preacher4truth
Active Member
The "Ignore Feature" is wonderful fellas! You should try it:smilewinkgrin:
CAN YOU SEE THIS?????????!!!!!!!!!!!! :laugh: :thumbsup:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The "Ignore Feature" is wonderful fellas! You should try it:smilewinkgrin:
Keep in mind this was not against what you stated, or trying to go against what you said. I know you were being kind in giving the benefit of the doubt, and I can appreciate that. In my estimation, after much error has been propagated several times, it seemed time to shift to "since." Van needs to abrogate his erroneous teachings here.
But his is not the only example in this thread where what God knows has come into question.
I see the creation of a finite god to mans liking coming into "being" here. It is a reduction of His omnis, His person and nature. I really really have a hard time understanding a person undermining the person and nature of God, especially of a believer. This being done by one that claims Him as Savior is bewildering to say the least. How could one do so, and what place does this god have in the life of such a person when he is reduced to a finite being by said teachings? Obviously there is NO infinite nature in a god that comes to learn and know things. These teachings are contrary to Scripture, and against the very nature and Sovereignty of God.
This is literally making His Name and person less than what it and He is. Any person who teaches against God knowing all things at all times has reduced God to a finite being. The fact that Christ left the "times" of His coming in the hands of the Father does NOT mean that God does not know all things at all times.
The fact is God knows all things, at all times, and NEVER "comes to know something."
I have never seen anything like this in ANY Baptist church, nor have I witnessed such come from any Baptist that I have ever met.
This is clearly error.
Yes, friend, you are correct. By the way, I didn't think your post was against what I was saying.
Unfortunately, Van has some pretty bizarre ideas and, perhaps more unfortunately, he is absolutely unwilling to be teachable. As I've told him before, there are many on this board--Calvinists and Arminians alike--who have academic degrees in these things. It is not as if we're plumbers who are offering whimsical opinions about scriptural things.
I have enjoyed your posts and I think all that is left for us to do with Van is to pray for him.
Blessings,
The Archangel
CAN YOU SEE THIS?????????!!!!!!!!!!!! :laugh: :thumbsup:
what am i doing now:tongue3::laugh:
Yes, friend, you are correct. By the way, I didn't think your post was against what I was saying.
Unfortunately, Van has some pretty bizarre ideas and, perhaps more unfortunately, he is absolutely unwilling to be teachable. As I've told him before, there are many on this board--Calvinists and Arminians alike--who have academic degrees in these things. It is not as if we're plumbers who are offering whimsical opinions about scriptural things.
I have enjoyed your posts and I think all that is left for us to do with Van is to pray for him.
Blessings,
The Archangel
Just because some buy from Bass Pro Shops vs L.L. Bean is no reason to throw rocks Archangel.
Well, that's true. But we all know L.L. Bean is the best.
Folks, note that all the Calvinists have to offer are attacks against me
Folks P4T rightly understands I am attacking Calvinism.
I have demonstrated, to my satisfaction, that God remembering our sins no more forever, means He puts what He has foregiven, the infraction paid by Christ, out of His mind. Therefore, by logical necessity, total omniscience is unbiblical. Inherent omniscience is the biblical doctrine.
I have shown that the verses that say God is all knowing refer to God knowing everything about the hearts of those in view, such as Peter and the other disciples in John 21.
No actual effort has been made to defend the false doctrine, only to claim it is true and attack me for not accepting what is unbiblical.
If God devises plans, then He alters what would have occurred otherwise. Why would God devise a plan if His action did not alter the future? You have no answer!!
Why would God say now I know, if He already knew? You have no answer, except to say God did not really mean what He said. Thus you let man-made doctrine nullify scripture after scripture after scripture.
Not one calvinist has "attacked" you in this thread.
Edit....
Calvinists & non-cals alike can see your fallacious teachings.
Folks P4T rightly understands I am attacking Calvinism.
I have demonstrated, to my satisfaction, that God remembering our sins no more forever, means He puts what He has foregiven, the infraction paid by Christ, out of His mind. Therefore, by logical necessity, total omniscience is unbiblical. Inherent omniscience is the biblical doctrine.
I have shown that the verses that say God is all knowing refer to God knowing everything about the hearts of those in view, such as Peter and the other disciples in John 21.
No actual effort has been made to defend the false doctrine, only to claim it is true and attack me for not accepting what is unbiblical.
If God devises plans, then He alters what would have occurred otherwise. Why would God devise a plan if His action did not alter the future? You have no answer!!
Why would God say now I know, if He already knew? You have no answer, except to say God did not really mean what He said. Thus you let man-made doctrine nullify scripture after scripture after scripture.
Here is what Archangel said:
Unfortunately, Van has some pretty bizarre ideas and, perhaps more unfortunately, he is absolutely unwilling to be teachable.
Now rather than post truth, P4T simply claims the above statement is not an attack on me personally, i.e. I am unteachable.
Folks, deception is the stock and trade of Calvinism.