• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Pat Robinson and Hati

Did Haiti have a pact with the Devil?

  • Pat Robinson is absolutely right

    Votes: 4 10.5%
  • Pat may have a point

    Votes: 5 13.2%
  • Pat is on shaky ground

    Votes: 5 13.2%
  • Pat is totally wrong

    Votes: 3 7.9%
  • Pat is a nut case

    Votes: 18 47.4%
  • Other answer

    Votes: 3 7.9%

  • Total voters
    38

Eric B

Active Member
Site Supporter
Certainly in the case of Sodom and Gomarrah, for instance, God judged their behavior to be 'over the top'. Do you ask God why he had the nerve, the nerve! to judge them in that way when all peoples were sinful? Genesis 18:20 says, "their sin is exceedingly grave.'"

Again, if I were Pat Robertson I wouldn't have made that comment at the time that he did, but are you sure that it's wrong to speculate on God's judgements here on earth? Unless you think He's not in that line of work anymore.
Peter (2 peter 2:6) said that the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah was meant to be an example, something that was to be paid attention. Pat Robertson isn't the first who has called on us to humble ourselves in the face of a disaster, preachers have done this for centuries.
The Sodom and Gomorrah story, like all the others in the Bible, did not occur in a vacuum. But that's how these doctrines get formed and then justified. Just take it like it occurred in a vacuum. Sodom and Gomorrah, just like Pharaoah and the Canaanites after them, were people who were in the way of Abraham and his descendants, whom God had chosen, and was leading (both physically from one place to another, as well as spiritually, of course). God did not arbitraily decide to pick one nation and punish their sins, and they certainly weren't the only one's practicing homosexuality or any other "over the top" sin. Hence, you don't hear of Him punishing Far Eastern Asians, South Pacific, subSaharan Africa or the Americas. Those people did not cross paths with Abraham/Israel.

So likewise, today, you would have to show that Haiti was in a similar position. That God had chosen one nation or group, and the Haitians and their sin was posing a threat. That would make perfect sense, because after all, this same line of reasoning has traditionally held America up as practically the new "Israel", whom God is specially working with, and our own sins are bringing "judgment" on us too, just like Israel. So America is Israel, and I guess Haiti must be Canaan, or Sodom. Both will be destroyed in judgment, except for those preaching this (who always seem spared from these things), who are the modern "faithful" prophets. See where this line of reasoning leads? It's all self-promotion, ultimately.

And now, even the NT proof-text doesn't fit, as Peter is not even talking about nations, but rather the judgment of false prophets. And most of the other prophecies refer to those who follow the Antichrist or turn out to be false Christians. So instead of nations, it's now the true believers vs false believers. After all, the Church is now the "holy nation". This shows God is no longer judging people by nation, but by individual, and spiritually.
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Maybe so, on Sodam & Gomorrah. But do you really think 9/11 occurred because of homosexuality in America? There are other countries with more homosexuals, and more liberal sexuality laws, that have not suffered a major terrorist attack in recent years.
Indeed. If God is still in the business of smiting OT-style, then it would no difficult thing for him to send a tsunami to wipe the Netherlands off the map.
 

dcorbett

Active Member
Site Supporter
Well, here is one conservative pastor who thinks it is ridiculous to think a person can know what God is thinking. And I think PR is a heretic idiot who happens to be a false prophet... He preaches the heretical prosperity false gospel.. thinks he can heal people.. and makes predictions like a new age prophet...PR does not speak for Christians...
He is a preacher from Hell!

That's pushing the edge of the envelope, Brother. You are doing to him exactly what you accuse him of doing to others - I think Robertson needs to back away and be quiet on national and international issues. But I won't say he is from hell....However, I will say this: I respect him as much as I respect Jesse Jackson.....preachers should stay out of politics and stick to the gospel!!
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A couple of points by way of rejoinder: first, you can't keep the Gospel out of politics, whether you're talking about justice for the poor or protecting the unborn (to quote but two examples). Secondly, one can and sometimes should judge a tree by it's fruit: if someone is spouting heretical and dangerous (since it potentially influences the behaviour of millions of Americans with TV sets) statements every five minutes, it's right to call them on that. Although he and I don't and won't agree on everything, I don't see Tim spouting in that way, but I do see Pat doing that.
 

NiteShift

New Member
Secondly, one can and sometimes should judge a tree by it's fruit: if someone is spouting heretical and dangerous (since it potentially influences the behaviour of millions of Americans with TV sets) statements every five minutes, it's right to call them on that...I do see Pat doing that.

And you think Pat Robertson makes heretical statements every five minutes? Have you actually watched him for five minutes? The best evidence you could come up with earlier was the whole "walks like a duck" thing.;)
 

NiteShift

New Member
Eric B said:
So likewise, today, you would have to show that Haiti was in a similar position. That God had chosen one nation or group, and the Haitians and their sin was posing a threat. That would make perfect sense, because after all, this same line of reasoning has traditionally held America up as practically the new "Israel", whom God is specially working with, and our own sins are bringing "judgment" on us too, just like Israel. So America is Israel, and I guess Haiti must be Canaan, or Sodom. Both will be destroyed in judgment, except for those preaching this (who always seem spared from these things), who are the modern "faithful" prophets. See where this line of reasoning leads? It's all self-promotion, ultimately… This shows God is no longer judging people by nation, but by individual, and spiritually.

No one has to show that America is the new Israel or that Haiti is the new Canaan to think that God still judges nations. That is just your model, and when has God said that is the only model he would use?

The Bible speaks of disaster or destruction regarding: Sodom, Gomorrah, Babylon, Tyre, Nineveh, Egypt, and others. These were meant to be examples, as Peter says, and that others should learn from that example.

Jesus said it was meant to bring about repentence - "Woe unto thee, Chorazin! woe unto thee, Bethsaida! for if the mighty works, which were done in you, had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes. But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the day of judgment, than for you." Jesus was speaking of judgements against cities, not just individuals.

I do not know if the earthquake in Haiti was a judgement. I don’t know if God is judging America. I don’t receive revelations like that from God. But you want to put the question out of bounds, as if it were wrong to ask. And really, that is all Pat Robertson was doing, asking the question.
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oh gosh, where to start? Well, there's the whole Christian dominionism thing. Throw in a bit of anti-semitism (see The New World Order), some dodgy-dealings with indicted war criminal Charles Taylor and former Zairean President Mobutu (diamonds, it seems, are not just a girl's best friend but Pat's too), false claims about the power of his prayers, whether to heal people or divert hurricanes, and you get the picture.

I haven't heard Tim do any of that.

[reply to NiteShift's first post on this page]
 

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
NiteShift sez:
I do not know if the earthquake in Haiti was a judgement. I don’t know if God is judging America. I don’t receive revelations like that from God. But you want to put the question out of bounds, as if it were wrong to ask. And really, that is all Pat Robertson was doing, asking the question.
Unfortunately, some Christians still think that God is all love, chocolates and roses, and the extent of His judgment is a stern "TSK, TSK, TSK, naughty, naughty boy!"

They can't quite grasp the idea that HE is '- the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow-", and HE was quite judgmental in the past!!

Interesting, that to even suggest that God is judging, is almost considered heretical by some.

Oh well, such happens when His word is usurped by liberal ideas.
 

NiteShift

New Member
NiteShift sez: Unfortunately, some Christians still think that God is all love, chocolates and roses, and the extent of His judgment is a stern "TSK, TSK, TSK, naughty, naughty boy!"

They can't quite grasp the idea that HE is '- the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow-", and HE was quite judgmental in the past!!

Interesting, that to even suggest that God is judging, is almost considered heretical by some.

Oh well, such happens when His word is usurped by liberal ideas.

The whole collective guilt thing is just so darn old-fashioned
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Really? I guess He didn't get your memo, then, in eg: Luke 13:1-4, which is also in the New Testament.
 

NiteShift

New Member
Really? I guess He didn't get your memo, then, in eg: Luke 13:1-4, which is also in the New Testament.

Jesus was warning against the sin of self-righteousness in that case.

He affirmed elsewhere that God does indeed judge cities and nations. And also that He himself will be judging nations: "When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory. All the nations will be gathered before Him and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats."
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Well, that's one interpretation of Matt 24:31-46, I suppose; however, even if you are correct in your interpretation, I would question the wisdom of this degree of realised eschatology and seeking to usurp the role rightly ascribed solely to God.
 

Eric B

Active Member
Site Supporter


No one has to show that America is the new Israel or that Haiti is the new Canaan to think that God still judges nations. That is just your model, and when has God said that is the only model he would use?

The Bible speaks of disaster or destruction regarding: Sodom, Gomorrah, Babylon, Tyre, Nineveh, Egypt, and others. These were meant to be examples, as Peter says, and that others should learn from that example.

Jesus said it was meant to bring about repentence - "Woe unto thee, Chorazin! woe unto thee, Bethsaida! for if the mighty works, which were done in you, had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes. But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the day of judgment, than for you." Jesus was speaking of judgements against cities, not just individuals.

I do not know if the earthquake in Haiti was a judgement. I don’t know if God is judging America. I don’t receive revelations like that from God. But you want to put the question out of bounds, as if it were wrong to ask. And really, that is all Pat Robertson was doing, asking the question.
The "model" God would use would be the same one He actually DID use in scripture (and it's your side always citing "same today, yesterday and forever"!) And we see, all of those nations you listed are those who came into contact with Israel or its patriarchs.
And again, they were used in the NT as examples of what would happen to false prophets and Christ rejectors., NOT people by nation anymore.

The people being urged to repent in the NT examples are the readers or people Christ was speaking to. If He was trying to get Tyre and Sodom to repent, then He would have simply sent prophets, since He says they would have repented.
NiteShift sez: Unfortunately, some Christians still think that God is all love, chocolates and roses, and the extent of His judgment is a stern "TSK, TSK, TSK, naughty, naughty boy!"

They can't quite grasp the idea that HE is '- the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow-", and HE was quite judgmental in the past!!

Interesting, that to even suggest that God is judging, is almost considered heretical by some.
Oh well, such happens when His word is usurped by liberal ideas.
This is all just memorized, straw-man jargon. No one here has said God is all chocolates and roses. There might be some like that, but not in this discussion. Yet this is what's leveled at us any time someone has some "hard doctrine" they are trying to justify.
The reason people here are opposing it, is because it smacks of self-righteousness. Like God is sparing you because of your righteousness (Even if that "righteousness" is said to be in "following" Him!) Compared to these "heathen" nations, or segments of our nation, even.
And if God is not sending judgment, then it is because of Grace, not chocolate and roses. Do not spurn His grace to others (like the workers in the vineyard). Tragedy happens to everyone, regardless of their standing with God. You (or PR) should be thankful He has neither allowed tragedy OR sent judgment to you, instead of gloating about someone else's sinfulness and how they deserved their tragedy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

NiteShift

New Member
Well, that's one interpretation of Matt 24:31-46,

How did we get from Luke 13:1-4 to Matthew 24:31-46?

Matt Black said:
I suppose; however, even if you are correct in your interpretation, I would question the wisdom of this degree of realised eschatology and seeking to usurp the role rightly ascribed solely to God.

Himmel! Is that what I've done?
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
How did we get from Luke 13:1-4 to Matthew 24:31-46?
Er...I think that was you:

NiteShift said:
He affirmed elsewhere that God does indeed judge cities and nations. And also that He himself will be judging nations: "When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory. All the nations will be gathered before Him and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats."




Himmel! Is that what I've done?
Not you, no, but Pat is on rather thin ice.
 

NiteShift

New Member
Er...I think that was you:

No, I quoted Matthew 25:31-32 "When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his throne in heavenly glory. All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats."
 
Top