Questions for the anti-Lordship Salvation people..

[EdSutton]

You did not address what I said Ed.

You asked one question, in the post, to which, incidentally I had already replied, about the importance of 'false teacher'. The rest was effectively a 'lecture', as in a classroom lecture, as opposed to any sort of questions type of post.

I have addressed what you said, therefore; I merely (as I also have previously said) have not allowed you (or any other) to define for me.

Ed

 

[EdSutton]

The wordings are not found in the Scriptures?Must everything in a biblical creed/confession of faith be in KJV-speak?

'Um, no. Wrong forum!! [FONT=verdana,sans-serif] [/FONT]

[FONT=verdana,sans-serif] [/FONT]

Let me repeat that!

[FONT=verdana,sans-serif] [/FONT]

[FONT=verdana,sans-serif] [/FONT]

Ed[FONT=verdana,sans-serif][/FONT][FONT=verdana,sans-serif][/FONT]

 

[Rippon]

Context Ed.Context.

The wordings are not found in the Scriptures?Must everything in a biblical creed/confession of faith be in KJV-speak?The Canons of Dort summarize quite cogently biblical concepts relating to the errors of the Remonstrants.The terms 'Trinity' and 'accounability of man' are also not found in the Bible;but they are scriptural nonetheless.Besides,if you take the time to go through the Canons of Dort you will note ample scriptural support as you will find in the Westminster Confession Of Faith also.

Whether in KJV-speak,NASBU-speak or any other is not the issue. The issue is if a given creed or confession of faith is being biblical.Are scriptural concepts to be found there,or not? That's the question.I believe that for the most part the Canons of Dort are exceedingly scriptural.