Not all Drs are bought & paid for

[nonaeroterraqueous]

Not just knowingly, but enthusiastically.

Like watching hordes of people jump into a deep hole.

 

[Two Wings]

So political would be included in it, period?

late in seeing this thread ...

it's about being a threat.

refusing the flu vax is not resulting in denial of service ... employment ... denigration in society at large.

refusing the cv vax IS. Just as RevMitchell wrote.

Therefore, action is taken against the threat. I was asked to be a named plantiff in the Liberty Counsel suit against the Biden mandate. They had enough of "my kind" so I wasn't selected. I've never been involved in such a process, but this one is certainly worthy.

Hopefully THIS helps understanding.

 

[Wingman68]

https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/return-to-faith-and-love

With all the fun & games that we are enduring, which we should not be doing in a sane world, it is soothing to find people who just make sense.

 

[Two Wings]

https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/return-to-faith-and-love

With all the fun & games that we are enduring, which we should not be doing in a sane world, it is soothing to find people who just make sense.

wish he'd have abstained from the course language. that didn't add anything to the title of his book nor the discussion in this article ...

but in the substance, I agree. We have heralded the "shot of hope." The very thing which is likely to be the final countdown to our demise ... but then the narrative will be (as it's being birthed now already) "the problem hasn't been fixed because we have those who refuse the jab"

 

[Wingman68]

wish he'd have abstained from the course language. that didn't add anything to the title of his book nor the discussion in this article ...

but in the substance, I agree. We have heralded the "shot of hope." The very thing which is likely to be the final countdown to our demise ... but then the narrative will be (as it's being birthed now already) "the problem hasn't been fixed because we have those who refuse the jab"

That was not his book. Neither book referenced is his. Thanks for checking him out.

 

[Wingman68]

Where is the mRNA being used in humans since 2013? HIV? How did that work out? You should work for them, oh wait…..you already do, here, with moderator status.

• Fauci is the highest-paid federal employee in the U.S., and 68% of his $437,000 a year salary comes from bioweapons research
• Instead of safeguarding public health, Dr. Anthony Fauci turned the National Institutes of Health into an incubator for pharmaceutical products, and essentially sold the entire country to the drug industry
• Fauci has had a hand in creating the vaccine gold rush. In 2000, he met with Bill Gates, who asked to partner with the NIH in an agreement to vaccinate the world with a battery of new vaccines. In 2009, this agreement was rebranded as “The Decade of Vaccines,” the objective of which was to implement mandatory vaccinations for every adult and child on the planet by the year 2020
• One of the darkest stains on Fauci’s career, aside from his role in the COVID pandemic, was his handling of the HIV epidemic. Suppressing the use of repurposed drugs, Fauci zeroed in on AZT, a toxic drug that has killed an estimated 300,000 AIDS patients
• The similarities between the AZT scandal and what's happening today with the COVID jab and remdesivir are striking. Again, Fauci has suppressed all treatments using inexpensive and nontoxic drugs. U.S. taxpayers have paid for research, while drug companies have raked in the profits, all while having zero liability for injuries and deaths.

 

[Wingman68]

• Fauci is the highest-paid federal employee in the U.S., and 68% of his $437,000 a year salary comes from bioweapons research
• Instead of safeguarding public health, Dr. Anthony Fauci turned the National Institutes of Health into an incubator for pharmaceutical products, and essentially sold the entire country to the drug industry
• Fauci has had a hand in creating the vaccine gold rush. In 2000, he met with Bill Gates, who asked to partner with the NIH in an agreement to vaccinate the world with a battery of new vaccines. In 2009, this agreement was rebranded as “The Decade of Vaccines,” the objective of which was to implement mandatory vaccinations for every adult and child on the planet by the year 2020
• One of the darkest stains on Fauci’s career, aside from his role in the COVID pandemic, was his handling of the HIV epidemic. Suppressing the use of repurposed drugs, Fauci zeroed in on AZT, a toxic drug that has killed an estimated 300,000 AIDS patients
• The similarities between the AZT scandal and what's happening today with the COVID jab and remdesivir are striking. Again, Fauci has suppressed all treatments using inexpensive and nontoxic drugs. U.S. taxpayers have paid for research, while drug companies have raked in the profits, all while having zero liability for injuries and deaths.

The first cases of AIDS surfaced in 1981. Initially, the AIDS program was run by the National Cancer Institute, a separate institute inside the Health and Human Services Department (HHS). The general belief was that AIDS had a chemical etiology caused by drug use. This all changed when the HIV virus was discovered.

Fauci started working for the NIH in 1968 as a clinical associate in the Laboratory of Clinical Investigation at National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). He became director of the NIAID in 1984, the year after the discovery of the HIV virus, and was appointed director of the Office of AIDS Research in 1988, when that office was established. As explained by Kennedy, Fauci essentially built the NIAID around an AIDS drug called AZT.

“AZT was a chemotherapy formulation that was so toxic it killed all the rats when they gave it to them. The inventor of AZT felt that it was unsafe for any human use, so he didn't even patent it,” Kennedy says.

“Very early on, the National Cancer Institute had found that when you put AZT in a culture of HIV, that killed the HIV, not surprisingly. It killed anything it touched. And so, Fauci partnered with the manufacturer of AZT ... He guided that formulation through the regulatory process and tried to fast track it. He cheated terribly on the clinical trials.

In the clinical trials, it was killing everybody. It literally kills everybody who takes it. But he was able to keep the people in the treatment group alive by giving them huge numbers of blood transfusions. It does keep them alive for the eight weeks, and based upon that eight-week trial, he got approval for AZT. It was unprecedented.

As Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for discovering the polymerase chain-reaction (PCR) technique, said, with any chemotherapy drug, you're supposed to give it to somebody for two weeks. Chemotherapy is designed to kill every cell in the body, but hopefully it kills tumor cells first, and you can take the person off it. The tumor dies, if you time it right, and the person doesn't die.

If you put somebody on that for life, like Tony Fauci was doing, every one of them is going to die. And that's what happened. Meanwhile, there were a lot of drugs at that time that were being repurposed. Local, community-based doctors in San Francisco and New York who were treating the AIDS community were finding that these drugs treated the symptoms of AIDS, and they stopped people from dying.

Fauci made a deliberate crusade to sabotage those, to make sure they were not available to sick people, in order to make sure that AZT would be the only solution. And AZT was the most expensive drug in history. It was $10,000 for a one-year supply [while costing just $5 per dose to manufacture, plus U.S. taxpayers paid for all of the research and development of the drug] ...

Tony Fauci basically created this template that he then used over the next 45 years, to develop toxic drug after toxic drug. He killed early treatment, and killed any protocol that competed with his pharmaceutical enterprise. A lot of people have died [as a result].”

Although a bonanza of money was made with AZT, it pales in comparison to Pfizer making out like a bandit with its COVID shot. The U.S. taxpayers paid $20 billion to fund the research, and another $10 billion to market the COVID jab. Pfizer created the best-selling drug in the world and will make $35 billion from it this year.1 Even better, unlike AZT, this is absolutely risk-free and they can never be sued for injuries.

 

[Wingman68]

Of course it was used. Beginning in October 2013 participants were vaccinated with the CV7201 mRNA rabies vaccination. The study concluded on February 8, 2018 and results were published in October of that same year. The vaccine is

Of course it was used. Beginning in October 2013 participants were vaccinated with the CV7201 mRNA rabies vaccination. The study concluded on February 8, 2018 and results were published in October of that same year. The vaccine is patented under the name RNActive®.

What you mean is can I prove it to you. That's like trying to prove the earth is spherical to a flat earther.

You can reason that the covid pandemic and vaccine was a conspiracy planned decades ago and in 2013 some shadow organization faked a mRNA rabies vaccine using ModeRNA Technologies in preparation for the covid plot. But that is just conspiracy and a denial of actual facts.Because there was no need for a rabies vaccination. And this was done in Germany (the mRNA vaccine was produced by ModeRNA Technologies). It was not commercially released. The FDA operates within the US. The Pfizer covid vaccination is approved (not under emergency authorization).
Probably nobody.

I see the federal government overreaching in a couple of areas.

The federal government has no right to tell a business (not operating as a federal contract company) that they have to require vaccines or test for covid.

The federal government also has no right to allow unemployment for unvaccinated people who leave employment for not meeting conditions of employment in regards to vaccines. Unemployment belongs to the state.

But none of this deals with our constitutional freedoms.

Demanding business owners forfeit decisions regarding the vaccine and conditions of employment to "the people", on the other hand, is socialistic. It is taking away the freedoms of a man to operate his business within the boundaries of the law.


Cheers, Comrade.

It was used experimentally on 101 people. None over 40, & participants were excluded from the trial based on comorbidities etc. That’s about as favorable an outcome as you could dream up, & yet I cannot find any results of that trial. Maybe you can help, Jon. Fact is NO mrna jab has EVER been used in the market…..until now. So much for knowing any long term effects, but we are seeing some pretty devastating short term effects.

The trade name of your ‘evidence’ was patented. There are tons of patents that never materialize. The shot was NOT approved. The only two rabies shots currently approved are NOT Mrna. The covid vaxes being administered are NOT approved, they are all emergency use. They are experimental. Comirnaty is approved, but not available. It’s a bait & switch that keeps big pharma spinning without being responsible for the outcome.

I’m sorely tired of your name calling verbiage. Socialistic, Comrade, flat earther, & on & on. You sir, are a disgrace to the concept of this board.

 

[JonC]

It was used experimentally on 101 people. None over 40, & participants were excluded from the trial based on comorbidities etc. That’s about as favorable an outcome as you could dream up, & yet I cannot find any results of that trial. Maybe you can help, Jon. Fact is NO mrna jab has EVER been used in the market…..until now. So much for knowing any long term effects, but we are seeing some pretty devastating short term effects.

The trade name of your ‘evidence’ was patented. There are tons of patents that never materialize. The shot was NOT approved. The only two rabies shots currently approved are NOT Mrna. The covid vaxes being administered are NOT approved, they are all emergency use. They are experimental. Comirnaty is approved, but not available. It’s a bait & switch that keeps big pharma spinning without being responsible for the outcome.

I’m sorely tired of your name calling verbiage. Socialistic, Comrade, flat earther, & on & on. You sir, are a disgrace to the concept of this board.

It was used to develop mRNA vaccines (there was no commercial need for a rabies vaccination).

But you like to reference mRNA vacvines given to mice. Do you really believe scientists were interested in curing mouse diseases???

My question is why you like to reference mRNA vaccines given to mice but ignore mRNA vaccine given to people as "experimental".

Perhaps it is because you do not like the fact that the 2013 mRNA vaccine showed no long term side-effects and disproves your fears.

The point is the rabies vaccine study (Oct 2013 to Feb 2018) proved the viability and effectiveness of mRNA vaccines with booster shots.

You cry when people who died of coronavirus disease are counted if they had pre-existing conditions. You should be happy that the mRNA study for the effectiveness of mRNA vacvines excluded such categories.

Do you believe it was the Knights of Malta who came up with the rabies mRNA vaccine as well....or maybe the Freemasons?

I'll wait for an answer if you need to consult your dentist, psychotherapist or a sales clerk.