President Trump Cans DEFSEC Immediately

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

Your comment “doesn’t mean they don’t deserve hanging” is something you deliberately injected into this thread.

Righteous Temperamce thinks we should have murdered politicians he didn’t like.

No because I say what I mean and I’ve already said without equivocation or quibbling in this thread that no one discussed in this thread warranted the death penalty.

Never referenced lynching Flynn in here.

Come on. You just referenced lynching Flynn in your blanket denial above, or else you are finally admitting that you intentionally misinterpreted my post. Can you not even understand your own posts? No wonder you cannot understand mine.

It is what you said. It was a direct quote. With a cute little emoji for effect. I’m not going to argue with you. If you wish to retract it then fine.

Yet more of your trollishness. There is nothing for me to retract. You didn’t just quote me, but deliberately twisted my words to say I was advocating for murder of politicians I don’t like.

Obviously, deep state cover-up is no proof of innocence, more likely just the opposite. Not trying a criminal for his crime isn’t a sign of innocence. It just means he won’t get his just punishment. In the case of a traitor, execution.

 

[Use of Time]

Come on. You just referenced lynching Flynn in your blanket denial above, or else you are finally admitting that you intentionally misinterpreted my post. Can you not even understand your own posts? No wonder you cannot understand mine.

Yet more of your trollishness. There is nothing for me to retract. You didn’t just quote me, but deliberately twisted my words to say I was advocating for murder of politicians I don’t like.

Obviously, deep state cover-up is no proof of innocence, more likely just the opposite. Not trying a criminal for his crime isn’t a sign of innocence. It just means he won’t get his just punishment. In the case of a traitor, execution.

Folks we got another Carpro style quibbler in the world over here.

1). I never referenced or defended lynching Flynn. That is a lie. I’m not even sure what you were trying to prove with all of the “gotcha” quotes” that literally proved that point for me. Yet you still are hanging on.

2). You said “doesn’t mean they don’t deserve to hang “. Just like that. Your words not mine. I’m supposed to parse out the whole explanation paragraph you just provided above from that little blurb? Well excuse me. It’s full of nothing but crackpot supposition and conspiracy theories anyway.

3). Maybe you should have just said what you said in the last paragraph. Use your words. Less emojis.

4) conspiracy theories vs. a guilty plea are pretty far removed from each other. To quote the great Rev. Mitch. “Not sure why that has to be explained.”

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

Folks we got another Carpro style quibbler in the world over here.

1). I never referenced or defended lynching Flynn. That is a lie. I’m not even sure what you were trying to prove with all of the “gotcha” quotes” that literally proved that point for me. Yet you still are hanging on.

2). You said “doesn’t mean they don’t deserve to hang “. Just like that. Your words not mine. I’m supposed to parse out the whole explanation paragraph you just provided above from that little blurb? Well excuse me. It’s full of nothing but crackpot supposition and conspiracy theories anyway.

3). Maybe you should have just said what you said in the last paragraph. Use your words. Less emojis.

4) conspiracy theories vs. a guilty plea are pretty far removed from each other. To quote the great Rev. Mitch. “Not sure why that has to be explained.”

Look, you can interpret your own posts however you want. And you can quote my posts verbatim. But no one needs you to explain what my posts mean. You’re not qualified in any case--you just don’t exhibit the ability to parse nuance. And you are certainly no mind-reader.

But that is not the real problem here. The real problem is your deliberately twisting my words in order to falsely accuse me. That is what is so unacceptable. So, no, I didn’t just let it go.

You presumed to tell others what I think, and in the process deliberately changed the wording, so that they no longer might deserve execution (obviously because of guilt), but actually should have been murdered because I dislike them. Rather blatant twisting, brother.

When you twist my words in order to falsely accuse me of advocating for murder, then you should expect to be called out, and rightly so. It is a false accusation. You are bearing false witness about a very serious matter.

 

[Use of Time]

Look, you can interpret your own posts however you want. And you can quote my posts verbatim. But no one needs you to explain what my posts mean. You’re not qualified in any case--you just don’t exhibit the ability to parse nuance. And you are certainly no mind-reader.

But that is not the real problem here. The real problem is your deliberately twisting my words in order to falsely accuse me. That is what is so unacceptable. So, no, I didn’t just let it go.

You presumed to tell others what I think, and in the process deliberately changed the wording, so that they no longer might deserve execution (obviously because of guilt), but actually should have been murdered because I dislike them. Rather blatant twisting, brother.

When you twist my words in order to falsely accuse me of advocating for murder, then you should expect to be called out, and rightly so. It is a false accusation. You are bearing false witness about a very serious matter.

A serious matter is usually not depicted in a morbid joke with an emoji. To stop this. I’ll take your word for it but you should watch how you say things about people deserving to hang.

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

He should be hung as a traitor

A serious matter is usually not depicted in a morbid joke with an emoji.

And yet you deliberately misinterpreted it that way, having singled me out.

To stop this. I’ll take your word for it but you should watch how you say things about people deserving to hang.

And maybe you should ask instead of tell before making serious accusations. No, drop the maybe.

 

[Use of Time]

And yet you deliberately misinterpreted it that way, having singled me out.
And maybe you should ask instead of tell before making serious accusations. No, drop the maybe.

1) Again Flynn is a criminal and that is the punishment EWF is maybe recommending. I’ve already said I disagree.

2) Saying “doesn’t mean they shouldn’t hang” isn’t some obvious multi layered nuanced statement. Especially about people that are not criminals.

3). Pound sand. I’m not going bother with the quibbling. You’ve already lied about me defending lynching and conveniently ducked me calling you on it.

We are done. Full stop.

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

1) Again Flynn is a criminal and that is the punishment EWF is maybe recommending. I’ve already said I disagree.

2) Saying “doesn’t mean they shouldn’t hang” isn’t some obvious multi layered nuanced statement. Especially about people that are not criminals.

3). Pound sand. I’m not going bother with the quibbling. You’ve already lied about me defending lynching and conveniently ducked me calling you on it.

We are done. Full stop.

Again, you deliberately twisted my words to make them say what you wanted them to mean. You falsely accused me and continued to defend it even after explanation. I did not lie about you but used your standards of interpretation to show you how wrong you were. Your reaction makes clear your offense. You don’t like it any more than I do. So it sounds like you plan to go pound sand now.

I didn’t duck you, but it’s useless to keep pointing out anything to you when you refuse to see how illogical or biased your own statements are.

Your excuse that Flynn being a criminal makes it OK to say he should be hanged as a traitor is nonsense. He did not plead guilty to treason, or any capital offense. It would still be advocating murder according to your own standards. His officially being a criminal and the others not officially criminals makes no difference.

 

[Use of Time]

Again, you deliberately twisted my words to make them say what you wanted them to mean. You falsely accused me and continued to defend it even after explanation. I did not lie about you but used your standards of interpretation to show you how wrong you were. Your reaction makes clear your offense. You don’t like it any more than I do. So it sounds like you plan to go pound sand now.

I didn’t duck you, but it’s useless to keep pointing out anything to you when you refuse to see how illogical or biased your own statements are.

Your excuse that Flynn being a criminal makes it OK to say he should be hanged as a traitor is nonsense. He did not plead guilty to treason, or any capital offense. It would still be advocating murder according to your own standards. His officially being a criminal and the others not officially criminals makes no difference.

I never said it was okay for Flynn to be hung as a traitor. Like not ever. So stop lying about it. Your last sentence is so laughable I cannot even fathom a response.

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

I never said it was okay for Flynn to be hung as a traitor. Like not ever. So stop lying about it. Your last sentence is so laughable I cannot even fathom a response.

You know about Flynn’s activities with Turkey that netted him $600,000. Anyway, that is my opinion and not yours.

 

[Use of Time]

You know about Flynn’s activities with Turkey that netted him $600,000. Anyway, that is my opinion and not yours.

Yep, he took a deal. He knows it could have been a lot worse.

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

I never said it was okay for Flynn to be hung as a traitor. Like not ever. So stop lying about it. Your last sentence is so laughable I cannot even fathom a response.

Why would you feel I’m “lying about it” or that my “last sentence is so laughable”? The explanation is clear and has already been provided to you, but you just don’t get it.

Someone else called you out on your biased stance from the beginning (review posts #30-40). The comment to you, “Sigh. Try to keep up,” was not idly spoken, but straight to the point. You seem simply incapable of reasoning through, comprehending what has been written, or both. No doubt a lot of it has to do with your own biases, but perhaps you are also just too impatient, too lazy, or both. You’ve defended yourself on the basis that you shouldn’t have to actually think. But if you are not going to think, then you don’t really belong in the discussion, except perhaps to ask questions, and you certainly have no right to twist someone’s words as you have mine.

Oh, and I like the way you stop, full and all.

At least we can agree that you “cannot even fathom a response,” at least a coherent, logical one, because you cannot meet the prerequisites (see above).

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

You know about Flynn’s activities with Turkey that netted him $600,000. Anyway, that is my opinion and not yours.

OK, so just what is your opinion? That Flynn should be hanged without trial, without being found guilty of, or without pleading guilty to a capital offense? Is that your sense of justice?

 

[Praying]

Ok, moving on. How bout we just give them all 4 years in congress and then 4 years in jail. That should cover everyone rather they are dems or reps. After that give them the same medical care we get and let them live on Social Security and see how that works out for them.