Racist Reagan

[Agent47]

Do you include the racism of a Rev Wright, Farrakhan, abd Black lives matter in this also?

'everyone is a racist'

 

[Agent47]

I defend the Constitution. People have a Constitutional right to be racist. They also have the right to be leftist Communists. I detest both, but I defend their right to believe as they choose.

They also have a right to be any of LGBTQ+. Do you defend their right to any orientation since you defend the Constitution?

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

The extent you go to skirt around a racist statement tells me all I need to know about you. Racists do this often. They like convincing themselves that everyone thinks like them. Refuge in numbers

Ignoring for now your unjustifiable accusations toward others on this board, since you raised the question and now judged, how about explaining why you think this comment by Reagan unequivocally constitutes racism. Perhaps I might even agree with you, if you can properly lay out the case.

BTW, I recently heard Dobson say a coach criticized his whole team for the way they were acting toward some girls. The specific term used wasn’t “monkeys” but “chimpanzees.” Would that change be enough to keep the coach or Reagan safe from a racism charge?

 

[Yeshua1]

They also have a right to be any of LGBTQ+. Do you defend their right to any orientation since you defend the Constitution?

Yes, but there is NO right to have the Church accept their sinful lifestyles as being somehow not permitted and sanctioned by God! That active and practicing lifedtyle still Abomination in eyes of God!

 

[Agent47]

Yes, but there is NO right to have the Church accept their sinful lifestyles as being somehow not permitted and sanctioned by God! That active and practicing lifedtyle still Abomination in eyes of God!

Depends on what 'church' and what 'god' but I digress.

Reread the post to comprehend before blabbering

 

[Agent47]

Ignoring for now your unjustifiable accusations toward others on this board, since you raised the question and now judged, how about explaining why you think this comment by Reagan unequivocally constitutes racism. Perhaps I might even agree with you, if you can properly lay out the case.

BTW, I recently heard Dobson say a coach criticized his whole team for the way they were acting toward some girls. The specific term used wasn’t “monkeys” but “chimpanzees.” Would that change be enough to keep the coach or Reagan safe from a racism charge?

Still wrestling with the fact that your boy was a closet racist?

 

[Reynolds]

They also have a right to be any of LGBTQ+. Do you defend their right to any orientation since you defend the Constitution?

The Constitution does not give that tight. SCOTUS bastardazation gave that right.
Homosexuality was illegal in all the States when and after ratification of the Bill of Rights. Was illegal in most States until 2980s. The the courts changed the Constitution.

 

[Agent47]

The Constitution does not give that tight. SCOTUS bastardazation gave that right.
Homosexuality was illegal in all the States when and after ratification of the Bill of Rights. Was illegal in most States until 2980s. The the courts changed the Constitution.

Why should it be illegal in your world?

 

[Reynolds]

Why should it be illegal in your world?

Same reason polygamy, and incest are illegal.

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

Still wrestling with the fact that your boy was a closet racist?

Unsurprisingly, you have no able response. But you seem to have the use of racist lingo down pat (“boy”).

 

[Agent47]

Unsurprisingly, you have no able response. But you seem to have the use of racist lingo down pat (“boy”).

It's because your rant is not worth my while

 

[Agent47]

Same reason polygamy, and incest are illegal.

It's because your rant is not worth my while

Keep dreaming

There are no valid grounds for banning polygamy. Incest has health risks

 

[Reynolds]

Keep dreaming

There are no valid grounds for banning polygamy. Incest has health risks

Smoking, drinking, over eating, and spending time in the sun have health risks. Homosexuality just as promiscuous heterosexuality have health risks. Both were illegal and should still be.

 

[Agent47]

Smoking, drinking, over eating, and spending time in the sun have health risks. Homosexuality just as promiscuous heterosexuality have health risks. Both were illegal and should still be.

Incest affects the innocent. That's why it's different. What consenting adults do with their bodies and orifices should be down to them and not the government

 

[Wingman68]

Depends on what 'church' and what 'god' but I digress.

Reread the post to comprehend before blabbering

What God & what church do you ascribe to?

 

[Reynolds]

Incest affects the innocent. That's why it's different. What consenting adults do with their bodies and orifices should be down to them and not the government

Why? The government controlls most everything else. Fornication leads to murder of the innocent.

 

[Yeshua1]

They also have a right to be any of LGBTQ+. Do you defend their right to any orientation since you defend the Constitution?

Just a question, did God have the right to demand that His people not be into lesbian/homesexual lifestyles, active participating, and that the death penalty was issued to those caught in those acts? For the Christian, what is the ulimaye authority, US Constitution or the scriptures?

 

[InTheLight]

There are no valid grounds for banning polygamy.

Tax reasons.
Health insurance benefit reasons.
Social security benefit reasons.
End of life and living will reasons.

 

[Agent47]

What God & what church do you ascribe to?

Why does it matter?

 

[Agent47]

Just a question, did God have the right to demand that His people not be into lesbian/homesexual lifestyles, active participating, and that the death penalty was issued to those caught in those acts? For the Christian, what is the ulimaye authority, US Constitution or the scriptures?

This is about government not your perception of 'god'