• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness

Status
Not open for further replies.

37818

Well-Known Member
Ones life is a right, but it is a right belonging to God, not man.
So God commaning man does not make man against murder and to have off spring is not constute that there is a God given right of life to man? Silly if it is not.
 

37818

Well-Known Member
Yes, it is a command given - not a right but a responsibility.
So the command to life as a responsibility does not amount to God givening man a right to life. Which means you believe our DOI is based on a Satanic lie (John 8:44).
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
So God commaning man does not make man against murder and to have off spring is not constute that there is a God given right of life to man? Silly if it is not.
No, not silly. All rights belong to God (the Potter has rights over the clay).

If men had the right to life (apart from a political context) then God is guilty of violating man's rights.

Men do not have the right to take another man's life. This means within a specific context we have a right to life, but not outside that context.

If I due by being attacked by an animal my rights have not been violated. If I die in an automobile accident, my rights have not been violated. If I die if a disease my rights have not been violated.

I cannot have a right over something that is not mine.
 

37818

Well-Known Member
Either the rights to life, liberty and persuit of happiness are God given rights to man or Satanic lies. Satan being the father of lies (John 8:44).
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
So the command to life as a responsibility does not amount to God givening man a right to life. Which means you believe our DOI is based on a Satanic lie (John 8:44).
No, it doesn't. Parents die. God telling Jonah to go to Nineveh was not a right to life.

You are mistaken about me believing the DOI a lie. I believe the DOI is a political document declaring our independence from England and concerned with the governance of a people.

Within a government men have those rights simply because a government does not have the right to take them. God has endowed men with life. A government has no authority to take what God has given.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
That is a silly argument. God as God did not by giving man a right to life negate His sovereignty over man in all things.
This is simply saying God has the right to violate man's rights.

The difference is simply that I do not see God's actions as a violation....ever.

Is God not sovereign when somebody is murdered?
 

37818

Well-Known Member
No, it doesn't.
Either the claims of the God given rights to life, liberty and the persuit of happiness are true or they are a falsehood. If a falsehood, Satanic being that Satan is the father of lies (John 8:44).
 

37818

Well-Known Member
Man's right to life ended with the fall.
You do not know what you are talking about.
Genesis 9:6 was after the fall which said, ". . . Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man. . . ."
Even the commandment, Exodus 20:13, "Thou shalt not murder."
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Either the claims of the God given rights to life, liberty and the persuit of happiness are true or they are a falsehood. If a falsehood, Satanic being that Satan is the father of lies (John 8:44).
Good point. The issue remains context and what the DOI is actually stating.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You do not know what you are talking about.
Genesis 9:6 was after the fall which said, ". . . Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man. . . ."
Even the commandment, Exodus 20:13, "Thou shalt not murder."
That was a prohibition against murder. Nothing more.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Does not change the issue. Either the DOI states a truth or it does not. If our DOI is false . . . .
It absolutely changes the issue.

If the DOI is a theological document then it is a lie.

If the DOI is a political science document then it is true.

The reason it matters is the context changes.


Within a political context God has endowed people with qualities that nobody has a right to take away. The reason is these things are not given by people or a government.

In this context men are justly entitled to the right of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness because these are given not by a government but by God and are not dependent on secular government.

In a theological context, however, God gives and sustains our life. This is not something to which we are entitled but something we have at His mercy. God can take our life, liberty, even the ability to pursue our own happiness without violating our rights.

Men can stand before a government and de large the government has violated their rights. Men have absolutely no ground to stand before God and make this claim.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
I agree on this point.
To clarify, do you believe that God violates our right to life when we die (that the right to life is ontological to men)?

I'm not saying unjustly (I know you believe God is sovereign and just). But is our loss of life a violation of an inherent right?
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Thread closed at the request of the OP.

Please feel free to continue this discussion by starting a new thread.

Perhaps exploring the DOI in depth would be an interesting segue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top