• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

One Gospel?

UZThD

New Member
Originally posted by Bro Tony:
I know of no credible teacher of dispensationalism who believes there is more than one Gospel.

Bro Tony [/QB]
===

I don't know how you define a "credible teacher," but Chas Baker who is a grad of Dallas Seminary and who is pres emeritus of Grace Bible College and who wrote "A Dispensational Theology" says in that book in chap 42 that Paul preached a different Gospel than did Jesus and the other apostles. Therefore, IMO, while friend IT. is quite wrong, he is not quite unique! ;)

[ August 01, 2005, 11:47 AM: Message edited by: UZThD ]
 

Bro Tony

New Member
UZThD,

Thank you for your post, I knew when I put that statement out there that someone would find a person who teaches such things as more than one Gospel in the dispies camp. That does not make it so, nor does it make it the norm or what dispies believe. I am always concerned with this broad brush approach at the labeling that takes place of people of different theological stands, especially when it comes to these matters. There are so many shades of types in every theological group when it comes to peoples understanding of end times that generalizations may be unavoidable. But when someone states that dispensationalist believe in more than one Gospel, that is a specific charge that is not true and leads to major misunderstandings.

Bro Tony
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by OldRegular:
This was posted on another thread but it seems to be appropriate on this one.

From reading all of ituttut's posts one would think that there were only 3 Apostles, Peter, John, and Paul. I would remind him that there were 9 additional Apostles and that some of these traveled as far as India preaching to Gentiles.

Please put a date on Apostles traveling to India.

It is certain that Paul did not establish the Church at Rome. Who did? Did it not include Gentiles? Paul's letter to the Church at Rome would certainly indicate that it did. It wasn't Peter or John who established the Church at Rome since they were in Jerusalem.

Does scripture tell you Paul didn’t establish the church in Rome? Can you show me? I can show you scripture that says he did. It could not have been any other gospel than Paul’s that started the Christian church in Rome. You either completely ignore what I keep pointing out to you, or you just plain will not believe Christ Jesus spoke to Paul from heaven, and gave this New Apostle the New gospel to the Gentile, and Peter says NOW the circumcised can be saved in the same manner as is the heathen.

There is also one significant passage of Scripture in Paul's letter to the Church at Rome that dispensationalists have apparently never read since they continuously insist that God revealed some deep mystery to Paul that none of His people had heard before,

Perhaps you have never talked to one that holds to the dispensational gospel of Paul before. You may have been talking to one that has the appearance of a dispensationalist.

I notice you have no idea of how, or who established the Christian church in Rome. I know, for the Bible tells us so. This will be a good study for you. I’m sure there must be others here that can prove Paul’s gospel established the Christian church in Rome. Search and you will find. There is other proof than this, but you know the Roman Empire extended into Judah, and Israel, and remember the missionary journeys of Paul.

Paul had many converts that returned to Rome, or made their first venture there. Two of these are named in Acts. Just think of how many more carried the gospel of Paul not only to Rome, but other places to the West.

Romans 1:1-7; 13; 16, 17
1. Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God,
2. (Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures,)
3. Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord
, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh;
4. And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:
5. By whom we have received grace and apostleship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his name:
6. Among whom are ye also the called of Jesus Christ:
7. To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.

13. Now I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes I purposed to come unto you, (but was let hitherto,) that I might have some fruit among you also, even as among other Gentiles.

Pretty telling I would say. As we read Romans we can know Paul had communicated previously with Roman believers. He evidently informed them that hopefully he planned to visit Rome. But a considerable time had passed, possibly several years. He doesn’t want them to be ignorant of this fact, but he had been hindered.

16. For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.
17. For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.


From verse 2 we see that the Gospel of God, or the Gospel of Jesus Christ if you prefer, [this mystery that had supposedly been revealed only to Paul?] had been promised by His prophets in the Holy Scriptures [the Old Testament]. Yet dispensationalists insist that the Old Testament knows nothing of the Gospel of Jesus Christ or the Church even though Paul himself states that the Gospel was preached to Abraham.

Your Old Testament reads differently than mine. Where is the name of Jesus Christ found in the Old Testament?

Also note that in verse 13 we see that there were indeed Gentiles in the Church at Rome and these Gentiles had not heard the preaching of the Gospel supposedly revealed only to Paul.

These saved are of Paul, as they are Christians, and this is only possible to be so by believing the gospel of Christ Jesus from heaven. They are there, and Paul wishes to also be there with them.

Finally in verse 16 the apostle Paul defines the Gospel of Jesus Christ as the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth.

Is this not that New gospel. I notice you don’t say that “believeth”, and now you must “repent and be baptized for the remission of your sins”.

Strangely in verse 17 the Apostle returns to the Old Testament to help define this Gospel stating The just shall live by faith. Habakkuk 2:4

Faith to faith, by to through. How else can we live that faith other than By faith in God that comes Through the faith of Jesus Christ, and through the blood of the Cross we come. We died on that Cross with our Lord Jesus Christ. That is why we are today considered “sinless” in the eyes of God. If we are in the Body of Christ we doubtless have been made righteous. Only the righteous can be in the Body of Christ. Yet in these sinful bodies (that’s the reason we are to die, is to get rid of the sin in these bodies) we sin for we are of this sinful world. But our spirit is spotless, and someday so will our New bodies becoming one with our New Spirit.

Dispensationalists such as ituttut tell us that the true Gospel was supposedly revealed only to Paul, meaning:

You know this is not what I teach. Please read your Bible and also what I have written to you. If you answer, please tell me what you believe Paul is saying to YOU. To whom did Christ Jesus reveal His heavenly to First? Ephesians 2:2-3, ”If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: 3. How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery.” After absorbing this, try verse 4, ”Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ).”

We must absorb as we move along. Verses 5-9, ”Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; 6. That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel: 7. Whereof I was made a minister, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of his power. 8. Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ; 9. And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:”

Can’t you see OldRegular, it is not me you are putting down, but the one Christ chose to spread His heavenly gospel to all in this hidden dispensation.

1. That all the other Apostles were preaching a false Gospel until Paul came along.
2. That Jesus Christ taught a false Gospel to his Apostles and followers.

You know I have never taught such a thing, for I believe Christ Jesus on earth, and I believe Him in heaven. You evidently have only gotten far enough to know the gospel of John the Baptist, and the “great commission”.

3. Since Paul apparently talked only to Peter and John how the remaining nine received the correct Gospel must remain a mystery.


Why do you not tell the truth of what I say, and imply?

The doctrine of these dispensationalists is seriously flawed and the implications of what these dispensationalists teach is very dangerous.
You do know you are talking about Christ Jesus, don’t you? Who gave the dispensational gospel to Paul? I would rethink before making statements such as this in the future. Some may think you are unaware that Christ Jesus is presently seated beside His Father in heaven, and this dispensation is the dispensation that Paul speaks from. Christian faith, ituttut Galatians 1:11-12.
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by Bro Tony:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Ituttut, I think you are mixed within what dispensationalism teaching.
I think this may be catching. I have heard so many distortions of what dispensationalism teaches on this thread. What Ituttut teaches is not dispensationalism but his own view of things. I know of no credible teacher of dispensationalism who believes there is more than one Gospel.

Bro Tony
</font>[/QUOTE]Hi Bro Tony. Please read the Epistles of Paul, who has the dispensational gospel for this dispensation. Paul says we are not to mix His gospel with that of the others. You will notice Peter says the Jew can now be saved as the Gentile just by believing on the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. If Peter says it is Now possible for them, it must have not been possible before. Christian faith, ituttut.
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by UZThD:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Bro Tony:
I know of no credible teacher of dispensationalism who believes there is more than one Gospel.

Bro Tony
===

I don't know how you define a "credible teacher," but Chas Baker who is a grad of Dallas Seminary and who is pres emeritus of Grace Bible College and who wrote "A Dispensational Theology" says in that book in chap 42 that Paul preached a different Gospel than did Jesus and the other apostles. Therefore, IMO, while friend IT. is quite wrong, he is not quite unique! ;) [/QB]</font>[/QUOTE]Amen, fellow in Christ. I am certainly not endeavoring to bring anything New to the Table, nor is Brother Baker, Sadler, Stam, Darby, or any of the others that hold to the gospel of Paul. We only preach and teach the dispensational gospel of Paul rightly divided.

We all don't agree with each other, just as all Baptists don't agree on every little item. Paul was still growing, as was Peter and the rest when they were taken, and so shall we. I have grown since becoming a Baptist at the age of 9, and I am still a Baptist, and I continue to grow.

Christian faith, ituttut Galatians 1:11-12
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by ituttut:
I notice you have no idea of how, or who established the Christian church in Rome. I know, for the Bible tells us so.
Please enlighten me and all others on this Forum!
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Actually some hyper-dispensationalists believe that only the prison Epistles of Paul apply to the churches. That is why they reject both water Baptism and the Lord's Supper though Paul endorsed both.????? Others accept that additional writings of Paul are appropriate for the churches and endorse the Lord's Supper but reject water Baptism???? [Ryrie, Dispensationalism, page 198ff]

How can anyone who rejects water Baptism be a Baptist?????
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by ituttut:
These saved are of Paul, as they are Christians, and this is only possible to be so by believing the gospel of Christ Jesus from heaven.
So you are stating that all those who were saved by the preaching of the remaining 11 Apostles were not Christians?

Wonder what God thinks about this?
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by OldRegular:
There is also one significant passage of Scripture in Paul's letter to the Church at Rome that dispensationalists have apparently never read since they continuously insist that God revealed some deep mystery to Paul that none of His people had heard before,

Romans 1:1-7
1. Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God,
2. (Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures,)
3. Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord
, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh;
4. And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:
5. By whom we have received grace and apostleship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his name:
6. Among whom are ye also the called of Jesus Christ:
7. To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.


From verse 2 we see that the Gospel of God, or the Gospel of Jesus Christ if you prefer, [this mystery that had supposedly been revealed only to Paul?] had been promised by His prophets in the Holy Scriptures [the Old Testament]. Yet dispensationalists insist that the Old Testament knows nothing of the Gospel of Jesus Christ or the Church even though Paul himself states that the Gospel was preached to Abraham.
Response posted by ituttut:
Your Old Testament reads differently than mine. Where is the name of Jesus Christ found in the Old Testament?
ituttut

Was Paul lying when he wrote verses 1&2? Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God, (Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures,) Are you saying that Jesus Christ was not God?
 

UZThD

New Member
Originally posted by Bro Tony:
[QB] UZThD,

Thank you for your post, I knew when I put that statement out there that someone would find a person who teaches such things as more than one Gospel in the dispies camp.

===

I could find in just my little library more than "a person" , eg: Stuart Allen, "The Kingdom of God in Heaven and on Earth" and CH Welch, "Dispensational Truth."

But you're right. Many Dispys would disagree with Baker, Allen, Welch, and, friend IT.
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by OldRegular:
Originally posted by OldRegular: Response posted by ituttut:
Your Old Testament reads differently than mine. Where is the name of Jesus Christ found in the Old Testament?
ituttut,
Was Paul lying when he wrote verses 1&2? Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God, (Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures,) Are you saying that Jesus Christ was not God?


Of course I’m not saying Jesus Christ is not God. But you need to read further for the gospel Paul refers to here is the gospel in prophecy.

You have to make the distinction of God the Father, and God the Son. You cannot be saved by believing on the Name of God, and be saved. We must believe God became man, and this man has a name, and it is Jesus Christ, and if we refuse that name, how can we be saved?

Skip down to verse 9 for the gospel of Paul. ”For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the gospel of his Son, that without ceasing I make mention of you always in my prayers. We see here and elsewhere the two gospels that were preached during the time of the Apostles.

”No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him,” John 1:18. Are you saying God the Father is the Only Begotten Son of the Father? God the Word became flesh, and His Name is Jesus Christ, and there is no other name under heaven whereby men can be saved.

In the Old Testament His people worshipped the One true God, which they considered the Father, and He made a two-way covenant with them, and them alone, and He was their God, and He says they will again be His very own. Today almost every human being says there is a God, and most of them worship a God, and most evidently believe that is all they need is call his name God, or some have other names you know of, but were you saved by any of those names, or by the only name that has saving power, and His name Is Jesus Christ, the Son of God? Christian faith, ituttut
 

UZThD

New Member
IMO monogenes is there (in the KJV, in John's 5 applications of that adjective to Christ) ) mistranslated , and IMO no divine Person begets the other divine Persons as each Person has all of God's attributes one of which is aseity.

UZ
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by ituttut:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by OldRegular:
Originally posted by OldRegular: Response posted by ituttut:
Your Old Testament reads differently than mine. Where is the name of Jesus Christ found in the Old Testament?
ituttut,
Was Paul lying when he wrote verses 1&2? Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God, (Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures,) Are you saying that Jesus Christ was not God?


Of course I’m not saying Jesus Christ is not God. But you need to read further for the gospel Paul refers to here is the gospel in prophecy.

You have to make the distinction of God the Father, and God the Son. You cannot be saved by believing on the Name of God, and be saved. We must believe God became man, and this man has a name, and it is Jesus Christ, and if we refuse that name, how can we be saved?

Skip down to verse 9 for the gospel of Paul. ”For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the gospel of his Son, that without ceasing I make mention of you always in my prayers. We see here and elsewhere the two gospels that were preached during the time of the Apostles.

”No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him,” John 1:18. Are you saying God the Father is the Only Begotten Son of the Father? God the Word became flesh, and His Name is Jesus Christ, and there is no other name under heaven whereby men can be saved.

In the Old Testament His people worshipped the One true God, which they considered the Father, and He made a two-way covenant with them, and them alone, and He was their God, and He says they will again be His very own. Today almost every human being says there is a God, and most of them worship a God, and most evidently believe that is all they need is call his name God, or some have other names you know of, but were you saved by any of those names, or by the only name that has saving power, and His name Is Jesus Christ, the Son of God? Christian faith, ituttut
</font>
In Romans 1:1 the Apostle Paul states that he was separated unto the gospel of God, (Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures,) You quote verse 9 which states For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the gospel of his Son,. You then state
We see here and elsewhere the two gospels that were preached during the time of the Apostles.
Since Paul states that he was separated unto the gospel of God, and also that he served serve with his spirit in the gospel of his Son.

1. Are you stating that Paul preached two Gospels? Strange given that he states in Galatians that such are accursed.

2. Are you saying that the Gospel of God is different than the Gospel of God the Son? Again strange since Paul would then be committed to two Gospels [verses 1 and 9 above]. Also strange since Scripture states that God is not the author of confusion.

ituttut there is but one Gospel, there has always been only one Gospel, there will always be only one Gospel. That Gospel was taught by Jesus Christ, preached by all the Apostles including Paul, was preached to Abraham and is the power of God unto Salvation. To assert otherwise is heretical!
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by ituttut:
”No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him,” John 1:18. Are you saying God the Father is the Only Begotten Son of the Father? God the Word became flesh, and His Name is Jesus Christ, and there is no other name under heaven whereby men can be saved.
ituttut

Do you have the foggiest idea what you are talking about??????
:D I sure don't??????? :D :D :D
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by OldRegular:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by ituttut:
I notice you have no idea of how, or who established the Christian church in Rome. I know, for the Bible tells us so.
Please enlighten me and all others on this Forum! </font>[/QUOTE]ituttut

How long do we have to wait?
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by OldRegular:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by ituttut:
I notice you have no idea of how, or who established the Christian church in Rome. I know, for the Bible tells us so.
Please enlighten me and all others on this Forum! </font>[/QUOTE]Paul tells in the book of Romans, that it is His gospel that established the Christian church in Rome. Let’s start with Acts 18:2-4, ”And found a certain Jew named Aquila, born in Pontus, lately come from Italy, with his wife Priscilla; (because that Claudius had commanded all Jews to depart from Rome:) and came unto them. 3. And because he was of the same craft, he abode with them, and wrought: for by their occupation they were tentmakers. 4. And he reasoned in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks”. Aquila and Priscilla became Christians, not in Rome, but after their encounter with Paul.

When Paul wrote Romans, many had been converted to the “grace commission”. No telling how many were going to other parts of the world with this message that Christ gave us from heaven. People traveled in those days also, it just took them a little longer. Christianity did not reach Rome until converts to the Gospel of Christ Jesus, as held in the gospel of Paul, returned to Rome, or made an initial visit. Paul staked claim to Rome for he said he would not build on another mans foundation, Romans 15:20. There were during the time of the Apostles two (2) foundation’s built on the foundation of Jesus Christ, one that Peter built, and one that Paul built.

Isn’t it true that Paul went West, and Peter to the East? We know where Paul went for we have a detailed account. But if we take your word, then we can know that Peter went East to India as you informed us of this fact when we were discussing the topic of “dispensationalism” a few weeks ago. Proof positive wouldn’t you say, and you agree for you know that Peter’s Pentecostal gospel could not have laid a foundation Rome. However you obviously doubt Paul’s gospel was the foundation of the church in Rome, for the Gentiles.

We see Phoebe in chapter 1:1 is entrusted with carrying the book of Romans, to Rome. To whom is Phoebe to deliver this new book of Romans? To “Priscilla and Aquila”, and the church in their home. So we know the Christian church was in Rome before Paul arrived, some 4 years after he wrote Romans from Corinth.

It would be some time before Paul got to Rome to establish the Gentile church/s, but by His preaching the foundation of Christ Jesus was already laid by the gospel of Paul. How do we know this? It is in the Word of God. ”And when they had appointed him a day, there came many to him into his lodging; to whom he expounded and testified the kingdom of God, persuading them concerning Jesus, both out of the law of Moses, and out of the prophets, from morning till evening. 24. And some believed the things which were spoken, and some believed not. 25. And when they agreed not among themselves, they departed, after that Paul had spoken one word, Well spake the Holy Ghost by Esaias the prophet unto our fathers, 26. Saying, Go unto this people, and say, Hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and not perceive: 27. For the heart of this people is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes have they closed; lest they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them. 28. Be it known therefore unto you, that the salvation of God is sent unto the Gentiles, and that they will hear it.”

What does Paul do after three days of his arriving in Rome. He goes to the Jew first, the “chiefs”, but things are going to change as we see above in verse 28. The people were interested in Paul’s gospel, some believing, and some not. The Christian church built upon the foundation of Jesus Christ was now in Rome for the Gentile, in the center of the Gentile world, just as it had been preached to those after Damascus Road.

So after all is said and done, the Christian gospel to the Gentile, and the Jew was carried out by Jews, and then the mantle was handed to the Gentiles to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ to this world, as God reconciles it unto Himself. And the only way this can be done is by the “dispensational” gospel that Christ from heaven gave to this Apostle “out of season”. We are still in that “season” that is “out of kilter” with what went before, and what will come after we are gone. Christian faith, ituttut.
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by OldRegular:
Actually some hyper-dispensationalists believe that only the prison Epistles of Paul apply to the churches. That is why they reject both water Baptism and the Lord's Supper though Paul endorsed both.????? Others accept that additional writings of Paul are appropriate for the churches and endorse the Lord's Supper but reject water Baptism???? [Ryrie, Dispensationalism, page 198ff]

How can anyone who rejects water Baptism be a Baptist?????
Who told you I reject the Lord's Supper? I didn't reject "water baptism" either to join the Baptist church. That is the way we join the Baptist church, so you are wrong on both counts. Joining the Baptist church had not one scintilla to do with my salvation. Do you believe “water baptism” saved you? Then you are not a Baptist after all.

It is the "great commission" that I don't believe in that you believe in and most Baptists, but either they 1 - are ignorant of what is contained in the "great commission"; 2 - know what it contains, but listens to tradition of man without understanding, or 3 - believe exactly like the Catholic church that "water baptism" saves them. Which of these apply to you?

I believe you are like most all in the churches of main line protestants. They accept Matthew and Luke, thinking that youngster Mark doesn't know what he is talking about. Christian faith, ituttut Galatians 1:11-12
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by OldRegular:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by ituttut:
These saved are of Paul, as they are Christians, and this is only possible to be so by believing the gospel of Christ Jesus from heaven.
So you are stating that all those who were saved by the preaching of the remaining 11 Apostles were not Christians?

Wonder what God thinks about this?
</font>[/QUOTE]But isn't it you saying they never understood Paul' gospel. But Peter won't let you get away with that, for Peter understood Paul's gospel as did the other Apostle's. It appears you don't believe Paul, and now you don't believe Peter. I wonder what Christ thinks about that?

Please read with understanding, Paul's letters and II Peter, 3:, ” And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; 16. As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.17. Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness. 18. But grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and for ever. Amen.” christian faith, ituttut
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by UZThD:
IMO monogenes is there (in the KJV, in John's 5 applications of that adjective to Christ) ) mistranslated , and IMO no divine Person begets the other divine Persons as each Person has all of God's attributes one of which is aseity.

UZ
To each his own, and I also believe the characteristic of God is self-derived. God has always existed, and does exist, but it happens to be the case that the Son of God exists. But if you take away the Body of God, does God not remain a Spirit, existing, but nothing happens? I believe a lot of these technical theological terms, are only for confusing the Word.

I can’t go along with any other translation for I believe Jesus Christ Bodily arose from the grave, and is now Bodily seated beside His Father in Heaven. We will see Christ Jesus, but will we see the Father? We are told every eye of those poor souls left in the tribulation will see Him, Christ Jesus, but no man has ever seen God; the only begotten Son in the bosom of the Father has declared him though.

If we don't believe in the Body of Christ, then can we believe in the Christian faith. There are a good number of people on this earth that don't believe in the resurrection, and a bodily resurrection, and this is an argument they use.

Translated “mono for only”, and genes for begotten” is good enough for me. Adam was created by God. Jesus Christ was Seed of God the Father, the Word becoming flesh, becoming the Son of God. Christian faith, ituttut
 
Top