Jarthur001 said:
And where we go to another passage. Each point that is made, you reply by changing passages. Stick to one passage at a time.
As to the new passage by Paul, I have been over that many times to show you what it means, yet you still don't get it.
As to the ones that see the light...
This was yet another passage in Romans 1...to show you what Paul meant when using the word "know". It is knowing facts.
As to John was declaring that the Light has come which Isaiah prophesied...the passage you was talking about was in Matt 4, not John.
It is the SAME light that Matthew was speaking of, to which John was speaking. They aren't two different lights man! They are one and the same, bith refer to a spiritual light which is Christ and Christ 'gives' light to all men. Where in the world do you get you stuff from?
Secondly, I have not changed to any 'other' passages except with what you give and anything that is correllary (sp?). I would like you to deal with what I gave you refuting your veiw. I deal with what you give expressly but in context.
You keep saying they only know the facts about God. Well buddy, if they know the facts about God, sin, and judgment to come, they also know about their need for Him. The whole point is - they reject it as truth. They understand just as you and I do, but the only difference isn't 'understanding' you keep saying but receiving it as truth. There isn't a distinction in scripture between them knowing the facts about God and us knowing the facts about God.
It becomes pointless to repeat over and over. All men are in darkness and no one can see the light/understanding. It is when the new birth comes that man comes to the light. The passage in Matt which is a quote from Isa is talking about adding the elect to the kingdom. (please don't jump back to romans)
First off you haven't proven your first contention.
Secondly Yes, National Israel. To place the NT saints in that is contextual dishonestly. And BTW - I didn't cite Romans nor did I say Romans, I merely pointed out that Paul agrees with me
It is clear that those were born again for they once were in the dark and now they see.
Again with the contextual dishonestly. Scripture
never, no not ever, states they 'were' in darkness and 'now' they see. Scripture states IN Darkness they SEE. Look back again at the passages I have given. Show me one passage that states in the light they saw the light. No, it states IN the darkness they saw light.
This is the 3rd time you have asked...the 3rd time I will answer...and each time you say I will not. Your no prophet Allan.
YES <<<<< ANSWER.
But last time you asked if this was the same as the new birth.
which I said...
NO<<<<< ANSWER
So now you are contending that the 'regeneration' is not the new birth?
Please, make up your mind.
Regeneration means new life. If the first is true to which you agree then the second is also true which is established by the first.
All the other verse you posted in that list made no point.
LOL :laugh:
Oh but they did. They state that those IN darkness SAW the light and that IN the darkness God called them FROM it TO Himself. A complete and absolute contradiction of your view.
Allan...why is it that you have fooled your self into thinking you have made any points?
Your right James. Then show me what I am stating as refute to you is wrong. But it seems to apparent that no amount of scripture (taken in context) will get you to believe the scripture over your theological view. Deal with the scriptures I have given to show my error. The one you did deal with did not show any error because I was illistrating by Matt verse those in darkness SAW a great light. Those being National Isael to whom the context is expressly stating is in view. Israel as a Nation rejected Christ (those in darkness) but they still SAW a great light. They just rejected it.
Just like in the past you jump for victory, when one does not reply to each statement fully as you would like them too.
It is my OP and I can request you address each point to give discussion and debate to the thread which I generated. I have that right. I have done you the courtisy of dealing with each and every one you have given and I would, at the very least, expect such courtisy in return.
At times others see no need, for they are a waste of time. If however you really believe one or all of those other verses hits a big home run for your thoughts, please post them one at a times and I will address each passage. But the deal is...when I answer...do not jump to yet another passage. OK?
LOL ... that is what I have been asking of YOU. You don't deal with what I give. You make a snide remark and return to your pet thought.