it did or does, it will be judged accordingly. Just re-read the seven letters to the seven churches in Revelation!

And I am sorry that I BORE you! :laugh:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Zaac

Well-Known Member
You said > "When is the last time you've heard a church talking about putting kids out who are engaged in heterosexual sex?"

I don't know about other pastors, [and I wish one or two would jump in here and say what I'm going to say] but, as a youth pastor and senior pastor, I have asked teens, young adults and even couples living in and practicing fornication or adultery, to let me pray for them after counseling.

~ And, here's something you didn't expect ~​

Actually I DID expect you to come back with what you did. You're one of the rare exceptions if you did what you say. But the average church ain't doing it.

If those persons or that person did not repent, quit the sinful activity, and get back on the Narrow Path, they were REMOVED from the church, just like the Bible says to do in 2 Cor. 6:17 (NLT), "When is the last time you've heard a church talking about putting kids out who are engaged in heterosexual sex?"

So the parents or the kids came and told you they were still in the activity? Cause I'd like to know. This is new territory if the parents told on the kids and you kickec the kids out while the parents were still attending.

Jehovah also reminds those who continue to practice an ungodly lifestyle (Is. 59:1-2) to, "Listen! The Lord’s arm is not too weak to save you, nor is his ear too deaf to hear you call.
It’s your sins that have cut you off from God. Because of your sins, he has turned away and will not listen anymore."

I think there are plenty of Scriptures that back up the shepherds decision to remove sinners from the flock, when those who conitune to sin, ignore attempts to be reach for the Kingdom!

I didn't say there wasn't Biblical backing. I'm quite aware of the backing. Just not aware of the mass DOING when it comes to heterosexual "mischief" amongst youth.

Again, as an example, Baptists are upset that the Scouts are now going to accept homosexual youths. If the youths aren't having homosexual sex, what's the issue? We don't complain about the heterosexual boys lusting and threaten to stop sponsoring troops over that? Why don't we treat sin as sin?

Like I said, I don't know about others, nor do I speak for other pastors, but, as the leader, it is my number one priority to separate the chafe from the wheat in order to protect the flock.

And like I said, for the ones' doing it nondiscriminantly, Praise God for the obedience. But that is NOT what most churches are doing. And all you've got to do is visit them and see what's going on.

So, to answer your question, or more like refute your point, I don't care if the person is a heterosexual or homosexual sinner, if they fail to respond to the truth of His Word, they will have to move on.

And like I said, if you're doing what you say, unfortunately you are the exception and not the rule.


You said >"There's a double standard because "homosexuality" is the church's pet "sin."

I do not believe that. And like Oltimer said - you are stirring the mud of the pot, and I do not know why? Let's just say that your words become more curious with each attempt to counter me...
.

You don't have to believe it. It doesn't change it.

ONE last time: SIN is SIN! No church is taking aim at one over another. If it did or does, it will be judged accordingly. Just re-read the seven letters to the seven churches in Revelation!

And I am sorry that I BORE you! :laugh:

The facts refute what you're saying. And it's your fault that your consistent anti-anything I say message is boring me. But I still love you.:1_grouphug:
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Actually I DID expect you to come back with what you did. You're one of the rare exceptions if you did what you say. But the average church ain't doing it.



So the parents or the kids came and told you they were still in the activity? Cause I'd like to know. This is new territory if the parents told on the kids and you kickec the kids out while the parents were still attending.



I didn't say there wasn't Biblical backing. I'm quite aware of the backing. Just not aware of the mass DOING when it comes to heterosexual "mischief" amongst youth.

Again, as an example, Baptists are upset that the Scouts are now going to accept homosexual youths. If the youths aren't having homosexual sex, what's the issue? We don't complain about the heterosexual boys lusting and threaten to stop sponsoring troops over that? Why don't we treat sin as sin?



And like I said, for the ones' doing it nondiscriminantly, Praise God for the obedience. But that is NOT what most churches are doing. And all you've got to do is visit them and see what's going on.



And like I said, if you're doing what you say, unfortunately you are the exception and not the rule.


.

You don't have to believe it. It doesn't change it.



The facts refute what you're saying. And it's your fault that your consistent anti-anything I say message is boring me. But I still love you.:1_grouphug:

gay sexual relations are unnatural, and God sees them in a different light than fornication and adultary, for while ALL are sexual sins, the homosexual act is a pervsion of what God intended in creation, in institution of marriage, as a representation of Christ and the Church, one bond, and NOT same sex bonding!
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
gay sexual relations are unnatural, and God sees them in a different light than fornication and adultary,

You've made it clear how much you want that to be the case. But you don't speak for God. His word does. And His word shows that any sex outside of heterosexual marriage is unnatural and equally sinful.

As has been said, you're quite the proof that this is the Church's pet sin as you want to make heterosexual fornication appear to be seen by God in a different light than homosexual fornication.

for while ALL are sexual sins, the homosexual act is a pervsion of what God intended in creation, in institution of marriage, as a representation of Christ and the Church, one bond, and NOT same sex bonding!

The same would apply for ANY sex, heterosexual or homosexual, outside of marriage
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You know them by their fruits

You said >So the parents or the kids came and told you they were still in the activity? Cause I'd like to know. This is new territory if the parents told on the kids and you kickec the kids out while the parents were still attending.<

I say: After talking with the kids and parents [if, in fact, the kids' parents attended the church], I'd keep a close watch on their behaviors. If they continued to demonstrate the kind of behaviors that raised the "red flag" in the first place, they'd get another private session, and be told that they have not shown any change or made any move to change, and until they did, they would have to seek fellowship elsewhere.

We are looking a sin, and when we say to the person, your sins are forgiven, NOW GO AND SIN NO MORE! However, you see no change in the language, actions and spirit, there'd be no need to draw this out.

BTW - there were times members would come and complain about my style of leadership or preaching, and demand I change, or they'd find another church. Imagine their shock when I'd pull out the yellow pages right in front of them, and help them locate a few viable alternatives to consider for a new church home.

And thanks for still loving my "boring" ways and mannerisms! :smilewinkgrin:
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oldtimer, I bore of righteous dude and his sanctimonious sanctimony. All I have said is the church needs to act like the church and stop acting okay with all the normalized heterosexual fornicative and lustful activity that surrounds us as though it doesn't matter.

When is the last time you've heard a church talking about putting kids out who are engaged in heterosexual sex?

When's the last time you've heard the church say they didn't want openly heterosexual, filled with lust for littlr girls little boys in the Scouts?

There's a double standard because "homosexuality" is the church's pet "sin".

And like I've said before, all the world has to do is look at what the same folks who go off about everything homosexual are watching and listening to and allowing their kids to do the same in terms of heterosexual fornication and lust and it's obvious what I'm talking about.



I'm confused as to why he's now respoonding to himself. But oh well.

Do you agrre with Jesus that ALL Homosexual sex and practice is forbidden, immoral, unnatural, and sin?

That the person to be really saved would , by the grace of God, either be celebete, or else becomehetro in relationships?
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Do you agrre with Jesus that ALL Homosexual sex and practice is forbidden, immoral, unnatural, and sin?

Do you agree with Jesus that it's no more forbidden, immoral, unnatural or sinful than every other act of sex outside of god ordained marriage?

That the person to be really saved would , by the grace of God, either be celebete, or else becomehetro in relationships?


And THAT is COMPLETELY unBiblical. Did your sin stop once you were saved?
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Is there any sexual act that is a sin within the bonds of marriage?

Hey Saturneptune. Hope you're having a great Fourth!!!

Great question.

I believe Scripture says that the marriage bed is undefiled, meaning two married people can do whatever together. But that doesn't mean they can't defile it by bringing in someone or something that isn't supposed to be there.

They can still lust or try to add another person, etc. Those things are definitely sinful within the context of marriage.

That's how I explain it to couples who say it's okay for them to watch porn TOGETHER and that it's okay because they are married.

The marriage covenant with God does not give two people the right to sin against God.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Do you agree with Jesus that it's no more forbidden, immoral, unnatural or sinful than every other act of sex outside of god ordained marriage?




And THAT is COMPLETELY unBiblical. Did your sin stop once you were saved?

God Himself has declared that homosexual acts and practices are unnatural, so if a straight commits fornication, and a gay person sexual acts, God does indeed see them dirrefently, as while BOTH are sin, one is done in a natural intended fashion, other unnatural perverted fashion!

And are you advocating gay persons do NOT cease their lifestyle IF they are claiming to be saved now?
 
Top