av1611 (Watkins) does dmage their own credibility with the ranting and often sassing they do. If the old-liners had decades ago tried to sit down with the rebelling youth and discuss things reasonably (and didn't presuppose "older is always better), then maybe we wouldn't be having these controversies over music and translations today.
But to be fair, from what I have seen, they are nothing like landoverbaptist (which I see mentioned every now and then). I just looked at that for the first time, and that is SICK. In fact, is it even a real church? One of the pages said something at the bottom "Parody by Americhrist". It could be non-Christians mocking at how they view Christians. When they actually show a diagram of a woman inserting a menstrual device (which they are condemning), and say that pornography is OK for widows and over 65 (if you think about Christ and not lust), then that can't be for real.
Then KJVO/anti-CCM ministries mentioned here are nothing like that, but they can be irrational at times leading people to think they are at least heading in that direction.
But to be fair, from what I have seen, they are nothing like landoverbaptist (which I see mentioned every now and then). I just looked at that for the first time, and that is SICK. In fact, is it even a real church? One of the pages said something at the bottom "Parody by Americhrist". It could be non-Christians mocking at how they view Christians. When they actually show a diagram of a woman inserting a menstrual device (which they are condemning), and say that pornography is OK for widows and over 65 (if you think about Christ and not lust), then that can't be for real.
Then KJVO/anti-CCM ministries mentioned here are nothing like that, but they can be irrational at times leading people to think they are at least heading in that direction.