Question on how KJVO Regard the 1611 Kjv?

[JesusFan]

If that translation was indeed inspired by the Holy Spirit as an infallible and perfect English translation, who do majority use later edited editions then?

 

[Saved421]

If that translation was indeed inspired by the Holy Spirit as an infallible and perfect English translation, who do majority use later edited editions then?

Good day,

Hope doing well, I take it as a milestone in human history and with tons of printer errors.

 

[Conan]

English Versions of the Bible

 

[Dr. Bob]

Good day,

Hope doing well, I take it as a milestone in human history and with tons of printer errors.

And tons of translation errors

And tons of Greek textual errors

The Anglican 1611 was 85% copied (revising earlier English translations slightly). It was not "new" and certainly not "inspired" or "perfect". But you are correct in that it was a "milestone" in history and should be recognized as such.

 

[Marooncat79]

They plagiarized earlier versions of the NT esp

 

[JesusFan]

And tons of translation errors

And tons of Greek textual errors

The Anglican 1611 was 85% copied (revising earlier English translations slightly). It was not "new" and certainly not "inspired" or "perfect". But you are correct in that it was a "milestone" in history and should be recognized as such.

Think was very much based off Tyndale and prior translations before it

 

[JesusFan]

Good day,

Hope doing well, I take it as a milestone in human history and with tons of printer errors.

Do you have the 1611 with Apocrypha included?