All of the following statements contain either direct statements or indirect implications regarding Lockman’s commitment spread the Bible/the gospel.Please cite text from any message where I stated that the Lockman Foundation is "against the spread of the Gospel". You've said repeatedly that I've said that, but I clearly haven't. Reread my posts. You are putting words in my mouth (not necessarily on purpose, but at the very least you've misunderstood me).
From the original letter:
From subsequent posts:If were truly a non-profit ministry that sought to distribute the Word of God, as your mission statement states, you would not insist on being paid for it.
The advantage to this (from a Christian perspective) is obvious: since it is free and freely distributed, more people will read it and be exposed to the Gospel. Assuming that my assessment of your company's policies are accurate, I lift up their good example to you and ask you to consider it prayerfully.
The way you have framed these arguments could (and did) lead a reasonable person to believe that you are questioning Lockman’s commitment tp spread the Gospel, insinuating that they were against it unless they could get money from it.you'd think they would want to waive them if their priority was to spread the Gospel.
[omit disclaimer] … I'm just saying that money seems to be a higher piority to them than distributing God's Word, and so their actions don't seem to match up with their mission statement.
If their first priority was to distribute the Bible they would not do this. I freely admit that distributing Scripture could be their _second_ priority, in which case their mission statement should be revised to accurately reflect their priorities and policies.
I think there are Christians who are willing to give up a chance to make money in order to spread the Gospel.
I was actually trying to bow out several posts ago but wanted to clarify the “straw man” issue from my perspective.This conversation is starting to sound like a flame war, we should probably just agree to disagree and discontinue this for the sake of Christian unity. If I get a letter back from Lockman I'll post it here, but otherwise I've said what I have to say...
Again, my caution from the beginning was regarding attributing motives to people based on policies that you disagree with (whether rightly or wrongly). Words carry implications. If you do not mean them, then it would seem best to clear them up.