• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Benoni

Member
Site Supporter
So the "everlasting fire" is not everlasting? Can you show me where anyone gets out of the lake of fire? I'd love to see that verse.
By the way my Grandfather studied for the Priesthood in the Greek Orthodox religion and that religion believed that they were the true church little "c" because they knew the original Greek. We can debate language all day long but like I said earlier it does not matter because like my Grandfathers religion we all have our bias.

Here is my bias:


The real problem with words like eternal everlasting and for ever and ever is the Babylonian religious system that refuse to look outside of their man made religious box. The seminaries keep puppeting the same old doctrines of damnations generation after generation. Occasionally you will find a Bible scholar willing to agree with the following. A careful study of the Greek word “aionios” (translated as “eternal,” “everlasting,” and “forever and ever” in our English translations) shows that it comes from the Greek noun “aion” which always means “an indeterminate period of time.” It is a most unfortunate thing that the translators of old chose to translate “aionios” from the Latin language rather than the Greek from which the word is derived. God’s punishment will not last forever as is commonly taught, but will only last for the ages and only UNTIL God’s purpose for it is complete.


Eternal, eternity, etc. is not actually found in Scripture though in some aspects applied through inference of propositions. The problem is that the Greek words which were translated to "eternal" actually do not translate properly in English because there is no word in English which translates it properly. In this case, the word is "AIONIOS" and it is a descriptive adjective which just means "of, or in, or belonging to, or coming from, or resmbling, or befitting the AION.

AION is a noun meaning, "A period of time, or perpetuity of time, or definitive age, or unbroken age." It simply means an age with unknown measure which can be indefinitive or definitive.

So literally the word "AIONIOS" being translated as "Eternal" would more accurately be defined as "agely"; however since "agely" is not a real word, that leaves the English language without a literal translation for the word "AIONIOS".

So anytime you saw Jesus say "Eternal" this and "Eternal" that, he didn't say "perpetuality of time" but rather an indeterminate duration that is neither perpetual or definitive.
 

Benoni

Member
Site Supporter
No, those verses break my heart. Were I in charge nobody would end up in the Lake of Fire. But I am not in charge. God is. And even if I don't understand it now, someday I will, and will acknowledge that God's way is infinitely superior to my way.

. :)

If they break your heart as you claim than it surely is not of God. Let peace rule. Obviously your doctrine is wrong if peace does not rule and they break your heart. Here is what God's Word has to say about not being at peace or as you claim "breaking your heart.

Let the Peace of God Rule-

“And let the peace of God rule in your hearts.... Colossians ..peace, the umpire and ruling principle



The word “rule” used in our text comes from the Greek word, “brabeuo”, meaning TO ACT AS JUDGE OR PRESIDENT. Let PEACE be the ruling principle to decide and settle with finality all arising issues. We give three other translations to help bear out the scope of meaning:



“Let the ruling principle in your hearts be Christ’s peace, for in becoming members of one body you have been called under its sway. (Goodspeed).



“Let the peace which Christ gives settle all questionings in your hearts....(Weymouth).



“(act as umpire continually) in your hearts - deciding and settling with finality all questions that arise in your minds - , …” (Amplified).



The word PEACE is defined as: a state of tranquility or quiet; freedom from fears, agitating passions, etc. including freedom from moral confict. What conflict we endure trying to decide if the matter be right, or wrong; not necessarily if it be sinful or holy, but to decide which are the right issues, the right step, or the right stand to take. And so for all of this, what should become the ruling factor in making decisons? LET THE PEACE OF GOD ACT AS THE UMPIRE.
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Love to. Here is another one of your so called “harmonizes with many other passages which speak about the destruction of the unsaved”.

Matt 25:32 And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divided his sheep from the goats:

Please some one turn the light on.

A sheep is a mature believe, a sheep is a very loyal to His master and eats only the best of the grasses.

Now I want to go to Matt 25:32 and I note; many are assuming a goat is a non believer, all it is your assumption, look at the Greek; I see a goat as an immature believer (baby goat); who are separated because of their spiritual immaturity. Many are mature in their little religious box; but are immature spiritually; they have that immature goat nature.

Where on the other hand a goat or the Greek word (eriphos or kid; baby goat) So I see it as God separating his Sheep mature from His immature kids; spiritually speaking)

NT:2056

1 Corin 10:11 Now all these things happened unto them for examples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world (age) are come.

On the other hand a goat is also a clean animal, now if you the verse referred to a pig or unclean animal I would agree with the traditional teaching. A pig would be a great example of the unjust/heathen; but a goat was used all though out the OT as a sacrificial animal’ so how can it be the unjust? (scrape goat); and why would God burn up a baby goat in everlasting fire; what did the baby goat do?


Actually nothing; the unqualified and unjust and bias translators obvious made a grave error in the word everlasting and should of translated it ages (NT:166 Aionios). The word means ages; limit duration. The has happen a number of times in scripture and can be easily proven by the context of the verse.



But according to these bias translators God is going to send a baby goat to everlasting fire.


Matt 25:41Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels


So many of God’s people are goats and all they eat is garbage; in other words damnable heresies or heresies of damnation/condemnations/ all those heresies that condemn people to torture.


Is not a goat a clean animal; how can a goat be the unsaved; the unsaved are defiled; Jesus was a Jew and knew all the clean and unclean animal. So you are saying we should throw away all the OT types and dismiss them and replace them with bias Christian assumptions?

I am going to a farm today where sheep are going to be sheared (and I am giving the wool to a friend). There are also goats there. One goat just turned three years old and I can safely say that at no time as he matures is he going to turn into a sheep. Your theology is SORELY flawed.
 

Benoni

Member
Site Supporter
I am going to a farm today where sheep are going to be sheared (and I am giving the wool to a friend). There are also goats there. One goat just turned three years old and I can safely say that at no time as he matures is he going to turn into a sheep. Your theology is SORELY flawed.
So how is it flawed? No one ever said a goat is a sheep. I said a goat is a clean animal according to the Law of Moses not according to my opinion. If a goat is a clean animal according to the law of Moses how can this be symbolic of the loss. I also said a pig is not a clean animal according to the Law of Moses so it would make more sense if our Lord would separate the sheep from the pigs but or Lord did not use this terminology. Jesus knews this do you?
 

Farmer34

New Member
Site Supporter
Jesus stated to Nicodemus in John 3:5: "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the wind, he cannot enter the kingdom of God." I have substituted 'wind' for 'Spirit' that occurs in most translations because most Greek scholars know this is the accurate translation of the word. The Holy Wind and Holy Water of God that brings regeneration is one, the Third Person of the Trinity.

Then Jesus also states to explain: "That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Wind is Wind, Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born from above, the Wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So it is with everyone who is born of the WInd.”

The Holy WInd (and Holy Water) of God, the third person of the Trinity, brings one-step salvation to each elect soul. AND ONLY ONE. I have no trouble with using either regeneration OR conversion to describe the one step God takes toward any elect soul to resurrect him or her from death to life by giving faith (belief) in the Person and Work of Christ for that same soul's eternal redemption. It is a one-time everlasting miracle and is not progressive. The 'conversion' chart would imply a Wesleyan or Arminian concept of a series of 'salvation steps' that man must take toward God (repentance, confession, faith, conversion, surrender, obedience, entire 'sanctification') that must all be there to finally be saved in the judgment.
 

Benoni

Member
Site Supporter
Jesus stated to Nicodemus in John 3:5: "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the wind, he cannot enter the kingdom of God." I have substituted 'wind' for 'Spirit' that occurs in most translations because most Greek scholars know this is the accurate translation of the word. The Holy Wind and Holy Water of God that brings regeneration is one, the Third Person of the Trinity.

Then Jesus also states to explain: "That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Wind is Wind, Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born from above, the Wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So it is with everyone who is born of the WInd.”

The Holy WInd (and Holy Water) of God, the third person of the Trinity, brings one-step salvation to each elect soul. AND ONLY ONE. I have no trouble with using either regeneration OR conversion to describe the one step God takes toward any elect soul to resurrect him or her from death to life by giving faith (belief) in the Person and Work of Christ for that same soul's eternal redemption. It is a one-time everlasting miracle and is not progressive. The 'conversion' chart would imply a Wesleyan or Arminian concept of a series of 'salvation steps' that man must take toward God (repentance, confession, faith, conversion, surrender, obedience, entire 'sanctification') that must all be there to finally be saved in the judgment.
So why does God have an elect? To play harps in eternity while trillions of God's people are being tortured forever and ever in a Lake of fire? I think God is not such a monster. God's elect are here so God will have saviorS coming out of Mt Zion (Mt Zion the high spiritual place where the throne of God is and his elect will dwell) So that he will bring all those lost souls he never called and they to will be made alive in Christ. Acts 15:14
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I believe in grace and you believe in condemnation. God is a just God and yes He gave us the law but he also gave us the blood of Jesus. Yes man will be punished (prune/chastise) for this is God's will but in the end all will be made alive in Christ.

You only know only of the doom and doom, the negative; the left hand of God. The cross at Calvary was a total and complete failure with your doctrines of damnation because the sin of Adam is far more powerful then the blood of Jesus with your false creeds.

Acts 24:15
And have hope toward God, which they themselves also allow, that there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust.


Resurrection means to rise; notice the word unjust.
God cause man to fall and God will restore man
There are NO passages in the Bible that would support Universalism, as there is an eternal hell, and all who rejected jesus as messiah will be judgement in and for their sins by the living God!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Not ignorant I know what I read. Your whole police is based on God is going to torture trillions of people forever and ever and ever that's heresy
God is not raking sinners over the coals in Hell, as he is granting to them their "will" to not to be in the presense of God at all, for those who reject God here would find heaven to be Hell to them!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The word hell is a mistranslation from three Greek words and one Hebrew word. Basically means the pit of the grave. Then there the Lake of Fire which God will use to punish the wicked but not forever.
Those who are in the lake of fire exist forever there...
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What verse are you referring? In time God will save all. All flesh will see the salvation of God. that is why God has an elect so that in the ages to come all will know him.
The Bible states that Jesus and His angels will execute judgement in fiery judgement on those who reject Him, correct?
 

Benoni

Member
Site Supporter
God is not raking sinners over the coals in Hell, as he is granting to them their "will" to not to be in the presense of God at all, for those who reject God here would find heaven to be Hell to them!
How has he granting them their will? We are born is a body cursed by death, sin and the curse of Adam. Did we ask for this? This was God's will not little carnal man.
 

Benoni

Member
Site Supporter
That would be labeled heresy, correct?
Chapter and verse please? Notice I quote scripture not some bias opinion.

Notice that the false prophets are. Or the false teachers. Those who teach damnation.

"But there were false prophets also among the people,
even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily
shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that
bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction." (II Pt 2:1)



It does state heretical teachings are damning the loss. There is absolutely nothing else in the context of the verse it would be speaking of.
 

Benoni

Member
Site Supporter
The Bible states that Jesus and His angels will execute judgement in fiery judgement on those who reject Him, correct?
Amen. God's judgments are just and his fire is spiritual. God is a spirit and has no need for physical fire.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
How has he granting them their will? We are born is a body cursed by death, sin and the curse of Adam. Did we ask for this? This was God's will not little carnal man.
Adam choose from his Free will to fall, and he represented before God the entire human race!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Chapter and verse please? Notice I quote scripture not some bias opinion.

Notice that the false prophets are. Or the false teachers. Those who teach damnation.

"But there were false prophets also among the people,
even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily
shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that
bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction." (II Pt 2:1)



It does state heretical teachings are damning the loss. There is absolutely nothing else in the context of the verse it would be speaking of.
There is an eternal hell, as jesus Himself declared it to be such!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Amen. God's judgments are just and his fire is spiritual. God is a spirit and has no need for physical fire.
Fire could be a metaphor for the ternal judgement of God towards those who reject Jesus, as an eternal condemnation!
 

Benoni

Member
Site Supporter
Adam choose from his Free will to fall, and he represented before God the entire human race!
Free will is a religious term not a scripture term. Yes we can freely choose many things as a carnal man. We did not choose our parents, where we were born and we do not choose our own salvation. We are saved by grace not the religious word freewill.

Now when it comes to Adam. No where does it say in Genesis that Adam chose to fall by freewill. But it does say in Ps 90. God turn man to destruction (not little Adam I will add). So plese show me using scripture not your opinion.


Ps. 90:1-3. "Lord, You have been our dwelling place in all generations. Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever You have formed the earth or the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, You are God. You (God) turn man to destruction; and say return you children of men.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top