Agreed! If running a state as insignificant as Alaska, which her resigning before completing the job indicates, she would never be able to govern the U.S.
So then Obama is completely incompetent based on this reasoning.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Agreed! If running a state as insignificant as Alaska, which her resigning before completing the job indicates, she would never be able to govern the U.S.
I do not remember anyone complaining of any word being broken during Obama's campaign or anyone conservative or otherwise. Obama is as big a quitter as Palin if that is the standard.
Right or wrong it is a common practice in politics.
==That does not make it moral, right, or justifiable. Just because "everybody else is doing it" is not an excuse. It is wrong when one does it, it is wrong when they all do it. It is wrong, it is dishonest, it is crooked, it is wrong.
Abortion is common practice in this country, but I'll still stand up and say it's wrong as well.
You did with your "bam". It's very easy to read your "bam" as "See, the Clinton's did it, so why is there a problem with Palin doing it?"
So then Obama is completely incompetent based on this reasoning.
Obama didn't quit anything to my knowoeldge, why would you put him in this?
Did he fulfill his obligation in the Senate?
He got a promotion to president, it is normal to leave one job when you get promoted. I can't remember one recent politician besides Reagan and Nixon who didn't quit when they made president or Senate.
What makes Palin different is she quit with no place to go. She is declaring a higher calling then says the ethics charges made her administration ineffective. That's like saying I will be Gov when everyone likes me and I can generally get my way but when it calls for the real politics of compromise and give and take then she quit. She is probably afraid of the record one amasses with give and take. That's when you didn't get your way, you just did the best you could for the people you represent.
It also sound like she has quit every previous elected position with no place to go. I don't know if that's fact.
I guess the party of no wouldn't know about that...
What the spinner you are. He failed to finish his obligation as a Senator. And that goes for everyone who does that.
So if a person gets promoted on their job from say supervisor to manager, you saying they quit as supervisor to become a manager? What kind of logic is that???
It is not quitting when you move up, it is getting promoted. Quitting is what you leave with no where to go.
So by your theory every governor or congressman who makes president is a quitter. Get a grip Rev...
He got a promotion to president, it is normal to leave one job when you get promoted. I can't remember one recent politician besides Reagan and Nixon who didn't quit when they made president or Senate.
What makes Palin different is she quit with no place to go. She is declaring a higher calling then says the ethics charges made her administration ineffective. That's like saying I will be Gov when everyone likes me and I can generally get my way but when it calls for the real politics of compromise and give and take then she quit. She is probably afraid of the record one amasses with give and take. That's when you didn't get your way, you just did the best you could for the people you represent.
It also sound like she has quit every previous elected position with no place to go. I don't know if that's fact.
I guess the party of no wouldn't know about that...
... If both McCain and Obama had resigned, the republican party would have lost McCain in the Senate. Neither party wants to do this.
For me, it's not that Palin is stepping down, per se, that is the problem. It's that she hasn't given a specific reason for doing so. For instance, if she said that she intended to seek the presidential nomination in 2012, I would understand. Or, if she said that there were personal or family reasons, that would also be understandable.
BTW, politicians from both parties regularly run for higher office without resigning from their current position. I believe one reason for this would be is that the losing party would lose a valuable leader. If both McCain and Obama had resigned, the republican party would have lost McCain in the Senate. Neither party wants to do this.
RS, perhaps you should file an ethics violation complaint for not confiding in you more!:thumbs:For me, it's not that Palin is stepping down, per se, that is the problem. It's that she hasn't given a specific reason for doing so.
All of this will not look good on her Presidential resume if she chooses to run in 2012. It is not good to quit because you can't take the heat and being a quitter really, really sets a poor example.He got a promotion to president, it is normal to leave one job when you get promoted. I can't remember one recent politician besides Reagan and Nixon who didn't quit when they made president or Senate.
What makes Palin different is she quit with no place to go. She is declaring a higher calling then says the ethics charges made her administration ineffective. That's like saying I will be Gov when everyone likes me and I can generally get my way but when it calls for the real politics of compromise and give and take then she quit. She is probably afraid of the record one amasses with give and take. That's when you didn't get your way, you just did the best you could for the people you represent.
It also sound like she has quit every previous elected position with no place to go. I don't know if that's fact.
I guess the party of no wouldn't know about that...