• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Obama inviting 'invasion of murderers, gang members

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You are so correct sir!

The media has this nasty little habit of spinning the news to take the truth out of anything that might make its viewers go ballistic.

HOWEVER, when the news calls these illegals children, what they are not telling us it that these children are in the teens, probably already part of a gang in their native land, and will only be used as new recruits for American gangs.

They may even be the first wave of an army of terrorists, sent to do recon and prepare for a major offensive in the borders of this nation!

On more reason to return them immediately!
 
Maybe you don't, but the WingNut Daily does. :thumbs:
Your overconfidence belies your willful ignorance.

CBS Houston Bureau: Texas Attorney General: Immigrants Crossing Border Illegally Are Raping, Killing In Texashttp://houston.cbslocal.com/2014/07...border-illegally-are-raping-killing-in-texas/http://houston.cbslocal.com/2014/07...border-illegally-are-raping-killing-in-texas/

AUSTIN (CBS Houston/AP) — Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott says up to 1,000 National Guard troops will be deployed to the U.S.-Mexico border to stop the immigrants who are crossing the border illegally for criminal purposes.

“The purpose of adding more resources on the ground is not to address the women and children, it’s to address the growing reality that a lot of people coming across the border are here for criminal purposes,” Abbott, the GOP gubernatorial hopeful, told Fox News on Monday. “They’re killing, they’re raping, they’re robbing, they’re doing all kinds of harsh criminal activity.”

Abbott said that women and children have been sexually assaulted by people who have come across the border.
Deal with it, M/P. Your president has encouraged the infiltration of criminals, gang members and drug addicts into the U.S. by letting everyone in Central and South America know that "feet dry" means they won't be deported.
 
So, where does it say that criminals from south of the border are being "invited" in by our President?
Did you not read this part?
Your president has encouraged the infiltration of criminals, gang members and drug addicts into the U.S. by letting everyone in Central and South America know that "feet dry" means they won't be deported.
Do you deny he has made it clear that immigration laws would be selectively enforced, that as a result of his clear-cut announcements over the last two years, traffic at the border has increased? You can't. You will, but you can't.
Reall correct.....so what do we do about it?:BangHead:
For starters, I'm not voting for any incumbents in the primary. Even if they get the win, maybe they'll get the message. I also believe it's important for us to contact our elected officials repeatedly and often, informing them that we are not pleased with how they are handling the nation and this loose-cannon president who seems to think he is King Barack I instead of the 44th president of a democratic republic. And if they don't listen, then I'm open to other options. Even extreme other options.

The Second Amendment M/P wants to negate was put in place for the precise eventualities we are seeing develop today as Thomas Jefferson saw 238 years ago:
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
And to paraphrase his next line: Such has been the patient suffering of this American people.
 
Do you happen to own a "Jump to Conclusions Mat"? I believe in the Second Amendment. So sir, you are obviously mistaken.
A. You are an Obama supporter.

B. Obama wants to blunt or negate the Second Amendment.

C. You support indirectly the blunting or negation of the Second Amendment.

The shoe fits. Wear it. Or stop endorsing, supporting and defending the president.
 

Magnetic Poles

New Member
A. You are an Obama supporter.

B. Obama wants to blunt or negate the Second Amendment.

C. You support indirectly the blunting or negation of the Second Amendment.

The shoe fits. Wear it. Or stop endorsing, supporting and defending the president.

You make another error in logic. Yes, I voted for the President because I believe he was the best of the two candidates that had an actual chance to win. I do support some of his agenda, but not all of it. Do you agree with every stance taken by every candidate you support? It is highly unlikely that any two people agree on everything. And again, give me evidence of where the President wants to negate the Second Amendment.
 
You make another error in logic. Yes, I voted for the President because I believe he was the best of the two candidates that had an actual chance to win. I do support some of his agenda, but not all of it. Do you agree with every stance taken by every candidate you support? It is highly unlikely that any two people agree on everything. And again, give me evidence of where the President wants to negate the Second Amendment.
See the other thread on which we've been trading jibes. :thumbsup:
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Good for you MP,

You make another error in logic. Yes, I voted for the President because I believe he was the best of the two candidates that had an actual chance to win. I do support some of his agenda, but not all of it. Do you agree with every stance taken by every candidate you support? It is highly unlikely that any two people agree on everything. And again, give me evidence of where the President wants to negate the Second Amendment.

You made the choice between two candidates and exercised your right to vote. Of course, I don't know whether to applaud you for exercising your rights as a citizen, or blaming you for the poor quality of a man you helped to put in office?

Still, you made your choice, and that choice helped to put Obama into the WH for two terms.

Let me ask this of you, and I can only hope you are straight with me and give an honest answer. Di you honestly believe you are getting your moneys worth from this guy you helped to put in office? Did you vote to have a man go off and golf or raise funds, while he decides to exercise presidential powers by circumventing Congress and doing his own thing?

Do you feel your man in the WH is doing a good job at the helm, considering the IRS scandal? failure of the VA? The many problems [that are still ongoing] surround Obamacare? The way he allowed four men to die in the Benghazi Embassey? How he is handling Putin's revived energy to take back the old mother Russia? All the hope and change he's brought to the poor by handing out everything from free phones to text on, to no jobs capable of supporting families? Back stabbing Israel? Releasing five terrorists for one AWOL, enemy collaborating deserter? Not lifting a finger to get a marine out of a Mexican prison? Allowing thousands and thousands of young people t flood our borders, while he prepares to circumvent the Congress and American people by signing an executive order making these border jumpers legal citizens?

Is this what you imagined when you listened to his oratory skills, spinning a bunch of lies about hope and change? I'm sure there are other lists.

So, what is your choice's greatest achievement while we watch America slide down that slippery hope? I'd like to know what you were thinking back then verses today, now that reality has begun to sink in? :BangHead::BangHead:
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Obama is a criminal. It is my fondest hope that he will someday pay for his crimes.

You are wasting your time, rd2. MP has never been critical of anything Obama has done.
He has defended every move he makes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I know .....

Obama is a criminal. It is my fondest hope that he will someday pay for his crimes.

You are wasting your time, rd2. MP has never been critical of anything Obama has done.
He has defended every move he makes.

.... but it isn't time to shake te sand off my sandals yet! :smilewinkgrin:
 
Top