You are right. But let's try to understand terms that the Bible uses and not that men use.ReformedBaptist said:There will be no unity with error.
One thing I am learning in debating a Catholic friend (on the side) is that much human wisdom has been poured into the "earthen vessels." It is very hard to wash out the bad that has some good in it.
And both sides of these issues seem to be right at some points. I have acknowledged learning such from my Calvinist friends. They don't know they are friends but they are and have been very helpful to me in understanding belief vs. faith, the meaning of sin nature vs. sin guilt, the importance of a dispensational approach to scripture, etc.
But not Calvinism? Hmmm?? How do you think Catholics view your "error?" And biblicists every man-named "error" under the sun?As I grow in my understanding of the errors in the churches I am finding myself more and more in agreement with the men of God of old. This Arminian error, and the ugly head of Pelagianism, and other rational schemes contrary to divine revelation, should have by God grace the axe laid to the root of the tree.
skypair