For the record, Alans claim was that there is only one baptism in Scripture, therefore, he reasoned, that everywhere in Scripture that uses the word baptism must be speaking of water baptism
Nope. There is "one baptism" that as in any other word read under the influence of one of the most fundamental tools of Hermeneutics, "if the plain sense of a word makes sense, then we accept it as expressing that initial plain common sense every time", unless the context dictates otherwise, rather than immediately resorting to making wild guesses as to any other possibility in the world that it might mean, strictly as the product of our imagination, for no reason other than we like the sound of it and so we also give ourselves permission to take over the place of God and to rewrite His Bible.
With 'immersion' being the meaning of 'baptism' and that 'baptism' having been established in the New Testament with respect the the Lord's churches He Founded, as being 'immersed' in "much water", as in the river Jordan that where John the Baptist brought Jesus "up straightway out of the water", in Matthew 3:16a; "And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water:...", we are safe to understand 'baptism' as having it's plain common sense meaning of 'water baptism'.
Water baptism as Ordained for the Ordinance in the Lord's churches which was Originated by the Authority of God is extremely important to the Triune Godhead.
After, all Three of Them witnessed the 'water baptism' of Jesus, 'baptism' as the first act of obedience commanded of new believers, was subsequently Administered for entrance into the membership of one of the Lord's kind of churches He Built, in the Name of all Three Divine Persons in the Godhead.
However, man has all but done away with what the word 'church', or 'body', always means when referring to a 'church' and have replaced the kind of 'church' Jesus said He was Building, with a newly invented definition for 'church' which defines some entity that is just the exact, perfectly opposite, of what the word 'church' always refers to in the Bible, as being an 'organized local, called out, assembly of particular saved individuals', to try to have an 'organized local, called out assembly of particular saved individuals', as a 'congregation', said to be referring to an "entirely unorganized, worldwide, scattering of all saved individuals', or a 'kingdom'.
Then, having eliminated Jesus' Preeminence in Divinely Originating what He said He was Divinely Originating, the next target for devouring on Satan's itinerary was to annihilate Jesus' Divinely Originated church Ordinance of 'water baptism', God had Established.
It's a good thing Jesus Promised that "the gates of Hell" would not prevail against His kind of churches He Built, along with it's Divine Ordinance of water baptism by the Authority of God, for entrance into one, isn't it?
History is drenched with them. From Jesus' Day, until today, and until Jesus Returns again, just like He Promised.
But, false religion has no use for ether a 'church' like Jesus Built, or His Divine Ordinance of baptism, so you know what they do, after twisting the words in the Bible into Pretzel Logic and rewriting it's words and their meanings like it's a coloring book?
They tell you that they are both invisible, now, after they have been bastardized into something they never were and aren't now, but that THEIR NEWLY INVENTED MAN-MADE 'INVISIBLE CHURCH' AND 'INVISIBLE BAPTISM' ARE ALSO THE ONLY TRUE, REALLY REAL, REALITIES THAT GOD CHANGED THEM TO.
DESPITE THE FACT THAT THEY HAVE NO BIBLE FOR ETHER ONE.
Different, huh?
Yeah, Demonic, from the word go.
Simply, manifest Christian Apostasy in their departure from "the faith once given to the saints".
Not you guys.
Your forefathers decades ago, probably, if they ever had it.
It has had to be going on for a while now, because when I Googled these extra-Biblical, newfangled, playing church nonsense, they come back with nothing but lies.
It's too bad.
You'd think that all it takes is to just learn how to handle our own Mother Tounge, but Jesus told Peter the way it really is, in the Realm of Spiritual Warfare, didn't He.
Flesh and blood don't reveal the Spiritual things of God to Peter; God did.
May He open your eyes to follow the Lord's example, by being Scripturally Baptized into the membership of one of His church bodies, by the Authority of God, where you can serve and worship Him in Spirit and Truth.
. He said that the Spirit baptism was made up and wasn't in Scripture. I c
Amen.
1 Peter 3:21: For there to be a antitype (that saves), there must also be a type (that points). We all know that types point to spiritual truths, but have no power in and of themselves. The "type" in that passage by Peter is clearly water baptism, thus the definition " (not the removal of the filth of the flesh...". The rest of that sentence "..."but the answer of a good conscience toward God)" is faith. A baptism by faith is what saves us.
So, you just thought you'd throw in a second, entirely unpresidented and random wild guess, as a second kind of baptism into that verse out of nowhere, for no reason?
You can't do that, just like no one else is allowed to.
A baptism by faith is what saves us.
And you assume something like that to be true and repeat it over and over, but what if you didn't?
Start out by not assuming it and show where anything like that is ever taught.
I see there are several scriptures in a row, concerning the interpretation of which, you have no clue.
I might look at them, but understanding them correctly won't support your invisible friends, so unless you repent and give them up as being invisibly worthless anyway, you probably won't get any of it.