Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
How does a president get rid of a senior? Assignation?Yeah, either Rosie has flipped or Trump is just waiting until after the midterms to get rid of him and maybe Jeff Flake. He's not going to make that yuge of a glaring mistake.
Yeah, either Rosie has flipped or Trump is just waiting until after the midterms to get rid of him
Possibly, but Baker’s testimony here regarding Rosenstein amounts to hearsay, maybe smear. They’ll need more than that.Lol, the plot thickens:
Comey Confidant James Baker Throws Rosenstein Under the Bus – Tells Congress His Plot to Oust Trump Was NOT A JOKE
"...Baker told Congress last week that his boss — then-Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe — was dead serious about the idea of surreptitiously recording the 45th president and using the evidence to make the case that Trump should be removed from office, according to my sources.
Baker told lawmakers he wasn’t in the meeting that McCabe had with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in which the subject came up. But he did have firsthand conversations with McCabe and the FBI lawyer assigned to McCabe, Lisa Page, about the issue.
“As far as Baker was concerned, this was a real plan being discussed,” said a source directly familiar with the congressional investigation. “It was no laughing matter for the FBI.”
Word of Baker’s testimony surfaces just days before Rosenstein is set to be interviewed in private on Thursday by House Judiciary Committee lawmakers.
“You walk away from the Baker interview with little doubt that the FBI leadership in that 2016-17 time-frame saw itself as far more than a neutral investigative agency but actually as a force to stop Trump’s election before it happened and then maybe reversing it after the election was over,” said a source directly familiar with the congressional investigation...."
Possibly, but Baker’s testimony here regarding Rosenstein amounts to hearsay, maybe smear. They’ll need more than that.
The New York Times are all Extreme Left-wing Liberal's!!
I like the New York Post better as they are conservative!!
I get most of my news from OAN News Network on YouTube!!
Here are some highlights of the essay. For the full piece, I suggest your local public library if you don't have access to a subscription.The 10/6 WSJ has an op-ed essay on this topic. I will write up the highlights later. As the article is behind a paywall by now.
--
NY Times expose of Trump Family financial information demonstrating how the myth of Donald Trump was created.
President Trump participated in dubious tax schemes during the 1990s, including instances of outright fraud, that greatly increased the fortune he received from his parents, an investigation by The New York Times has found.
Mr. Trump won the presidency proclaiming himself a self-made billionaire, and he has long insisted that his father, the legendary New York City builder Fred C. Trump, provided almost no financial help.
But The Times’s investigation, based on a vast trove of confidential tax returns and financial records, reveals that Mr. Trump received the equivalent today of at least $413 million from his father’s real estate empire, starting when he was a toddler and continuing to this day.
Much of this money came to Mr. Trump because he helped his parents dodge taxes. He and his siblings set up a sham corporation to disguise millions of dollars in gifts from their parents, records and interviews show. Records indicate that Mr. Trump helped his father take improper tax deductions worth millions more. He also helped formulate a strategy to undervalue his parents’ real estate holdings by hundreds of millions of dollars on tax returns, sharply reducing the tax bill when those properties were transferred to him and his siblings.
These maneuvers met with little resistance from the Internal Revenue Service, The Times found. The president’s parents, Fred and Mary Trump, transferred well over $1 billion in wealth to their children, which could have produced a tax bill of at least $550 million under the 55 percent tax rate then imposed on gifts and inheritances.
The Trumps paid a total of $52.2 million, or about 5 percent, tax records show.
The president declined repeated requests over several weeks to comment for this article. But a lawyer for Mr. Trump, Charles J. Harder, provided a written statement on Monday, one day after The Times sent a detailed description of its findings. “The New York Times’s allegations of fraud and tax evasion are 100 percent false, and highly defamatory,” Mr. Harder said. “There was no fraud or tax evasion by anyone. The facts upon which The Times bases its false allegations are extremely inaccurate.”
...
The findings are based on interviews with Fred Trump’s former employees and advisers and more than 100,000 pages of documents describing the inner workings and immense profitability of his empire. They include documents culled from public sources — mortgages and deeds, probate records, financial disclosure reports, regulatory records and civil court files.
The investigation also draws on tens of thousands of pages of confidential records — bank statements, financial audits, accounting ledgers, cash disbursement reports, invoices and canceled checks. Most notably, the documents include more than 200 tax returns from Fred Trump, his companies and various Trump partnerships and trusts. While the records do not include the president’s personal tax returns and reveal little about his recent business dealings at home and abroad, dozens of corporate, partnership and trust tax returns offer the first public accounting of the income he received for decades from various family enterprises.
--
It's a lengthy piece, but well worth your time.
NY Times expose of Trump Family financial information demonstrating how the myth of Donald Trump was created.
Mitch, did you read through the highlights I posted?
I have now, did you notice the ridiculous characterizations of what the Trumps did as well as the statements full of innuendo?
The TimesBy the Times or the WSJ?
The Times
So, essentially, the Wall Street Journal confirms the main thrust of the NY Times story:
- The headline:
- Dogs Bite Men and Trumps Duck Taxes
Nobody hands over 55% of his life’s work to the IRS. The real revelation is dad’s role in the Trump myth- SNIP the most interesting revelation is one the Times buries—the astonishing degree to which father Fred Trump patiently financed and strategically connived in the creation of what the paper calls the “Donald Trump myth.” Think Joseph P. Kennedy.
- The Times now finds illegal many Trump Senior dodges that in the 1990s passed IRS muster or escaped IRS notice and have been effectively rendered legal (at least for criminal purposes) by the statute of limitations
So, essentially, the Wall Street Journal confirms the main thrust of the NY Times story:
(1) Fred Trump, Sr., helped create the myth of the self-made financial genius Donald Trump.
(2) Donald Trump has used that myth as his prime credential for the Presidency.
(3) The statute of limitations has passed for criminal charges, but the IRS and the State of New York could pursue civil penalties.
cranial trephining ...What information would change your mind? Specifically, what will it take?
Tell that to Al CaponeHere's a section that jumped out to me:
The line between legal tax avoidance and illegal tax evasion is often murky, and it is constantly being stretched by inventive tax lawyers. There is no shortage of clever tax avoidance tricks that have been blessed by either the courts or the I.R.S. itself. The richest Americans almost never pay anything close to full freight.
Gee, that's not biased, no sirree. That's good factual journalism, that there.
Tell that to Al Capone