• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

President trump and his SC Judge selection!

Rob_BW

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Unknown-1-137584.JPG
 

StefanM

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Exactly what homosexuals have done.

Has there been overreach in some cases? Yes. Laws that have done so should be struck down.

But same-sex marriage does not infringe on another person's religious beliefs. Someone may not like it, but that doesn't mean that the U.S. Constitution allows for that belief to be codified into law or state-level constitutions.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Has there been overreach in some cases? Yes. Laws that have done so should be struck down.

But same-sex marriage does not infringe on another person's religious beliefs. Someone may not like it, but that doesn't mean that the U.S. Constitution allows for that belief to be codified into law or state-level constitutions.

Making excuses for homosexual unions is not becoming of a Christian. If you defend it, you are as guilty of their sin as they are.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yeah, only a liberal would come up with it because a conservative would never think about how "preserving the sanctity of marriage" or some other term for using the force of law to enforce his or her own religious beliefs on others is an infringement of minority rights.

The sanctity of marriage is the foundation for a civil and stable society. We cannot have a civil and stable society without it. We cannot excuse same sex marriages and think that it does not effect the whole of our communities. It, in fact, tears our communities apart. The reason God established the biblical marriage is to build these stable communities.

Comparing same sex marriage and remarriage is apples and refrigerators. Just because they both deal with marriage does not make them equal comparisons.
 

Use of Time

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The sanctity of marriage is the foundation for a civil and stable society. We cannot have a civil and stable society without it. We cannot excuse same sex marriages and think that it does not effect the whole of our communities. It, in fact, tears our communities apart. The reason God established the biblical marriage is to build these stable communities.

Comparing same sex marriage and remarriage is apples and refrigerators. Just because they both deal with marriage does not make them equal comparisons.

We cannot have a civil and stable society without it? Wow, and I thought liberals were supposed to be the snowflakes. Tears our communities apart? Goodness gracious how dramatic. None of this is true.

Why aren't they equal comparisons? Because a lot of Christians tolerate remarriage while we turn a blind eye?
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Has there been overreach in some cases? Yes. Laws that have done so should be struck down.

But same-sex marriage does not infringe on another person's religious beliefs. Someone may not like it, but that doesn't mean that the U.S. Constitution allows for that belief to be codified into law or state-level constitutions.
God is the One who has the right to say what is a valid marriage, and he NEVER has accepted gay ones as valid!
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Also just because one believes we should have certain laws on the books based on biblical principles does not mean we advocate for a theocracy, This country, its constitution, and our original laws were based on biblical principles. We want to stick to that format and never once was it considered a "theocracy".
 

Use of Time

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Also just because one believes we should have certain laws on the books based on biblical principles does not mean we advocate for a theocracy, This country, its constitution, and our original laws were based on biblical principles. We want to stick to that format and never once was it considered a "theocracy".

So you want a theocracy but it's important that we not call it one. Lol.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So you want a theocracy but it's important that we not call it one. Lol.
No, we want a society bsed upon the principles o fthe Bible, but that would include freedom of religion and other freedoms not allowed underareal Theoacry!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No, we want a society bsed upon the principles o fthe Bible, but that would include freedom of religion and other freedoms not allowed underareal Theocary![/ you want to see one, look at a Muslim nation under Shria Law!QUOTE]
 

StefanM

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No, we want a society bsed upon the principles o fthe Bible, but that would include freedom of religion and other freedoms not allowed underareal Theoacry!

Why is blatant idolatry and worshiping other gods OK to protect but gay marriage isn't?
 
Top