Revelation 17:8

[Mexdeaf]

I think he is just off his meds.

 

[william s. correa]

what is ? BTW

 

[Mexdeaf]

(double post)

 

[william s. correa]

Originally posted by Mexdeaf:
I think he is just off his meds. [/QUOTE No I,m Just Saved

 

[Scott J]

Originally posted by william s. correa:
what is ? BTW

By the way

 

[robycop3]

mR. cORREA:There is not a single case of a verse that is in Greek and not in the KJB, or vise versa.

You've been shown one in over 12 pages of posts right here. The original post asked if kaiper esti was a typo, or just how it got into the TR when no known source for the TR has that reading. You took it upon yourself to declare it correct because it's in the KJV, and when you saw no one was buying that, you then said it WAS in a Greek manuscript. You said you had PROOF for the authenticity for that reading, and you'd show us when you were ready. Now, you're back to saying it's correct because it's in the KJV. EITHER YOU HAVE PROOF, OR YOU DON'T! Now, it's time to WALK THE WALK & either present your proof or admit you don't have any.


And not one verse or phrase has been touched in the King James Bible for over 400 years.[/i]

Hasn't it?

Have you ever read the AV 1611? If not, I suggest you get one & read it, with a current KJV edition beside it.

Keiper estin is ifact the same meaning and all of you have just bee acting like little chldren! NEXT !

Not according to anyone who reads Greek.

And there's STILL no explanation from you as to how that phrase got into the Textus Receptus. I still say it was most likely a goof, or, less likely, a deliberate addition. I have yet to see your "proof" to lead me to think differently.

The "next" is in YOUR corner now.

 

[Scott J]

He has to be faking.

 

[Hope of Glory]

If you have it show it, William. The burden of proof lies with you.

I hope that no one else will respond to your ridiculous claims until you show it or admit that it's just hearsay.

 

[Scott J]

I am also wondering if William was really born in 67. A man of that age might not be educated... but he'd surely be wise enough not to embarrass himself so badly.

 

[william s. correa]

Out to lunch be back in 15 min

 

[DesiderioDomini]

There is something wrong here. Either way, William has the common sense of my left shoelace, and the biblical knowledge of my Beta.

Either way, he has done nothing [personal attack snipped]

[ May 17, 2006, 01:19 AM: Message edited by: C4K ]

 

[william s. correa]

Originally posted by DesiderioDomini:
There is something wrong here. Either way, William has the common sense of my left shoelace, and the biblical knowledge of my Beta.

Either way, he has done nothing but honor Satan in every post.

[personal attack snipped]

[ May 17, 2006, 01:20 AM: Message edited by: C4K ]

 

[Bro Tony]

And you Honor Satan by reading the NASB!

William,

Whether you like DD or not, you have just blasphemed the Word of God. Be very careful--you have attributed the Word of God to being of the devil. Do you really want to do this? You better get before the Lord and keep your mouth shut before its too late. You can prefer the KJV all you want but don't say the Word of God is of the devil.

Bro Tony

 

[rbell]

Methinks the mods have sir william on speed dial...

 

[william s. correa]

Apocalypse 17:8 Never judge a word in the Bible by the way it is used by DD, but rather judge the way DD uses a word, by the way the Bible uses it!
DD has become FIXED in a FALSE DOCTRINE. Be not deceived! Interpretations belong unto God!
DD is not supposed to read his doctrine into the word of God, but rather read the doctrine of the scripture OUT of the scripture! The answer to your Question is lying in the Wind! But it is there!

 

[william s. correa]

Originally posted by Bro Tony:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />And you Honor Satan by reading the NASB!

William,

Whether you like DD or not, you have just blasphemed the Word of God. Be very careful--you have attributed the Word of God to being of the devil. Do you really want to do this? You better get before the Lord and keep your mouth shut before its too late. You can prefer the KJV all you want but don't say the Word of God is of the devil.

Bro Tony </font>[/QUOTE]Have I Honored Satan in Every Post? or is that How you folk gang up on some one! We dont wrestle Against Flesh and Blood! But He started it! I still have proof!

 

[william s. correa]

Originally posted by robycop3:
mR. cORREA:There is not a single case of a verse that is in Greek and not in the KJB, or vise versa.

You've been shown one in over 12 pages of posts right here. The original post asked if kaiper esti was a typo, or just how it got into the TR when no known source for the TR has that reading. You took it upon yourself to declare it correct because it's in the KJV, and when you saw no one was buying that, you then said it WAS in a Greek manuscript. You said you had PROOF for the authenticity for that reading, and you'd show us when you were ready. Now, you're back to saying it's correct because it's in the KJV. EITHER YOU HAVE PROOF, OR YOU DON'T! Now, it's time to WALK THE WALK & either present your proof or admit you don't have any.


And not one verse or phrase has been touched in the King James Bible for over 400 years.[/i]

Hasn't it?

Have you ever read the AV 1611? If not, I suggest you get one & read it, with a current KJV edition beside it.

Keiper estin is ifact the same meaning and all of you have just bee acting like little chldren! NEXT !

Not according to anyone who reads Greek.

And there's STILL no explanation from you as to how that phrase got into the Textus Receptus. I still say it was most likely a goof, or, less likely, a deliberate addition. I have yet to see your "proof" to lead me to think differently.

The "next" is in YOUR corner now.

BRIGHT IN THE CORNER WHERE YOU ARE! JESUS IS IN MY CORNER!Did you check out Codex Sinaiticus in th 4th ce

ntury they are going to find Revelation 17:8 and all of you will be surprised!

 

[TCassidy]

Never judge a word in the Bible by the way it is used by william s. correa, but rather judge the way william s. correa uses a word, by the way the Bible uses it!

william s. correa has become FIXED in a FALSE DOCTRINE. Be not deceived! Interpretations belong unto God!

william s. correa is not supposed to read his doctrine into the word of God, but rather read the doctrine of the scripture OUT of the scripture! The answer to your Question is lying in the Wind! But it is there!

 

[TCassidy]

Originally posted by william s. correa:
Did you check out Codex Sinaiticus in th 4th century they are going to find Revelation 17:8 and all of you will be surprised!

In Revelation 17:8 Codex Sinaiticus reads "ουκ εστιν και παρεσται" so, once again, william has been caught telling an untruth.

 

[william s. correa]

"When English Versions disagree with one another, which 'reading' are we to choose???"