Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
No, that's not "in other words".Originally posted by Helen:
In other words, Christ's shed blood PAYING for us meant nothing.
So if one can get divorced, that means that the entire meaning of marriage is cancelled out?We can bounce back and forth between saved and unsaved -- which, in effect, cancels the entire meaning of saved!
Yes. But it's possible nonetheless.Originally posted by Helen:
Divorce is not part of God's economy. He hates it, remember?
And yet the branch can still be cut off, and the forgiven servant can have his forgiveness revoked.Jesus will not sell me off to another. I am His. I will be disciplined and I may kick and scream, spiritually, sometimes because I don't like it, but nevertheless, I am His, bought and paid for. And HE is taking responsibility for me (Romans 8, Phil. 1:6). I am not my own that quit on this path that I have started with Him. I am a changed person. It is not just a changed position, but my old self DIED. It will not be resurrected that I should be able to return to it and kill my new self!
Scripture says otherwise, Luke 8:13.As far as no longer believing, that is impossible!
That's a bit absurd. People change beliefs all the time, on all sorts of subjects.Once you know something is true, that's that. I could just as easily say I don't believe I am breathing air. It would be nonsensical and I, and everyone else, would know that I knew better!
Who ever said anything about bouncing back and forth, we are talking about rejection of Gods gift. Having the freedom of choice to walk away because you just don't want to do it anymore. It's about not wanting to do it anymore. To stop funning for the prize,to become unsalty, to nullify all that God has done for you and reject His promises and to just plain and simply say I can't do it anymore.Originally posted by Helen:
In other words, Christ's shed blood PAYING for us meant nothing. We can bounce back and forth between saved and unsaved -- which, in effect, cancels the entire meaning of saved!
Thank you, Bro. Ed Edwards! That is the clearest interpretation of that passage I have ever heard! I've always heard that passage quoted as a proof text AGAINST once saved always saved. In fact, a previous pastor of mine who believes in OSAS, became "confused" about that particular passage in Hebrews.Originally posted by Ed Edwards:
Hebrews 6:3-6 is the kingpin of the Security Salvation Doctrine...The type logic used here is called Proof by Contridiction.
The assumption made in Hebrews 6:4-6. (words are used from the KJV1769)
Assume that there is one who was once
enlightened, who had tasted of the heavenly gift, who was made a partaker of the Holy Ghost, who had tasted the good word of God, and who had tasted the powers of the world to come.
Assume they fall away.
Then it would be necessary to renew themselves again unto repentance.
Then it would be necessary to crucify for themselves only the Son of God afresh.
Then that would put Christ to open shame again.
This is contradictory and makes no sense. Christ will not be put to open shame. Christ will not be cruified anew for one person's sin.
The person cannot renew themselves again unto repentance.
QED:
Hebrews 6:4-6 (KJV1769 Edition):
It is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavnly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,
5. And have tested the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,
6. If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance, seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.
This is the true doctrine of the Security of the Believer straight from the Bible. Note that this Doctrine does not disagree with John 3:16 'that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life
Originally posted by Ed Edwards:
Did you ever read a 'plan of unsalvation'?
I like to look at the word pictures in the Bible of salvation.
Just 'salvation', yep maybe you can use it.
But one picture of salvation is 'born again'.
How do you get un-born-again?
One picture of salvation is being adopted into the family of God.
How do you get un-adopted?
One picture of salvation is being born into the family of God.
how to you get un-'born into the family of God'.
One picture of salvation is putting on white robes of righteousness.
Does God run a strip joint?![]()
One picture of salvation is joining the bride of Christ.
How do you un-marry Christ?
One picture of salvation is being 'sealed with the Holy Spirit'.
How do you get un-sealed?
Yep, there is no 'plan of un-salvation'.
Not really. It isn't talking about Paul losing his salvation. If Paul was hypocritical and did not practice what he preached he would be worthless for what he was called to do.Originally posted by Robert J Hutton:
I wonder if 1st Cor 9 v 27 sheds any light on this issue.
In the parable it says the seed "immediatley took root" which means roots can grow in bad soil and you cannot grow period unless God is in the seed. Like Paul said " I sow the seed Barnabas waters and only God makes it grow." So if it grew at all it was because of God. And with out having the Holy Spirit it is impossible to grow at all even in good soil. So these three had the Holy Spirit since we knew at some point they flourished where they were at. But the cares of the world took over and they viewed God as less important or they did not hold on to their faith.Originally posted by Roguelet:
Roots cannot grow on the conditions of the first three sowers soil. Only the last soil could produce any real fruit. How you can get something other than that out of the parable is beyond me !
If that were true, then the type of belief and not the duration of the belief would be the issue in the verse. As it stands, the duration is the issue.Originally posted by Roguelet:
The first three sowers in the story had a head knowledge and a emotional experense.
No he didn't. The first had the word taken away, lest they believe and are saved. The second did not have the word taken away, and believed, but only for a while. The third grow, but "becometh unfruitful" because of being choked by thorns.Jesus said it was the fourth that was actually really saved while the others were not.
The root is not the issue. The issue is the fruit produced. The axe is at the root of the tree that doesn't produce fruit.Roots cannot grow on the conditions of the first three sowers soil. Only the last soil could produce any real fruit.
Not really. It isn't talking about Paul losing his salvation. If Paul was hypocritical and did not practice what he preached he would be worthless for what he was called to do.Originally posted by Artimaeus:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Robert J Hutton:
I wonder if 1st Cor 9 v 27 sheds any light on this issue.
Again, that word "believeth" is there - and in the ongoing, continous form in the Greek.A better verse which is directly talking about salvation is:
Joh 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
I am married, and become "one flesh" with my wife. Yet divorce exists.I believe (I entrust my spiritual well being to Christ), I HAVE (right now possess), everlasting (perpetual - doesn't end), life.
Actually, scripture does talk about double jeopardy, about the king completely forgiving a servant, and then later revoking that forgiveness and casting him into prison.The trial is over. The judge has pardoned me, given me diplomatic immunity by giving me citizenship in heaven, and there is no double jeopardy.