I agree....
Me too, he just needs to back his dating up about 20 yrs to 70 A.D......
Last edited by a moderator:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I agree....
Me too, he just needs to back his dating up about 20 yrs to 70 A.D......
You've already skipped ahead. Does the Bible even teach a 7 year tribulation as the pre-tribbers believe??? You have to define and defend "tribulation" before you put a timing of rapture on it.
But you are presuming a 7 year hell-on-earth scenario that doesn't really have much biblical support. So the time of the rapture around those 7 years becomes moot. If there is no 7 year terror fest, then the timing of the rapture just does not matter b/c it doesn't exist.....still, this is not an answer, it is more of a question. I'd like to know how many believers are truly ready for what happens next if the rapture is in fact delayed.
If God didn't spare His people and those in the NT from death, torture, and imprisonment, what makes us think we may be able to avoid or miss the events of the last days?
But you are presuming a 7 year hell-on-earth scenario that doesn't really have much biblical support. So the time of the rapture around those 7 years becomes moot. If there is no 7 year terror fest, then the timing of the rapture just does not matter b/c it doesn't exist.
Does one believe in the Body of Christ? Then we must believe in the Rapture. Why? Because the Rapture applies only to those in the Body of Christ. Does this not make necessary those who believe this to automatically be predisposed to pre-mil, and pre-trib? Perhaps not, but I don't see how we can believe the gospel as shown to be Paul's, should they believe otherwise.Dr. Fuller, the founder of Fuller Seminary, was a strong supporter of Dispensational Pre-millennial point of view. However, close to his death he said that he could not find the Pre-trib Rapture anywhere in the Bible, but he still believes it.
Is this doctrine in the Bible?
First of all, I'm not a preterist---I'm simply making some comments that have to be overcome and it is easy to hit 9 on this machine as with any other number considering it is not normally used for moderating.Mr Moderator, If you are going to be a preterist, at least get your dates correct. It's AD 70 not AD 90.
Yes, you could very well be correct. I simply threw out some issues that have always bothered me and that is what we are looking for is the interretation of the original text and what it means to us today. I did not mean to lay out an absolute conclusion; simply point out some questions I have had trouble answering and yes, that is a very good interpretation which could fit the bill. I did not grow up as a preterest, but in trying to justify the pre-trib rapture, I have found the Bible lacking in clear descriptions in this area. I am not a Biblical 'future-world' expert and simply throwing out some remarks that seem to be taken out of context when Mathew 24 is read in its entirety. It appears there is some discussion relating to the people Jesus is talking to and to the future; but, which is which? That's my only point.I really like your analysis here [except I also believe it to have been 70AD]; one thought about Matthew 24 concerning "this generation", the Scripture says:
Matthew 24:32-34 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh: 33 So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors. 34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
My question is: Can this be interpreted [the fig tree putting forth its leaves] as Israel becoming a nation again [in 1948]? If so, then we could be now be in the "generation of the fig tree" awaiting His return.
Actually, I am not an advocate of the platonic concept of some ethereal place where we will be spending eternity. My destination is not heaven above but the recreated heavens and earth in the New Jerusalem in a resurrected body.All of us, including you, are spinning our theological wheels in the mud, when it comes to the exact point in time of when the rapture takes place. Since the term rapture is not even in the Bible, I would have to say that both of us are "assuming" a lot more than what we can actually prove.
Can we both agree that we will one day, either individually, or collectively, be taken to heaven? What takes before, during, or after that time of being caught up, is more speculation than it is actual knowledge.
Shalom :flower:
....Its funny how when you say preterist it is as if you are a heathen.
Okay Brothers and Sisters, here goes. Y'all have this all wrong if you think that the Kingdom will be set up here on earth.
Luke 17:20 And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation:
21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.
When you are saved, God places the Kingdom in you, and is now reigning over you from heaven.
So when we die, in your opinion, where are we? Lazarus, in Luke 16, seems to be with Abraham--[the rich man, not so much]The new body we get is what I bolded. When we die, our natural body goes in the ground. When Jesus comes to call us out of the ground, when we come out, we will appear as He is.
Yes, we shall be changed, but until then, we aren't in a hole in the ground.1 John 3
1 Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.
2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.
Amen!!Now, when Jesus comes, this world we live on now, will be burned up, and her works with it.
Again, from my earlier statement, it seems as though the New earth is right here where the old one was, just my [and many others] opinion. God blessThis world is going "bye bye" when the Lord comes to gather His children. When He calls my name, I will join Him in the Cloud, and He's going to take me Home. And Home sure ain't here.
Even those in academic dispensationalism critique the view that distinguishes between the K of God and the K of heaven. The real question is, "What does the word 'kingdom' actually mean?" For me, it primarily means reign or rulership or kingship mostly because that is the primary meaning of the word, not a locale or kingdom (though it can mean that on occasion).I understand there is a lot of debate concerning this [had this discussion with other brothers and sisters more than once]; however, there are many [including myself] who would differ in opinion with you.
Revelation 21:1-2 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. 2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
So I think you are half right--this old earth is going to have to be renovated to receive the city built by God [also, whether you consider the New Jerusalem a city as I do, or the Church, it still is to be placed here in the New Earth]
When you say Kingdom, isn't the Kingdom of God and Kingdom of Heaven 2 different things?
So when we die, in your opinion, where are we? Lazarus, in Luke 16, seems to be with Abraham--[the rich man, not so much]
Yes, we shall be changed, but until then, we aren't in a hole in the ground.
Amen!!
Again, from my earlier statement, it seems as though the New earth is right here where the old one was, just my [and many others] opinion. God bless
Even those in academic dispensationalism critique the view that distinguishes between the K of God and the K of heaven. The real question is, "What does the word 'kingdom' actually mean?" For me, it primarily means reign or rulership or kingship mostly because that is the primary meaning of the word, not a locale or kingdom (though it can mean that on occasion).
That has it's roots in the failure to make a clear distinction between partial and full preterism.
Even those in academic dispensationalism critique the view that distinguishes between the K of God and the K of heaven. The real question is, "What does the word 'kingdom' actually mean?" For me, it primarily means reign or rulership or kingship mostly because that is the primary meaning of the word, not a locale or kingdom (though it can mean that on occasion).
Are you referring to a particular passage??? Where is iron scepter in the Bible?The K of God or the K of heaven. Which one does Jesus rule with an Iron Scepter?
Are you referring to a particular passage??? Where is iron scepter in the Bible?
Are you referring to a particular passage??? Where is iron scepter in the Bible?
Like I was saying, no "iron scepter."Rev 2:27 ‘ He shall rule them with a rod of iron;
They shall be dashed to pieces like the potter’s vessels’—
Psalm 2
7 “I will declare the decree:
The LORD has said to Me,
‘You are My Son,
Today I have begotten You.
8 Ask of Me, and I will give You
The nations for Your inheritance,
And the ends of the earth for Your possession.
9 You shall break them with a rod of iron;
You shall dash them to pieces like a potter’s vessel.’”