He has not been impeached. Technically, there is no impeachment until the final vote to send articles across takes place.Is Trump suppose to ignored the wrong doing if opposing it may help him in the future?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
He has not been impeached. Technically, there is no impeachment until the final vote to send articles across takes place.Is Trump suppose to ignored the wrong doing if opposing it may help him in the future?
5 voted not guilty on one count and 10 on the other.I think a Republican or two also voted "not guilty".
He has not been impeached.
The reason the "indefinite delay could case a problem" is because if they don't send articles to the Senate by the end of the session this year the whole process is "dead on the vine".
Could this be Nancy's ploy: "We knew the Partisan Republican-controlled Senate would whitewash Trump's evil so we choose not to send the Articles to the them. We Impeached Trump!!! and the Senate never exonerated him!!!"
Maybe Pelosi will get some new teeth in San Francisco and then do her job. She is evil.
5 voted not guilty on one count and 10 on the other.
the fact that Trump asked the president of Ukraine to investigate a political opponent is the issue.
yes he did use the Biden name later in the phone call :I don't think Trump used the name "Biden" in his phone call. It seemed like he talked about corruption "generally" and asked the Ukrainian President to deal with the well known political corruption in his country. I mean after all, we have the right to know that our taxpayer dollars aren't going down another rat hole.
T, I myself would not want to set foot in West Hollywood, a ...city...
Something is rotten in Denmark...that is, the proper channels have been acting corruptly.No. But please go thorough proper diplomatic channels. Don't call the guy up and record the conversation in the company of a bunch of other people.
... She still goes by "Waters, altho she & Mr. Waters were divorced in 1972, & she's Mrs. Sid Williams now.
I dont see a problem with that. Yes, leagally she is Mrs Williams.
But publically - its best to stay with one name
Look at Christian author Elizabeth Elliot - she was married three times - but
for public purposes - she retained the name of her first husband. It can be
confusing with different names. I was listening to an interview she had once
that her publisher insisted on her retaining her orgianl married name.
And the same goes true when she had a radio ministry.
BTW - her first husband was missionary Jim Elliot