lets_reason_toghether
New Member
What is the difference between an "old line regualar baptist" and a "primitive baptist"
thanks
thanks
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That's exactly how I feel about the United Baptists. There's slight variance by region more so than by articles of faith or doctrine.What little difference between the different churches is based on location more than doctrine.
Zane, this is a very astute observation on the commonalities of these Baptist "sub-groups", which are often overlooked because of their differences.Originally posted by zane 446:
...I notice certain similarities among the histories of the Old Regular, Regular, United, Primitive, and Missionary Baptist churches (along with all the sub-categories in each tradition) in that they in one way or another represent a move away from "modernism" in the church and/or state/national "conventions" that usurp the independence of the local church or association.
I have two CD's of Old Regular Baptist songs. The first was made by members of the Indian Bottom Association and produced by Smithsonian Folkways Recordings. I am not sure who made and produced the second album. Listening to them brings back wonderful memories of when I was a child/teenager. I don't believe that either were recorded during a church service.Originally posted by Bethelassoc:
I have another question for the ORBs:
What is the consensus of having a service taped for listening purposes? If a person is wanting the tunes to some lined out songs and would like to know if they could tape some service to have those songs preserved?
Is this frowned upon?
David