I have to disagree. Chronology should always follow a logical line of thought. For system of things that transpire to be logical but not chronological defies real logic.ReformedBaptist said:Again, I think this perplexity is resolved by learning to differentiate between chronology and logic. It is illogical to suppose a person has true faith in Christ, is being sanctified, et. without also having been delivered from the power of Satan. The one is the cause of the other.
Conversion, repentance, faith, sanctification, must all be, quite logically, the effect of union with Christ. Strong wrote, "The Scriptures declare that, through the operation of God, there is constituted a union of the soul with Christ different in kind from God’s natural and providential concursus with all spirits, as well as from all unions of mere association or sympathy, moral likeness, or moral influence,—a union of life, in which the human spirit, while then most truly possessing its own individuality and personal distinctness, is interpenetrated and energized by the Spirit of Christ, is made inscrutably but indissolubly one with him, and so becomes a member and partaker of that regenerated, believing, and justified humanity of which he is the head."
Amen.
You are bringing your presupposition to the text and do not allow the text to define itself. It does not state we believe by justification but that we are justified by faith. Faith is the vehicle to being justified.
Again here we find Mr Strong (along with the Reformed view - IMO) is incorrect on this issue not because I say so but because the scripture speaks expressly to the contrary. You are not dealing with the text brother. I am asking for a proper exegesis of the text I have given. I know what the Reformed view of regeneration is and that is why I wish to discuss scripture regarding not the 'what it does or is' but 'how it does this' prior to the excersizing of ones faith as the Reformed view believes. Point in fact, scripturally it can not be done. IF I am wrong then I am willing to see it and repent - seriously. However, what if I'm right? Are you seriously willing to search it out??
If so, can we continue in discussing the aspects of regeneration which the Reformed view holds transpire prior to faith logically and compare them to the scripture contextually? (I am not meaning to offend you brother because I do want to either know the truth as you understand it, or share the truth with you as I understand it)
It is this that I wish to discuss those verses which I believe contradict the notions afore mentioned contextually. As I stated many times, I agree that regeneration includes justification, sanctification, being both alive and in Christ, as well as being indwelt by the Holy Spirit. But the kicker is all those scriptures which state none of the above are imparted apart from the excersizing of faith - first!
I believe the scripture shows a logical order that is seen chronologically based upon the both the texts and cotext of the passages. Texts such as those I am speaking of here dealing not with what regeneration is (I agree here - except for the faith aspect) but how does it justify, sanctify, make one righteous, one alive and in Christ, and the indwelling of the Holy Spirit apart from faith being excersized first, as says the scriptures?