1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Romans 8:6.....What is it getting at.

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Iconoclast, Apr 6, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    well, he did hold with and teach another gospel!
     
  2. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    Context here is vital, as Calvin also taught Preincarnate Christ was Michael, but both of them held was he was God in the OT!

    and NT Wright still plainly NT wrong where iot matters most. how a lost sinner gets justified before Holy God!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,454
    Likes Received:
    451
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Does not answer the question
     
  4. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,454
    Likes Received:
    451
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Then Calvin taught that Jesus Christ is not YHWH as Michael was created
     
  5. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    Would say that the really solid and good biblical authors of modern times were a majority of the time really either Reformed or Calvinists!
     
  6. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    • Like Like x 1
  7. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    Can one be saved holding to another Gospel?
     
  8. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    34,635
    Likes Received:
    3,698
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Not really. He was a Calvinist. But he believed God used man (the preacher), truth (the gospel message), and the sinner (who would repent and believe). In using man he believed in emotional appeals.
     
  9. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    34,635
    Likes Received:
    3,698
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes, they believed Michael the Archangel is Christ - God. They also believed in infant baptism.
     
  10. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,454
    Likes Received:
    451
    Faith:
    Baptist
  11. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    34,635
    Likes Received:
    3,698
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It was a fairly common belief (like the Angel of God being Christ). But they were wrong about a lot.
     
  12. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,454
    Likes Received:
    451
    Faith:
    Baptist
    But the Angel or Messenger of God or the Lord, is Jesus Christ. No doubt about that
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    he held to full free will heresy, that has plagued the Church since his time!
     
  14. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    Calvin ONLY held that the Prince of His people in Daniel 12 mentioned was preincarnate Christ!
     
  15. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    They held that JUST the appearance of Him in Daniel 12 was actually Christ!
     
  16. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    The Angel of the Lord was preincarnate Christ
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,856
    Likes Received:
    2,115
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Very good. In fact, all sorts of very respectable theologians have seen Michael as being the Lord Jesus. I have a really excellent book called Rock of our Salvation by a 19th Century Presbyterian called W.S. Plumer (reprinted by Sprinkle Books) who does just that. I disagree, but I'm not about to discard the rest of the book.
    I'm inclined to agree with Calvin that it is unwise to get too preoccupied with the various "gradations of honour" among angels.

    One other point: if to be 'Reformed' means nothing more today than not to be Dispensational, then the word has lost its meaning. In fact, to be Reformed means to accept one or more of the Reformed Confessions as correct*, and especially to uphold Article 1:1 of the1689 Confession: The Holy Scripture is the only sufficient, certain and infallible rule of all saving knowledge, Faith and Obedience. There is no way in the world that Karl Barth, Finney or N.T. Wright are Reformed.

    *A certain latitude is generally allowed in adherence to one or two articles, particularly that which pronounces the pope to be the Antichrist.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  18. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Yes, to suggest these men were reformed shows a lack of knowledge as to what being reformed is.
     
  19. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    34,635
    Likes Received:
    3,698
    Faith:
    Baptist
    To suggest otherwise is not to understand what Reformed is.

    "After the war, Barth engaged in controversies regarding baptism (though a Reformed theologian, he rejected infant baptism), hermeneutics, and the demythologizing program of Rudolf Bultmann (which denied the historical nature of Scripture, instead believing it a myth whose meaning could heal spiritual anxiety)."


    Some people idolize Karl Barth as entirely in line with the heritage of John Calvin. Others demonize him as clearly emerging from one of the lower rims of Dante’s Inferno. In my judgment the truth of the matter is far more complex. There are many parts of Karl Barth’s writings that are luminescent. They are wonderfully evocative when he speaks of the glory and the greatness and the majesty of God and when he speaks of the importance of Christ. On so many, many fronts Karl Barth really was the premier theologian of the twentieth century in terms of volume of writings, profundity of analysis and so on. It would be nice if every movement that came along was right from the throne room of God or right from the pit so you could bless it or damn it and get on with life, but that is just not the way life is.

    And so it is sad if knowledgeable pastors don’t make use of Barth, but it is even more sad if they make a wrong use of Barth.

    (D.A. Carson, The Gospel Coalition)

    We even see R.C. Sproul relying on Barth in How Should I Live in This World.

    It is no accident Barth is considered "the gold standard of Reformed theology".
     
    #179 JonC, Apr 12, 2022
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2022
  20. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    I am at The pilot truckstop off of exit 11 on I -20 if you have any spare time..will be here for a bit.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...