Originally Posted by Jarthur001
Lets do this the easy way Allan.
This part was over your passage in Romans that you took us to when we were looking at John 1. I say that these people know about God, but never saw their need for God...which in my view is in all man because of sin nature. Therefore they rejected God, which is what sinful man does. Knowing God in Godly wisdom, is understanding your need for God in the 3 offices I posted before. You can agree or disagree. Just don't say I did not address your post.
And yet scripture decidedly contradicts you.
You say they didn't know their need but Rom1 states they know that those who do (sin) are worthy of death. It states they knew their sin and they knew what continuing in it would mean and who would deal out that judgment against their sin. The fact they knew the consequences of their deeds shows they also knew their need for Him yet they rejected Him for their own pleasures. They to follow Him or they would be condemned but chose not to.
I don't see how you can maintain your view that they don't know their need for Him. They don't respond positively to the knowledge of their need for Him but that does not detract from the fact they know.
I need not prove anything.
This is the debate side not the discussion side - it is kinda the nature of the beast brother.
Maybe you do not understand a light switch. Google "how does a light switch work" and it may "cast light" on the subject.
We are not talking about a light switch but scripture and with IT says.
Just read the ones you posted.
I have (that is why I posted them) and thus far you have stayed away from them.
But let us be clear.
The new birth comes before understanding.
The new birth is not by the will of man.
No, scripture states faith comes before the new birth.
Of course the new birth is not something a man by himself just up and decides he will do or have. Man can not make himself born again by sheer determination. God makes man born again after he has believed what God has revealed to him. (John 1:12,13) Regeneration follows after faith.
I have posted my views on Matt 4. You can reject them if you want.
Mat 4 is speaking of the Nation of Israel. However, since you are looking at that verse from your Reformed position (the Church has replaced Israel) I can set that one aside based upon a difference of view point in relation to eschatoloty.
That still leaves the others to be addressed.
Life was the light of men.
Understand?
Nope. Because if your point is true you would have to be a universalist because the scripture states shortly there-after that Jesus lights every man that comes into the world.
FROM OP...
answer 1.....YES
Life was the light of men.
answer 2...NO
Life was the light of men
This illistrates my point in spades .. you still didn't even answer the OP.
It is not a yes or no question but and which is it (this or that) question on both.