• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Palin in the Oval Office in '12?????

Status
Not open for further replies.

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
For me, it's not that Palin is stepping down, per se, that is the problem. It's that she hasn't given a specific reason for doing so.

You are wrong. She did give a reason for quitting: it was because of frivolous ethics complaints brought by people like you the state had spent $2 million dollars that could have been better spent elsewhere. Also her family had spent $500,000 or were that much in debt because of frivolous ethics complaints brought by people like you.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Frivolous complaints? You mean like the nonsense over the President's birth certificate?

It wasn't frivolous when they investigated McCain. And any frivolousness could be done away with by coming up with the long form rather than fighting against it with lawyers.But if course you and I are both off topic aren't we.
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I can't wait to start reading Palin's memoris and quitting half way through. Of course I would not be quitting, but stopping for "higher callings."
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Would that higher calling be the rereading of "bo"s books? I suspect it would!

Pathetic!

Either you did not understand the humor or you have no sense of humor. This is a joke going around Alaska at the moment ... or so I have been told.
 

Petra-O IX

Active Member
It is speculated that the higher calling the Palin is refering to is making a boatload of money from book deals, reality shows, the talk circuits etc. She has speculated about this before. It is easier than staying committed to the Governership of Alaska.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
It is speculated that the higher calling the Palin is refering to is making a boatload of money from book deals, reality shows, the talk circuits etc. She has speculated about this before. It is easier than staying committed to the Governership of Alaska.

Who are the "its" who are speculating? "bo" lovers!
 

targus

New Member
There is another thread in this forum in which the consensus seems to be that a politician that is running for an office than the one that they are currently holding should resign because they are not actually doing what they were elected to do by campaigning for a different office.

If Palin is seriously considering a 2012 run for President she may have decided that she has her work cut out for her and is simply getting started now. More than just campaigning for the nomination she will have to get the Republican party re-organized and moved back to conservative values if any Republican is going to win in 2012. Such a rebuilding of the Republican party IMO would be a "higher calling".

If she indeed left the office of Govenor of Alaska to seriously lay the ground work for running for President then it should be also the consensus that she did the right thing in resigning.
 

targus

New Member
Either you did not understand the humor or you have no sense of humor. This is a joke going around Alaska at the moment ... or so I have been told.

It would seem that you to did not understand the humor of his repsonse or that you also no sense of humor.

And no one even needed to tell me that his post was a joke !!!
 

Petra-O IX

Active Member
Who are the "its" who are speculating? "bo" lovers!

Careful there Old Regular, nasty name calling might get you banned from the board.
From KTLA website:http://www.ktla.com/news/landing/ktla-sarah-palin,0,178319.story


Johnston says he lived with the Palin family from early December to the second week in January. He claims he heard the governor several times say how nice it would be to take advantage of the lucrative deals that were being offered, including a reality show and a book.

Even the most elitist fo the Conservatives such as Krauthammer have turned their backs on Palin.
 

targus

New Member
Johnston says he lived with the Palin family from early December to the second week in January. He claims he heard the governor several times say how nice it would be to take advantage of the lucrative deals that were being offered, including a reality show and a book.

Palin's daughter's ex-boyfriend - now there is a credible source...:laugh:
 

Petra-O IX

Active Member
Palin's daughter's ex-boyfriend - now there is a credible source...:laugh:

What is credible is that a woman running for the VP spot would allow this young man to live in her house. Do you believe it is O.K. for young unmarried people to live togethor? Appparently Sarah did.
It don't get any better than that.:laugh:
 

targus

New Member
What is credible is that a woman running for the VP spot would allow this young man to live in her house. Do you believe it is O.K. for young unmarried people to live togethor? Appparently Sarah did.
It don't get any better than that.:laugh:

You are making assumptions which are unwarranted. You assume that Sarah Palin and her husband allowed this young man to share sleeping quarters with their daughter. It is equally plausible that they had him bunking in another room and that they supervised his activites closely.

You should check the unChrisitan attitude.
 

Petra-O IX

Active Member
You are making assumptions which are unwarranted. You assume that Sarah Palin and her husband allowed this young man to share sleeping quarters with their daughter. It is equally plausible that they had him bunking in another room and that they supervised his activites closely.

You should check the unChrisitan attitude.

So you agree that it is o.k for even the appearance of sin to be existing in a household. I don't have those kind of values.
Hey Targus, why don't we spend the remainder of this thread calling each other unChristian. Your attitude is not one iota better than mine.
Hey Old Regular, looks like we have another "bo"lover.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

targus

New Member
So you agree that it is o.k for even the appearance of sin to be existing in a household. I don't have those kind of values.
The appearance of sin in such a situation would be in the eye of the beholder.

It is not my place to make assumptions about activities in their home of which I have no knowledge.

Hey Targus, why don't we spend the remainder of this thread calling each other unChristian. Your attitude is not one iota better than mine.

I did not say that you are unChristian. I am saying that your assumption that there is sin involved in that particular situation when you do not have such knowledge is unChristian.

Hey Old Regular, looks like we have another "bo"lover.

I am sorry but the meaing of this comment is lost on me.
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So you agree that it is o.k for even the appearance of sin to be existing in a household. I don't have those kind of values.
Hey Targus, why don't we spend the remainder of this thread calling each other unChristian. Your attitude is not one iota better than mine.
Hey Old Regular, looks like we have another "bo"lover.

Letting the boyfriend move into the house is not, in my opinion, setting a good example for others. I would never allow a boy or girl friend to move into my house with my kids. There are enough opportunities for trouble in normal life. Put two teenagers, with teenager hormones in the same house and it is simply asking for trouble ... no matter how good the kids are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top