IN the Acts thread, Trevor responded:
I agree with you Trevor, that Revelation contains symbols.
And that care must be taken in interpreting the book, and that some interpretation is required.
By 'interpretation', here we primarily mean 'identification', that is connecting the symbols and figures of the book with real world events and entities around us.
That having been said, these issues have been raised 140 years ago or more, when people like Christopher Wordsworth noted that interpreters were inconsistent in handling symbols:
For instance, interpreters took the 'Harlot of Babylon' in an allegorical sense and applied it to the Roman Catholic Church, while they took the "Euphrates River' in the same sections of the book 'literally', as the actual river in Iraq.
Wordsworth's own view was that both examples were symbolic, or rather the use of known, recognized symbols with 'properties' , "Babylon" (= the future 'harlot' will be like Babylon was), and the "Euphrates" (= the commerce and corruption will be like the ancient Euphrates). He also held that since a crudely literal interpretation was impossible (Babylon had fallen already, the Euphrates was not the central trade route in Jesus' day), that all the symbols must be consistently interpreted symbolically.
There is some common sense to Wordsworth's criticisms regarding how Revelation was handled in his time.
I wonder if we are any better off really today. There is a wide variety of interpretations of Revelation, even among those who take it very literally, and apply it to today, as being the "Last Days" etc.
This is why I am exploring it freshly in the first place, looking for historical pieces that can plausibly and coherently fit the puzzle-picture portrayed in Revelation.
peace
Nazaroo
Trevor said:I apologise that this has ended up in your Acts thread, so I will try to be brief. Another definition is “Continuous Historic” understanding of the Book of Revelation. The seven seals for example are the events that transpired to bring about the replacement of the Pagan Roman system with a nominally “Christian” Roman system. But the 7th seal then incorporates Seven Trumpets which commences another period, and then the 7th trumpet incorporates the 7 vials. My understanding is that we are in the 6th Vial period, just before the return of Christ and the battle of Armageddon Revelation 16.
I believe that the Book of Revelation depicts events by using symbols, and we need to be careful as to what we take literally and what is understood by symbols.Quote:
Its understandable that many prophecies in Revelation seemed so utterly fantastic to early Christians, that it was thought that they must be allegories or exaggerations, or whimsical interpretations of ordinary events in the early empire.
But now especially, we are finally coming to the point in history where
many of these predictions are being supported by new scientific discovery.
Scientists now admit for instance, that not only can a large comet or asteroid
hit the earth with the results described in Rev, but that we are overdue for a such a hit!
What Christian today can credibly argue that we should take such a prophecy
as if it were referencing a past unremarkable event, or an allegory,
when even atheist and agnostic scientists are saying its a literal probability?
Update your interpretations of Revelation man, smell the coffee before its too late.
peace
Nazaroo
Kind regards
Trevor
I agree with you Trevor, that Revelation contains symbols.
And that care must be taken in interpreting the book, and that some interpretation is required.
By 'interpretation', here we primarily mean 'identification', that is connecting the symbols and figures of the book with real world events and entities around us.
That having been said, these issues have been raised 140 years ago or more, when people like Christopher Wordsworth noted that interpreters were inconsistent in handling symbols:
For instance, interpreters took the 'Harlot of Babylon' in an allegorical sense and applied it to the Roman Catholic Church, while they took the "Euphrates River' in the same sections of the book 'literally', as the actual river in Iraq.
Wordsworth's own view was that both examples were symbolic, or rather the use of known, recognized symbols with 'properties' , "Babylon" (= the future 'harlot' will be like Babylon was), and the "Euphrates" (= the commerce and corruption will be like the ancient Euphrates). He also held that since a crudely literal interpretation was impossible (Babylon had fallen already, the Euphrates was not the central trade route in Jesus' day), that all the symbols must be consistently interpreted symbolically.
There is some common sense to Wordsworth's criticisms regarding how Revelation was handled in his time.
I wonder if we are any better off really today. There is a wide variety of interpretations of Revelation, even among those who take it very literally, and apply it to today, as being the "Last Days" etc.
This is why I am exploring it freshly in the first place, looking for historical pieces that can plausibly and coherently fit the puzzle-picture portrayed in Revelation.
peace
Nazaroo