Also would your ggd and his readers have the vocabulary to describe oneNot any more than I'd know an anti-gravity machine if I saw one, or my great-grandpa, a Civil war vet, would've known what a stealth bomber was if he'd seen one.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Also would your ggd and his readers have the vocabulary to describe oneNot any more than I'd know an anti-gravity machine if I saw one, or my great-grandpa, a Civil war vet, would've known what a stealth bomber was if he'd seen one.
I think he would know it wasn't a creature.Not any more than I'd know an anti-gravity machine if I saw one, or my great-grandpa, a Civil war vet, would've known what a stealth bomber was if he'd seen one.
Isn't this what Darwinists say of Moses? He was no Einstein, so how else could he describe Creation?Also would your ggd and his readers have the vocabulary to describe one
Yes, but I'm not trying to be more specific than Scripture. What's being written about could very easily be helicopters. Or it couldn't. Either way, it's not fiction.Isn't this what Darwinists say of Moses? He was no Einstein, so how else could he describe Creation?
Doubtful, but, of course, we can only speculate!Also would your ggd and his readers have the vocabulary to describe one
You're still saying John employed metaphor.Yes, but I'm not trying to be more specific than Scripture. What's being written about could very easily be helicopters. Or it couldn't. Either way, it's not fiction.
Yes, but I am saying it's not "futurist fiction."You're still saying John employed metaphor.
It still doesn't change the fact you're not taking the passage literally.
- Rev. 9:10 "They had tails with stingers, like scorpions, and in their tails they had power to torment people for five months."
Historical fact: the length of time that Jerusalem was under siege by the Roman armies was 5 months. From April to August. Also, the Romans used ballistic weapons that were nicknamed "stingers"and had a specific ballistic weapon called a Scorpion.
One can verify this with Josephus and Ussher (both as to the terminology and the dates).
Once again, it can be proven that the entire purpose of Revelation has been misconstrued to accommodate a futurist, not a historical fulfillment. It was certainly future fulfillment as far as John's readers were concerned, but it is long past from our perspective.
...and all the Roman Catholic priests breathed a sigh of relief and said "amen".
Any biblical proof that Israel refers to the Church all of the time in the NT then?...bingo... you didn't know? 'Dispy privilege', they get to cherry pick which passages are literal and which aren't...
The Romans forgot to upgrade to the full prophecy version which allowed flight.Although I've been a Preterist for several years, I didn't know that. Quite interesting, and that clearly supports the Preterist position. And I'd always thought Stingers were just Air Defense Artillery weapons☺
If it hasn't yet happened, it hasn't yet happened. "Soon", etc. become moot if it hasn't yet happened.
Have the prophesied events already occurred? if so, please show us proof from a legitimate & comprehensive work of history, such as Encyclopaedia Britannica.So did Christ lie, or was He mistaken?
Actually, it refutes the pret hooey that much more.Although I've been a Preterist for several years, I didn't know that. Quite interesting, and that clearly supports the Preterist position. And I'd always thought Stingers were just Air Defense Artillery weapons☺
Have the prophesied events already occurred?
No, reject your understanding in regards to his second coming!If you believe they haven't then you must believe that Christ either lied or was wrong. Which is it?
No, reject your understanding in regards to his second coming!