President Trump is the victor of the 2020 election by default…by law…and to the U.S. Constitution.

[Reformed1689]

You cannot speak for every American. You do not know if there are single issue voters who only vote for POT:S.

Additionally, did they look for single issue votes for TR:MP?

Suspicion is not evidence.

peace to you

How about dead people voting? Is that just suspicion?

 

[Reformed1689]

You cannot speak for every American. You do not know if there are single issue voters who only vote for POT:S.

Additionally, did they look for single issue votes for TR:MP?

Suspicion is not evidence.

peace to you

Liberals are all the same.

 

[canadyjd]

How about dead people voting? Is that just suspicion?

Six confirmed cases. Definitely fraud. Won’t change outcome.

peace to you

 

[Reformed1689]

Six confirmed cases. Definitely fraud. Won’t change outcome.

peace to you

Six confirmed cases that YOU know about. There are also the mass computer glitches. Wisconsin is now back in toss up status due to glitches discovered yesterday that, of course, changed votes from Trump to Biden.

 

[canadyjd]

Liberals are all the same.

What makes you think I’m liberal? I’m pro-life, pro-second amendment, pro-fiscal conservative, low taxes (favor 10% flat tax) pro- term limits, states rights, balanced budget, pro-constitutionalist judges, pro-traditional marriage and the list goes on.

I am against the death penalty on biblical grounds, but other than that, I’m probably as conservative as you are.

Just because I can see that evidence of fraud, not suspicion, is required, you want to label me a “liberal”.

You need to think a little deeper than that.

peace to you

 

[Reformed1689]

What makes you think I’m liberal? I’m pro-life, pro-second amendment, pro-fiscal conservative, low taxes (favor 10% flat tax) pro- term limits, states rights, balanced budget, pro-constitutionalist judges, pro-traditional marriage and the list goes on.

I am against the death penalty on biblical grounds, but other than that, I’m probably as conservative as you are.

Just because I can see that evidence of fraud, not suspicion, is required, you want to label me a “liberal”.

You need to think a little deeper than that.

peace to you

You seem too excited to call Biden President-Elect, without evidence. He is not the President-Elect. Nobody is.

 

[canadyjd]

Six confirmed cases that YOU know about. There are also the mass computer glitches. Wisconsin is now back in toss up status due to glitches discovered yesterday that, of course, changed votes from Trump to Biden.

As soon as that story posted, I stated the computer glitch issue was the most likely avenue POT:S had to win. Go read the thread, you can find what I said.

There is measurable evidence in that case that can swing this election. The FBI can do a forensic analysis of that software to determine intentionality.

POT:S should demand hand recount in every state (33) that used it.

peace to you

 

[Reformed1689]

As soon as that story posted, I stated the computer glitch issue was the most likely avenue POT:S had to win. Go read the thread, you can find what I said.

There is measurable evidence in that case that can swing this election. The FBI can do a forensic analysis of that software to determine intentionality.

POT:S should demand hand recount in every state (33) that used it.

peace to you

And the throwing out of ballots counted as a result of PA (and other states) changing regulations without consent of the legislature to allow late votes. If those cannot be ascertained, a runoff must be called.

 

[canadyjd]

You seem too excited to call Biden President-Elect, without evidence. He is not the President-Elect. Nobody is.

Please point to the post where I referred to BID:N as pres-elect?

I’ll wait patiently

peace to you

 

[Reformed1689]

Please point to the post where I referred to BID:N as pres-elect?

I’ll wait patiently

peace to you

If you did not I apologize.

 

[canadyjd]

And the throwing out of ballots counted as a result of PA (and other states) changing regulations without consent of the legislature to allow late votes. If those cannot be ascertained, a runoff must be called.

Those ballots are suppose to be segregated. Supremes will rule on that, and POT:S likely wins, because of ruling in 2000 that states couldn’t change rules in middle of process.

peace to you

 

[Jerome]

It would also be kind of stupid for Democrats to rig the election for Biden, yet not also take the Senate.

They took what they could.
Civics 101...just 1/3 of Senate up for election each time

Wisconsin had no election for Senator on the ballot this year
Nevada had no election for Senator on the ballot this year
Pennsylvania had no election for Senator on the ballot this year

Michigan did, incumbent Democrat Senator was trailing then got a bunch of votes days after the election

 

[Reformed1689]

Those ballots are suppose to be segregated. Supremes will rule on that, and POT:S likely wins, because of ruling in 2000 that states couldn’t change rules in middle of process.

peace to you

And my bet is that they were not segregated and you can't unscramble the egg.

 

[canadyjd]

And my bet is that they were not segregated and you can't unscramble the egg.

Speculating they defied order and didn’t segregate ballots does not help.

My understanding is the ballots were segregated but added to total vote count.

peace to you

 

[Reformed1689]

Speculating they defied order and didn’t segregate ballots does not help.

My understanding is the ballots were segregated but added to total vote count.

peace to you

The order didn't come on election day. So obviously not all ballots would have been segregated.

 

[Reformed1689]

Speculating they defied order and didn’t segregate ballots does not help.

My understanding is the ballots were segregated but added to total vote count.

peace to you

And the most damning evidence, if they have nothing to hide and everything is on the level, why did they keep observers out of the process?

 

[canadyjd]

And the most damning evidence, if they have nothing to hide and everything is on the level, why did they keep observers out of the process?

They didn’t “keep them out”, they “kept them back”.

A number of explanations could satisfy a judge. They were worried about Covid. They were worried about intimidation. They were worried about interference.

peace to you

 

[canadyjd]

The order didn't come on election day. So obviously not all ballots would have been segregated.

Ok, I don’t know when order came down. But if ballots received after election but prior to order were placed in the count, then there is no way to measure it, so there’s no remedy the court could consider.

peace to you

 

[Reformed1689]

They didn’t “keep them out”, they “kept them back”.

A number of explanations could satisfy a judge. They were worried about Covid. They were worried about intimidation. They were worried about interference.

peace to you

Except that's not according to the law. They had a right to observe and if you aren't letting them observe that is keeping them out.

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

They didn’t “keep them out”, they “kept them back”. A number of explanations could satisfy a judge. They were worried about Covid. They were worried about intimidation. They were worried about interference.

None of those excuses make any valid sense and should satisfy no judge concerned with a fair election.