Playmate porn star and reality TV contestant in court over Trump

[Baptist Believer]

Tantrum

I'm sure you imagine I am having a tantrum. It goes along with the rest of your delusions. I am perfectly fine, but I am always astounded by so-called Christians who think nothing of lying and making false accusations. How can one be a Christian and not feel obligated to be truthful?

There's little point in speaking with your further since almost everything you have said recently is a false accusation.

There are six things that the Lord hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers. - Proverbs 6:16-19

You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor. - Exodus 20:16

A false witness will not go unpunished, and he who breathes out lies will perish. - Proverbs 19:9

You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies. - John 8:44

You shall not spread a false report. You shall not join hands with a wicked man to be a malicious witness. - Exodus 23:1

A false witness will not go unpunished, and he who breathes out lies will not escape. - Proverbs 19:5

I would be if I ignored those in need.

Matt. 25:41 “Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels: 42 for I was hungry and you gave Me no food; I was thirsty and you gave Me no drink; 43 I was a stranger and you did not take Me in, naked and you did not clothe Me, sick and in prison and you did not visit Me.’

Matt. 25:44 “Then they also will answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?’ 45 Then He will answer them, saying, “Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ 46 And these will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.”​

Not saying you're going to Hell, but this passage should at least make you want to help the unborn in an actual tangible way that actually helps.

You assume that I don't help the unborn in tangible ways.

Looking at the passage you quoted, if you support President Trump's domestic agenda, Jesus might have an issue with you regarding hunger, thirst, dealing with strangers (immigrants), the poor, the sick, and prisoners.

If calling out self-righteous Christians on their complacency on voting pro-life is evil, then guilty as charged.

You have assumed I am complacent.

I think some convicting talk might be in order.

I doubt anyone will be "convicted" by what you write since you have such a tenuous relationship with the truth.

 

[Calminian]

I'm sure you imagine I am having a tantrum.......

The sheer length of your rants, alone, betrays you. You've been called out and you're tantruming.

 

[Baptist Believer]

The sheer length of your rants, alone, betrays you. You've been called out and you're tantruming.

I have been libelled, and you are the one solely responsible.

 

[Calminian]

I have been libelled, and you are the one solely responsible.

You've been called out on your pacivipty and now are having a good old fashioned tantrum.

And I stand by everything I've said.

 

[FollowTheWay]

I don't know I wasn't there when it happened (or didn't happen).

Actually as we learned in the 60 Minutes interview, the sex wasn';t the important thing. It was about Trump sending a thug to threaten to kill her if she didn't shut up.

 

[FollowTheWay]

Do good Christians support abortion, homosexual rights, and homosexual marriage? The Bible, not the book of my brand of Republicanism calls those sins murder and abomination.

You need to familiarize yourself with Carter's position on those issues.

If you think Trump is a better example of a Christian than Carter you'd better examine yourself.

 

[InTheLight]

Actually as we learned in the 60 Minutes interview, the sex wasn';t the important thing. It was about Trump sending a thug to threaten to kill her if she didn't shut up.

We don't know that Trump sent a thug to threaten Stormy Daniels.

For example, I can think of a couple of people on BB that would probably do it and would do it for free with no prompting from Trump. Such is the life of Trump sycophants.

 

[Calminian]

We don't know that Trump sent a thug to threaten Stormy Daniels.

For example, I can think of a couple of people on BB that would probably do it and would do it for free with no prompting from Trump. Such is the life of Trump sycophants.

Or it could have been a neverTrumper RINO trying to set up the story. Wouldn't put it past those Trump haters.

 

[Benjamin]

I wonder how much the whore got paid for her 60 Minutes of time while trying to make the Dems dreams come true?

NEWS FLASH for these high dollar profession whores trying to cash in with claims to have put out for Trump and are publicizing their trade in front of the world, ...it merely amounts to partaking in vindictive gossip and I am not interested in hearing it.

As for other motives, what is this about? ...oddly enough, Moral value superiority. As if, the President being proven to be promiscuous should be a source of pride to build up the Democratic moral superiority illusion or actually give them an valid argument based on loose women taking sides with Dems and talking about their alleged deeds afterward.

As if the allegations were true, it would give reason to abandon the president and his policies. No, it merely would go to prove the Democrats have nothing ore to stand on other than their hypocrisy and their feeble claims of moral superiority toward Republican values.

It is an incredibly fallacious argument and I feel embarrassed for anyone ignorant enough who would attempt to use this situation as a valid or meaningful argument to draw conclusions from about whether our President's policies should be supported or not.

 

[InTheLight]

It is an incredibly fallacious argument and I feel embarrassed for anyone ignorant enough who would attempt to use this situation as a valid or meaningful argument to draw conclusions from about whether our President's policies should be supported or not.

Awesome strawman ya got there!


Sent from my Pixel 2 XL

 

[Calminian]

Awesome strawman ya got there!

How so?

 

[FollowTheWay]

Tantrum.



I would be if I ignored those in need.

Matt. 25:41 “Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels: 42 for I was hungry and you gave Me no food; I was thirsty and you gave Me no drink; 43 I was a stranger and you did not take Me in, naked and you did not clothe Me, sick and in prison and you did not visit Me.’

Matt. 25:44 “Then they also will answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?’ 45 Then He will answer them, saying, “Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ 46 And these will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.”​

Not saying you're going to Hell, but this passage should at least make you want to help the unborn in an actual tangible way that actually helps.



If calling out self-righteous Christians on their complacency on voting pro-life is evil, then guilty as charged. We've just crossed the 60 million mark, just in the US and just since RvW. That's triple the murders of Stalin and 10x the holocaust. I think some convicting talk might be in order.

The self righteous ones are the ones who claim the Republican party is really going to do anything about abortion. Isn't 45 years long enough to take action?

 

[Calminian]

The self righteous ones are the ones who claim the Republican party is really going to do anything about abortion. Isn't 45 years long enough to take action?

Says the guy that's been sitting on his butt.

Not every war can be won, but I commend those on the frontline fighting for the unborn, especially with guys like you aiding and abetting the enemy.

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

We don't know that Trump sent a thug to threaten Stormy Daniels.

For example, I can think of a couple of people on BB that would probably do it and would do it for free with no prompting from Trump. Such is the life of Trump sycophants.

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

I have been libelled, and you are the one solely responsible.

Report him. Also put the pest on ignore.

 

[Benjamin]

The whore being propped up by the Democrats to cash in and gossip about her supposed "services" to the President is now wanting to sue for defamation of her character. ...you can't make this stuff up!...

 

[Benjamin]

How so?

When ITL starts trying to use philosophical terms to defend his arguments he just made, which he also typically claims he isn't making, I just imagine his definitions as cute little Archie Bunker like comments and ignore them because it doesn't do any good to try to break these terms down for him.

 

[InTheLight]

When ITL starts trying to use philosophical terms to defend his arguments he just made, which he also typically claims he isn't making, I just imagine his definitions as cute little Archie Bunker like comments and ignore them because it doesn't do any good to try to break these terms down for him.

It's so simple.

No one on BB is saying that President Trump's policies should not be supported because he has been accused of having an affair with Stormy Daniels. Ergo, that is a strawman argument. I don't know why this needs to be explained.

And I didn't make an argument, I made an observation about your argument.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

[Benjamin]

It's so simple.

No one on BB is saying that President Trump's policies should not be supported because he has been accused of having an affair with Stormy Daniels. Ergo, that is a strawman argument. I don't know why this needs to be explained.

Then, what is your (their) point? What is your (their) goal? What is it you (they) hope to accomplish with this agenda if not to put -down- the man making the policies?

And I didn't make an argument, I made an observation about your argument.

Funny "you" felt compelled to put up your argument (yes, that was an "argument", philosophically speaking ) to defend against my argument...

Quack, quack..

 

[Gold Dragon]

We don't know that Trump sent a thug to threaten Stormy Daniels.

For example, I can think of a couple of people on BB that would probably do it and would do it for free with no prompting from Trump. Such is the life of Trump sycophants.

Stormy Daniels claims this person who threatened her did so in 2011 before Trump was ever involved in politics and only a handful of people knew of any relationship she had with Trump.

Yes, today there would be many true believers who would threaten her without any sort of payment. In 2011 there was probably some cash involved.

This Vox article has the copy of the lawsuit filed by Daniels against Trump which includes the original non-disclosure agreement that Trump did not sign that you can read for yourself.

Stormy Daniels’s legal battle against Trump, explained