As the candidate Obama could beat the easiest, he is the darling of liberals that have no liberal to vote for in their own primary.
http://caucuses.desmoinesregister.c...s-protest-gop-caucuses-fallon-helped-run-one/
Actually, polls show that he is one of the ones that do the BEST out of everyone.
Similar scenes were played out all over Iowa. Paul's Iowa numbers are contrived.
Not so. According to the polling data, only 17 percent of those who voted in the primary were non-conservatives. Of that number, Paul did get 40 percent, but Romney was just barely behind him, and even SANTORUM got almost 10 percent of them!
The amount of Democrats who switched was negligible (Less than 2 percent), and of those that voted for Paul, most will vote for Paul in the General election. Paul's movement is a genuine appeal to others to abandon their party, and vote for him.
ROMNEY, on the other hand, also has a movement among Democrats. However, in his case, it is an effort to get the most liberal candidate as an alternative to Obama, if their party should lose the White House, and fragment the party...
			
				Last edited by a moderator: