Oath of Enlistment

What real chance did he have other than in your conscience?

Does not give you an excuse to bash.

I am guilty, again, of taking over the purpose of this thread.

 

I vote for who I want to be president, not who I think can win.

Even if I was concerned about voting for a winner, Arkansas was in the bag for Trump so voting for either major party candidate would have had no effect on Arkansas' electoral votes.

 

That gives you an excuse to bash?

 

Please explain how voting for one candidate has anything to do with commenting on politics in general.

 

No thanks. Running for Congress once was quite sufficient.

 

For this we can all be thankful!!!

 

We don’t know ... we do know he asked his second wife to abort Tiffany.

 

You would like God to remember your past sins before "conversion"?
Not me.

 

You and me both, brother. You and me both.

 

Air Force Space Command definition of a domestic enemy of the Constitution (2013):

Identifying the domestic enemy > Air Force Space Command > Display

 

That sounds dangerously way off. He jumped from attacks against the US Constitution to revolting against a civil authority or established government to breaking a law. With all due respect, that’s absolutely revolting coming from an Air Force Colonel.

 

The Founders did allow and provide for a revolt and overthrow of a tyranny!

 

Some of these want to turn the tables so that anyone who disobeys a government edict is a domestic enemy.

 

Tom Dwyer

Tom's Tidbits- What, precisely, is a "Domestic Enemy"?

Joseph Schmitz

An inconvenient fact — Our constitution has 'domestic enemies' - Center for Security Policy

 

In his June 2, 2020, article in The Atlantic, former Chairman of the Joint Staff Admiral Mike Mullen wrote, “Our fellow citizens are not the enemy, and must never become so.”​

The admiral’s statement comes dangerously close to outing him as a domestic enemy, or perhaps puts him in the category. By definition, foreigners here legally or illegally cannot be domestic enemies, only foreign. The only domestic enemies would be fellow citizens whose allegiance is not to the US as demonstrated by action.

By taking a stance that rules out the very ones who could be domestic enemies, the admiral is in effect denying his oath to defend the Constitution against domestic enemies. At the very least, anyone doing that should be forced out of the military, out of government.

 

Not to worry. There are plenty of folks pushing back on the efforts by Donald Trump and his followers to destroy our representative constitutional republic form of government. I think the the SCOTUS will put an end by the close of today, or at least by Monday when the Electoral College votes, to their efforts through the court system to do so.