Well, I tried.
Wonder why he doesn't want to know who wrote that?
Wonder why he doesn't want to know who wrote that?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Todd W. White said:Well, I tried.
Wonder why he doesn't want to know who wrote that?![]()
Adrian Rogers?Oh - anyone want to venture a guess as to who the author of the dissertation is?
Ed, how can you understand end time events if you can't define words properly?2Th 2:3 (KJV1611 Editiin):
Let no man deceiue you by any meanes, for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sinne bee reuealed, the sonne of perdition,
I agree Amy. Ed's 'apparent' definition of falling away is not correct. The context is that due to this falling away the son of perdition will be revealed or made known to all. WHY? Because of the great falling away from truth to the embracing or error and sin. He can not be revealed or better he would not be received by the majority until the majority of world is ready to recieve his words and embrace his new doctrines which is to replace truth with errorAmy.G said:Ed, how can you understand end time events if you can't define words properly?
"Falling away" does not mean rapture. Please show me a definition from a valid source that states the "falling away" means people being lifted off the earth.
The word here is "apostasia", meaning forsake. It is referring to a forsaking of the faith.
Strong's: G646 apostasia ä-po-stä-sē'-ä to forsake, falling away
Compare:
1Ti 4:1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;
Strongs: G868 aphistēmi ä-fē'-stā-mē depart, draw away, fall away, refrain, withdraw self, depart from
:thumbs:Allan said:I agree Amy. Ed's 'apparent' definition of falling away is not correct. The context is that due to this falling away the son of perdition will be revealed or made known to all. WHY? Because of the great falling away from truth to the embracing or error and sin. He can not be revealed or better he would not be received by the majority until the majority of world is ready to recieve his words and embrace his new doctrines which is to replace truth with error
back at-cha :thumbs:Amy.G said::thumbs:
(must add more words......Happy New Year!)
If he's still alive maybe he will respond to my questions and comments in post 182.
Todd W. White said:Grasshopper said -
Sorry, he's not, but I'll try to find if he answered questions similar to it.
Grasshopper said:Well, since you have done an indepth study of Daniel(Beth Moore perhaps?), you can explain to all of us why we should assume a gap in Daniel's 70 weeks.
Originally Posted by Grasshopper
Well, since you have done an indepth study of Daniel(Beth Moore perhaps?), you can explain to all of us why we should assume a gap in Daniel's 70 weeks.
OldRegular said:This is off topic but no one seems to be able to address the OP!:BangHead: :BangHead:
Marcia said:I think Todd White did a good job and he used scripture.
Marcia said:I think Todd White did a good job and he used scripture.
There is not just a single verse or two to support this view, as someone else said. It's a matter of putting various scriptures together.
This is an interesting article on Daniel's 70th week:
http://www.truthnet.org/endtimes/4/
I really do not want to spend much time on this thread because I think it's futile.
I think Todd White did a good job and he used scripture.
He has not responded to my answer and I used Scripture!
Todd W. White said:We've addressed that, OR - I said that I would attempt to find the original author's answers to these or similar questions, and post them. If they cannot be found, I would do my modest best to do so instead.