Thinkingstuff
Active Member
Still DHK am I right in my assessment of your reasoning?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Thinkingstuff said:Still DHK am I right in my assessment of your reasoning?
No, I am not suggesting that at all. In fact I was not even suggesting that Catholicism was associated with the origins of Christmas as some misunderstood me to be saying. I was only pointing out how the English word "Christmas" is Catholic in nature, not Christian in nature, not that it has its roots in any certain paganism. The English language is a Germanic language and compared to most others is of relatively recent origin.So are you suggesting that (I guessing this is your reasoning) since Catholicism are basically a pagan religion that is comprable to what was shown on Zeitgeist and that Christ Mass is a celebration of a pagan ritual deity like Mythra that we must not celebrate the holiday at all? Is this correct?
"A Christmas tree has nothing to do with the birth of Christ."
'The only thing that you (as in you people) are defending is sentimentality, and that is all. You are emotionally attached to a tree, and don't want to give it up."
"There is nothing Biblical about it."
"It has pagan roots."
It has nothing to do with the birth of Christ."
"If you want to celebrate the birth of Christ why not "come out from among them and be ye separate," as the Lord says,..."
"...and do away with what the world does? Is it necessary to follow the "customs of the heathen?"
DHK said:No, I am not suggesting that at all. In fact I was not even suggesting that Catholicism was associated with the origins of Christmas as some misunderstood me to be saying. I was only pointing out how the English word "Christmas" is Catholic in nature, not Christian in nature, not that it has its roots in any certain paganism. The English language is a Germanic language and compared to most others is of relatively recent origin.
annsni said:Who here uses the days of the week's names?
Who here wears a wedding ring?
Who here was or married a bride wearing white and a veil?
Well, you've done something based in paganism. Did you do it knowing it was pagan? Did you do it to follow the pagan practices? Or did you do it based on tradition and preference?
Jeepers people! God does not tell us to not use a tree in our celebrations. He doesn't tell us to not to celebrate His birth. Let's get over the ridiculous arguments and use this season to minister to others and bring them to the Lord. Let's also use it as a time to draw families closer together (is that a bad thing?).
If God Himself told us to not get into vain arguments and not to judge each other on the special days we hold, then why are we??
FriendofSpurgeon said:Way too much common sense here. Please make sure that you edit this out and get back into the spirit of useless & needless arguments over nothing.
If you want a forum where you can confine your comments strictly to evangelism then please restrict yourself to the missions/evangelism forum created for that purpose, and don't post here. There are those of us who happen to be interested in the discussion of other topics as well.sag38 said:People are dying and going to hell but some are more worried about an evil pagan Christmas tree. Please....someone needs to loosen his shoes. They are tied way too tight. Loosen them up and refocus on what's important.
Do you actually believe that the "church" per se, that is God's own people, his churches, His people, those that He calls by His name, were extinguished in certain periods of history. For shame!FriendofSpurgeon said:Christ Mass is "not Christian in nature"???? What other Christian church was there when this term was developed??
I have pointed these out already in a previous post already. The names of the week are simply names of secular days having no religious significance whatsoever. We don't worship the sun on Sunday or Thor on Thursday. We don't even think of it. They are secular not religious. But Christmas is religious--to everyone--even the atheist, as has already been pointed out. Therefore, why not worship Christ in a Biblical way, not in a worldly way. Why copy the ways of the world, do what the world does, follow the traditions of the world. There is nothing that is Christian about a tree and all the decorations that go with it. They are the ways of the world.annsni said:Who here uses the days of the week's names?
Who here wears a wedding ring?
Who here was or married a bride wearing white and a veil?
Well, you've done something based in paganism. Did you do it knowing it was pagan? Did you do it to follow the pagan practices? Or did you do it based on tradition and preference?
He tells us to be different from the world; not to copy it. Instead Christians have such an emotional attachment to it, that they can't leave the worldJeepers people! God does not tell us to not use a tree in our celebrations.
I am not against the day; I am against the worldliness in which the day is celebrated.If God Himself told us to not get into vain arguments and not to judge each other on the special days we hold, then why are we??
DHK said:I have pointed these out already in a previous post already. The names of the week are simply names of secular days having no religious significance whatsoever. We don't worship the sun on Sunday or Thor on Thursday. We don't even think of it. They are secular not religious. But Christmas is religious--to everyone--even the atheist, as has already been pointed out. Therefore, why not worship Christ in a Biblical way, not in a worldly way. Why copy the ways of the world, do what the world does, follow the traditions of the world. There is nothing that is Christian about a tree and all the decorations that go with it. They are the ways of the world.
James 4:4 Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.
God doesn't take kindly to those that are "friends to this ungodly world."
He tells us to be different from the world; not to copy it. Instead Christians have such an emotional attachment to it, that they can't leave the world
NO, He tells you to come out from the world and be separate. Again he says:
1 John 2:15-16 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.
--It is not of the Father; it is of the world. You need to get that straight.
He doesn't tell us to not to celebrate His birth. Let's get over the ridiculous arguments and use this season to minister to others and bring them to the Lord. Let's also use it as a time to draw families closer together (is that a bad thing?).
I am not against the day; I am against the worldliness in which the day is celebrated.
Baal worship had pagan roots a thousand years or more also. Do you also want to imitate that? Again, Demonstrate what relationship does a Christmas tree has to the birth of Christ other than your emotional attachment to it, and your imitation of the ways of the world?Alive in Christ said:DHK,
We all know that. Why cant you see that it also has nothing to with any kind of false pagan worship? Maybe it did a thousand years ago, I dont know...but it sure doesnt now.
A step in the right direction.Actually, as I mentioned in an earlier post, I havent had a christmas tree for several years.
There is nothing Biblical having a tree associated with the birth of Christ. Demonstrate it from the Bible. You offer no proof. It is pure worldliness--the ways of the world which God hates, and of which God says: whosoever is a friend of the world is the enemy of God. Whose side are you on?And there is nothing biblical against it.
So you don't worship it; so what? You imitate the pagans that do. That is called worldliness. That is what James calls being a friend of the world; what John calls "is not of the Father." It is therefore wrong.So what? We arent pagans and we dont worship it.
Here is the emotion coming out in your statements--it is pretty, colorful, etc. So what! Those are the attractions of the world. That is how the Serpent allured Eve to take of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Sentimentality is not Biblical proof.We know that. We dont pretend that it does. Its simply PRETTY. Its colorful, they look pretty, and they brighten up the room during the cold wintertime.
Separation (and sanctification) is not a one-time event. It is an on-going process.I did that. 26 years ago when I was born again.
Every mall has a Christmas tree; every shopping center. They are there to attract the unsaved to appeal to their emotions at this time of year. It is the way of the heathen, not the way of the saved who pretend to be celebrating the birth of Christ. If that is the way you are celebrating Christ, IMO you are a hypocrite. For I repeat again, James declares that that method of celebrating such a sacred event is simply being "an enemy of God--a friend of the world.We arent following the customs of the heathen. We are taking advantage of the opportunity to be thankful for Christs coming into the world.
Read your statement carefully.We feel that way all through the rest of the year of course, but we just like to make big deal out of it during this time.
Sure I do. So does the worship of Allah, aggravate atheists. So what! But most Muslims and Jews don't mind the celebration of Christmas.Did you know that it irritates a lot of athiests, pagans, and non-christians that we do it?
Atheists and the ACLU in general are upset about the celebration of any religion, not just Christianity. The religion of humanism taught in our public (secular) school system saw to that.If we were "doing as the pagan world does", as you suggest, then why would they be upset about it?
1 John 2:15-16 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.annsni said:If we are to be different from the world as you are saying, then we need to do a lot more than trash our tree at Christmas time. We should not drive cars since the world does that. So how do we travel? Walk? Well, the world does that. Ride horses? Worldly. Ride bikes? Worldly.
Your emotion blinds you to the scripture.I do not see one bit of Scripture to support getting rid of any of our traditions at Christmas. To say that we are to do things differently than the world either carries over to every part of our lives or it doesn't mean a thing. We worship the Lord in a church building, with a PA system, with a band or with an organ - or even with just voices (the pagans LOVE to use just their voices). We sit in chairs, we shake hands - EVERYTHING we do is similar to the world. Do you think if we trash our tree that we increase our testimony to the Lord to the world? Do you think that if we trash our tree, we are better followers of Christ?
I never said you worshiped a tree. I said you followed the ways of the world. And you do. Find out what those verses mean and stop being so defensive and emotional. Be a bit more objective.A Christmas tree is not pagan in origin. It is from Old Germany and was decorated for Christmas. I do not worship Satan with my tree. I do all to the glory of God. Just as I decorate my home with homey things, I decorate my home with a Christmas tree. It is just a tradition. Nothing more. We also have a tradition of eating a casserole on Christmas morning - that is worldly I'm sure. But I'm still going to do it because it is our tradition and building roots for my family are important - not because the world does it.
I am not forcing you to respond.I think people have way too much to argue about when they want to argue about a large piece of plastic in my living room.
"I never said you worshiped a tree. I said you followed the ways of the world. And you do. Find out what those verses mean and stop being so defensive and emotional. Be a bit more objective."
DHK said:Do you actually believe that the "church" per se, that is God's own people, his churches, His people, those that He calls by His name, were extinguished in certain periods of history. For shame!
There has never been a period of history where God has not left himself without a witness--never! The Catholic Church and all of her godless inventions has always been protested against ever since her invention in the time of Constantine--always.
It is not Trail of Blood, which I have admitted; there are mistakes in it.FriendofSpurgeon said:Oh, Trail of Blood... never mind...
DHK said:1 John 2:15-16 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.
Do you have any idea of the meaning of that verse. Please explain it to me. Apparently you are naive to the meaning of what it means to be "a worldly Christian."
As to the origin of "Christmas" in general, and all of its various traditions, you also seem to be unknowledgeable. All I can say is, that you search it out for yourself. I am not going to take the time here.
Your emotion blinds you to the scripture.
What does it mean when the Bible says: "Whosoever is a friend to the world is the enemy of God."
Please explain.
I never said you worshiped a tree. I said you followed the ways of the world. And you do. Find out what those verses mean and stop being so defensive and emotional. Be a bit more objective.
I am not forcing you to respond.